Religious brehs, thoughts on Alexander the Great

[Dave24]

Whatever we may think of Alexander--whether Great or only lucky, a civilizer or a sociopath--most people do not regard him as a religious leader. And yet religion permeated all aspects of his career. When he used religion astutely, he and his army prospered. In Egypt, he performed the ceremonies needed to be pharaoh, and thus became a god as well as a priest. Babylon surrendered to him partly because he agreed to become a sacred king. When Alexander disregarded religion, he and his army suffered. In Iran, for instance, where he refused to be crowned and even destroyed a shrine, resistance against him mounted. In India, he killed Buddhists, Jains, and Hindus by the hundreds of thousands until his officers, men he regarded as religious companians, rebelled against him and forced him to abandon his campaign of conquest. Although he never fully recovered from this last disappointment, he continued to perform his priestly duties in the rest of his empire. As far as we know, the last time he rose from his bed was to perform a sacrifice.

Ancient writers knew little about Near Eastern religions, no doubt due to the difficulty of travel to Babylon, India, and the interior of Egypt. Yet details of these exotic religions can be found in other ancient sources, including Greek, and in the last thirty years, knowledge of Alexander's time in the Near East has increased. Egyptologists and Assyriologists have written the first thorough accounts of Alexander's religious doings in Egypt and Mesopotamia. Recent archaeological work has also allowed scholars to uncover new aspects of Macedonian religious policy. Soldier, Priest, and God, the first religious biography of Alexander, incorporates this recent scholarship to provide a vivid and unique portrait of a remarkable leader.

So, according to the author of this book when Alexander used religion he and his army always prospered. And when he disregarded religion that was when he and his army suffered. Would Alexander have conquered the entire world if he would of used religion his entire life and never disregarded it?/



Did Alexander worship and sacrifice towards demonic beings and participate in luciferian activities?



@bigdaddy88

@IVS

@alexander.

@Leasy

@thekingsmen

@Charlie Hustle

@Afrodroid

@#1 pick

@Big Morg (killa killa)

@kevm3

@Black Hans

@SheWantTheD

@Adidacs

@YouMadd?

@Chicadee901

 

[#1 pick]

Checking this out...

 

[cobra]

In India, he killed Buddhists, Jains, and Hindus by the hundreds of thousands until his officers, men he regarded as religious companians, rebelled against him and forced him to abandon his campaign of conquest.


i dont think his men rebelled against because of religious reasons

they rebelled and forced him to leave because they didnt want that smoke from @śïñe•qúå_nøn

 

[IVS]

My problem with the history surrounding Alexander is that they say he lived 356 - 323 BC.

But we know there was BC\AD timeline back then because that revolves around the invention of the bible and the publishing of the New Testament. That whole timeline is a creation of the Catholic church and a very recent creation for that matter.

The Byzantine Apocalypse though makes Alexander and King Byzas who they said built Byzantium contemporaries. . According to the invented chronology Byzantium was built in 667 BC.

And then it says that After Alexander died King Byzas sent Germanicus as his emissary to the King of Ethiopia\Kush, who was Alexander's grandfather, and he received Kusheth the mother of Alexander as his bride. But the "Greeks" say Alexander's mother is Olympia...

Note Kush-Ethiopia encompassed what we know as Arabia and included the territory now associated with Greater Israel

Germanicus is typically associated with the Julio-Claudians but they dont come into existence til 27 BC according to this chronology.

There is mischief afoot in so called history. I dont know what to trusts from mainstream scholarship surrounding Alexander the Great.

• These are the people whom Alexander imprisoned inside the gates of the North: Ogug and Magog and Joel and Agag and Ashkenazu and DIpar and Putoio and Lydians and Huns and Persians and Daqlaie and Tebelie and Darmetaie and Kaukebaie and Emrataie and Garmidmaie and Men-Eaters who are called Cynocephali and Thracians and Alani and Plsllie and Deshie and Saltraie. These twenty-two kingdoms were imprisoned inside the gates of the North. And when Alexander, the first king of the Greeks, died, because he did not take a wife and had no sons, there ruled after him those generals of his. And Cusheth, mother of Alexander, returned to Cush to the house of her father. And King Byzas, who built Byzantium, the capital surrounded by the sea, sent the general Germanicus to Phol, king of the Cushytes. And he made peace with him and wrote to him concerning his daughter, the mother of Alexander, so that he might take her to wife and might make her queen.
  
  And when the king of the Cushytes received the letter that was in the hands of Germanicus, commander of Byzas king of the Greeks, and when he saw the gifts and honors which he sent to him, he rejoiced greatly. And at once Phol also took with him from the choice produce of the kingdom of the Cushytes and also his daughter Cusheth and went up to Byzantium to King Byzas together with thirty thousand Cushytes. And he was received hospitably by King Byzas beyond the sea of Chalcedon. And he gave gifts to the hosts that entered inside Byzantium with him, and
  great honors and gifts according to the bounty of the king he gave to him. And the king of Greece took Cusheth, daughter of King Phol of the Cushytes.

 

[TEH]

A faggit could never be a God ... only a devil ...

 

[The M.I.C.]

A faggit could never be a God ... only a devil ...

God is titular.

