Richard Dreyfuss said he don't fukk with the Oscar's new DIVERSITY rules

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
63,786
Reputation
13,587
Daps
261,299
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
:mjpls:

Richard Dreyfuss at the premiere of Sweetwater on April 11, 2023 in Burbank, California. He said he opposes the new diversity rules because acting is an art form.

Richard Dreyfuss at the premiere of "Sweetwater" on April 11, 2023 in Burbank, California. He said he opposes the new diversity rules because acting "is an art form."
Mark Von Holden/Variety/Getty Images
CNN —
Actor Richard Dreyfuss is not a fan of the Academy Awards’ new diversity guidelines.
Officials announced in 2020 that beginning in 2024, movies must meet certain criteria for representation to be eligible for the Academy Award for best picture.
Films have to meet at least two of four benchmarks, which cover – among other things – whether the lead actors are from underrepresented groups or if at least 30% of the cast and crew come from these groups.

Dreyfuss told Margaret Hoover during an interview Friday on the PBS series “Firing Line” that such rules “make me vomit.”
When Hoover asked him why, the actor said, “Because this is an art form.”
“It’s also a form of commerce and it makes money,” the actor said. “But it’s an art. And no one should be telling me as an artist that I have to give into the latest, most current idea of what morality is.”
The inclusion standards were enacted in an attempt to address inequality in the industry, which gave rise to the #OscarsSoWhite movement in 2015.
“I don’t think that there is a minority or a majority in this country that has to be catered to like that,” Dreyfuss went on to say during the interview.
He then cited a bit of a history regarding Laurence Olivier being “the last white actor to play Othello,” referring to the 1965 film, in which the British actor performed in blackface
Dreyfuss praised the performance, saying Olivier played the role “brilliantly.”
“Am I being told that I will never have a chance to play a Black man?” Dreyfuss said. “Is someone else being told that if they’re not Jewish they shouldn’t play the Merchant of Venice? Are we crazy? Do we not know that art is art?”





Hoover pushed back, asking if there’s “a difference between the question of representation and who is allowed to represent other groups … and the case of blackface, given the history of slavery and the sensitives around black racism?”
Dreyfuss said, “There shouldn’t be.”
“Because it’s patronizing,” he said. “Because it says that we’re so fragile that we can’t have our feelings hurt.”

CNN has contacted reps for Dreyfuss for further comment but has not yet received a response.

 

Pull Up the Roots

I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,543
Reputation
7,245
Daps
91,349
Reppin
Detroit
Dreyfuss then defended Laurence Olivier’s performance in the 1965 film Othello, starring Olivier in blackface as Shakespeare’s tragic hero. “He played a Black man brilliantly,” Dreyfuss told Hoover. “Am I being told that I will never have a chance to play a Black man? Is someone else being told that if they’re not Jewish, they shouldn’t play the Merchant of Venice? Are we crazy? Do we not know that art is art? This is so patronizing. It’s so, it’s so thoughtless, and treating people like children.”

When Hoover asked Dreyfuss if “there’s a difference between the question of representation and who is allowed to represent other groups,” particularly with regard to blackface “given the history of slavery and the sensitivities around Black racism,” Dreyfuss replied, “There shouldn’t be…. Because it’s patronizing. Because it says we’re so fragile that we can’t have our feelings hurt. We have to anticipate having our feelings hurt, our children’s feelings hurt. We don’t know how to stand up and bop the bully in the face.”

Talk about entitlement. This old racist has been catered to all his life and has the nerve to say this? What the fukk would he know?:camby:
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
78,914
Reputation
23,796
Daps
358,516
Officials announced in 2020 that beginning in 2024, movies must meet certain criteria for representation to be eligible for the Academy Award for best picture.

Films have to meet at least two of four benchmarks, which cover – among other things – whether the lead actors are from underrepresented groups or if at least 30% of the cast and crew come from these groups.


I’m not defending Richard Dreyfus and I don’t really understand his argument about Othello, but I think having these benchmarks to win Best Picture are stupid.

If a movie is good it’s good. Why does it have to jump through some arbitrary hoop just for the optics of it?

This is probably why a slightly above average film like Everything Everywhere All at Once won Best Picture despite being one of the most underwhelming films to ever win the award by comparison to most other years.

To be clear: I do agree that Hollywood ought to recognize great films with minority casts. But I don’t believe in creating some phony minimum benchmark to elevate ones that aren’t really deserving.
 

Vintage Eclectic

Lord of the Sky
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
1,989
Reputation
365
Daps
5,040
Reppin
Chi-York
An old sundodger exposing his racist viewpoints? I'm shocked:mjpls:.

Please understand my people, as much as these white walkers pretend to be allies, they will never try to dismantle the system in place that enables and protects these thoughts, behaviors and actions (white supremacy).

And wtf is a Richard Dreyfuss?
 

SCJoe

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
4,002
Reputation
484
Daps
9,608
Isn't dude a perrenial fukk up, hence the fact that he isn't cast in anything worth a damn anymore? Basically the Fonz's character from Barry
 
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
64,613
Reputation
27,636
Daps
384,057
Reppin
Ft. Stewart, Ga
Officials announced in 2020 that beginning in 2024, movies must meet certain criteria for representation to be eligible for the Academy Award for best picture.

Films have to meet at least two of four benchmarks, which cover – among other things – whether the lead actors are from underrepresented groups or if at least 30% of the cast and crew come from these groups.


I’m not defending Richard Dreyfus and I don’t really understand his argument about Othello, but I think having these benchmarks to win Best Picture are stupid.

If a movie is good it’s good. Why does it have to jump through some arbitrary hoop just for the optics of it?

This is probably why a slightly above average film like Everything Everywhere All at Once won Best Picture despite being one of the most underwhelming films to ever win the award by comparison to most other years.

To be clear: I do agree that Hollywood ought to recognize great films with minority casts. But I don’t believe in creating some phony minimum benchmark to elevate ones that aren’t really deserving.


For almost 100 years the Academy Awards have been ignoring, snubbing, or disregarding films made by or heavily featuring black creatives and other creatives of color.

I don’t care about the “if its good then its good” ideology because the playing field has NEVER been level.

So to you, Richard Dreyfuss, or any other white person who has a problem with a PORTION of their privilege being dispersed amongst minorities I say welcome to the back of the bus.
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
78,914
Reputation
23,796
Daps
358,516
For almost 100 years the Academy Awards have been ignoring, snubbing, or disregarding films made by or heavily featuring black creatives and other creatives of color.

I don’t care about the “if its good then its good” ideology because the playing field has NEVER been level.

So to you, Richard Dreyfuss, or any other white person who has a problem with a PORTION of their privilege being dispersed amongst minorities I say welcome to the back of the bus.
I understand that.
I just don’t think their solution is good.

To me, you don’t put up EEAAO for best picture just because they had a bunch of Asians in it. Having these weird minority benchmarks could mean that legendary all time great movies wouldn’t even be eligible to win if they were made today. Like, you could shyt on 12 Angry Men for being a bunch of cacs. Fine. But you can’t tell me it’s not a better movie in every possible way to EEAAO. And with these new rules…you’re potentially eliminating a better movie from contention and recognition for the sake of “inclusion” and not actual merit.
 
Top