I_Got_Da_Burna
Superstar
You don't know that. That is why it is called an investigation. They are investigating and we will not know anything until they make their report to Rosenstein before proceeding with prosecution.
Everything that we are hearing now (leaks) on obstruction of justice is not coming from the FBI or the special prosecutor. It is all likelihood coming from lawyers of the people that have been questioned by the special prosecutor or the grand juries about what Trump asked them to do and/or from House and Senate sources that are familiar with what is currently going on with the Special Prosecutor. That Wapo story yesterday smells like it was leaked by a Republican on that Senate Intel Committee, because it came out right after Mueller met with them that morning. That was a head's up to the President. Hell Trump and the Republicans probably knew days ago what Mueller was doing, which is why he was talking about firing Mueller earlier in the week; and the leak yesterday by the Republicans just confirmed to Trump that he is now under investigation.
No i do know that. How many different democrats have to come out and say it? no proof has been found whatsoever, and if there was, it would have been found and/or presented a long time ago.
NSA has proof of collusion. Exclusive: NSA Chief Admits Donald Trump Colluded With Russia
okay, I'm going to talk to you like a man, and not a male nurse for a second
Are you serious with that sensational article? Nowhere in that piece does it prove collusion with Russia. The entire article based off of conjecture. Just look at the language the author used:
In his town hall talk, Rogers reportedly admitted that President Trump asked him to discredit the FBI and James Comey, which the admiral flatly refused to do. As Rogers explained, he informed the commander in chief, “I know you won’t like it, but I have to tell what I have seen”—a probable reference to specific intelligence establishing collusion between the Kremlin and Team Trump.
Rogers then added that such SIGINT exists, and it is damning. He stated, “There is no question that we [meaning NSA] have evidence of election involvement and questionable contacts with the Russians.” Although Rogers did not cite the specific intelligence he was referring to, agency officials with direct knowledge have informed me that DIRNSA was obviously referring to a series of SIGINT reports from 2016 based on intercepts of communications between known Russian intelligence officials and key members of Trump’s campaign, in which they discussed methods of damaging Hillary Clinton.
NSA employees walked out of the town hall impressed by the director’s forthright discussion of his interactions with the Trump administration, particularly with how Rogers insisted that he had no desire to “politicize” the situation beyond what the president has already done. America’s spies are unaccustomed to playing partisan politics as Trump has apparently asked them to do, and it appears that the White House’s ham-fisted effort to get NSA to attack the FBI and its credibility was a serious mistake.
This reads like a blog littered with conjecture and supposed inside information. Why would you even bother posting such nonsense?