A man who exercises power over large swaths of humanity could call himself a god because god, boiled down, means “judge”. Priests can be judges as well as kings..so the title of god equally applies throughout as shown in antiquity by man’s reverence towards their religious leaders and royalty.

Lucifer is a god, the god of this world, because he exercises power to elevate and destroy them that operate outside of certain statutes. As far as Alexander, him being bisexual would most certainly be a requisite for him being able to rule effectively...Lucifer hates women, he only uses them as tools to divide and destroy, he hates their ability to reproduce, to create, because it’s the fulfilling power of the Most High. This is why Satan is usually looked upon as being androgynous..having the best properties of a woman (breasts, ass, etc..) in beauty and having the properties of a man (penis) to show power and dominance but not have the ability to reproduce.

Gays and lesbians showcase this somewhat which is why they’re handled with kids glove but they’re usually emotionally unstable and can be swayed to go straight..transsexuals are living embodiments of what Lucifer desires for man to live for. Before I ramble on, for you to gain power and rule in this world even going back to antiquity, you had to be involved in some ritual that emulated the principle I mentioned above.

 

[The M.I.C.]

Alexander’s failure to conquer and resulting fragmentation of his kingdom could be attributed to fate as the prophet Daniel already foretold of his rise and fall, the division of his kingdom and the rise of Rome.

It’s irrelevant whether or not he made mistakes because his reign was destined to be short anyway.

 

[GreenGrass]

he never conquered india

 

[The Fade]

My problem with the history surrounding Alexander is that they say he lived 356 - 323 BC.

But we know there was BC\AD timeline back then because that revolves around the invention of the bible and the publishing of the New Testament. That whole timeline is a creation of the Catholic church and a very recent creation for that matter.

The Byzantine Apocalypse though makes Alexander and King Byzas who they said built Byzantium contemporaries. . According to the invented chronology Byzantium was built in 667 BC.

And then it says that After Alexander died King Byzas sent Germanicus as his emissary to the King of Ethiopia\Kush, who was Alexander's grandfather, and he received Kusheth the mother of Alexander as his bride. But the "Greeks" say Alexander's mother is Olympia...

Note Kush-Ethiopia encompassed what we know as Arabia and included the territory now associated with Greater Israel.

Germanicus is typically associated with the Julio-Claudians but they dont come into existence til 27 BC according to this chronology.

There is mischief afoot in so called history. I dont know what to trusts from mainstream scholarship surrounding Alexander the Great.

• These are the people whom Alexander imprisoned inside the gates of the North: Ogug and Magog and Joel and Agag and Ashkenazu and DIpar and Putoio and Lydians and Huns and Persians and Daqlaie and Tebelie and Darmetaie and Kaukebaie and Emrataie and Garmidmaie and Men-Eaters who are called Cynocephali and Thracians and Alani and Plsllie and Deshie and Saltraie. These twenty-two kingdoms were imprisoned inside the gates of the North. And when Alexander, the first king of the Greeks, died, because he did not take a wife and had no sons, there ruled after him those generals of his. And Cusheth, mother of Alexander, returned to Cush to the house of her father. And King Byzas, who built Byzantium, the capital surrounded by the sea, sent the general Germanicus to Phol, king of the Cushytes. And he made peace with him and wrote to him concerning his daughter, the mother of Alexander, so that he might take her to wife and might make her queen.
  
  And when the king of the Cushytes received the letter that was in the hands of Germanicus, commander of Byzas king of the Greeks, and when he saw the gifts and honors which he sent to him, he rejoiced greatly. And at once Phol also took with him from the choice produce of the kingdom of the Cushytes and also his daughter Cusheth and went up to Byzantium to King Byzas together with thirty thousand Cushytes. And he was received hospitably by King Byzas beyond the sea of Chalcedon. And he gave gifts to the hosts that entered inside Byzantium with him, and
  great honors and gifts according to the bounty of the king he gave to him. And the king of Greece took Cusheth, daughter of King Phol of the Cushytes.

But pay attention to the fact that he banished the Persians, yet somehow the "Persian" ideas are present in the Pentateuch\Septuagint. The idea of the First Man world king Gayomart, naming the animals, angels bowing etc. The evil serpent...the perpetual fire

The Byzantine Apocalypse?

 

[IVS]

The Byzantine Apocalypse?

Pardon me....The Byzantine Apocalyptic tradition more specifically writings called the Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius

 

[IVS]

Alexander the Great is associated with Hellenistic culture spread and really the most important thing is the spread of architecture and of the Hellenic letter writing system so called Greek letters and of the "Greek" language. Alexander is the first king of the Hellenes\"Greeks."

The Hellenes are marked by the capitals of columns\pillars in architecture. The Hellenes are Doric, Ionic and Aeolian tribes or confederacies. You can mark which group of Hellenes were around based upon the capitals on the ancient "Greek" temples scattered about Europe and the so called Middle East.

Also important is scholars say Latin comes from Aeolic "greek".

 

[fkthisgaysite]

I've never read about bro. I'm more about demonology.

This is interesting tho...

 

[The Fade]

Pardon me....The Byzantine Apocalyptic tradition more specifically writings called the Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius

Why are those writings significant? Seems interesting

 

[tuckgod]

 

[SheWantTheD]

Used to be very religious but ain't this the same person Jesus was depicted after?

The blonde haired blue eyed jesus that is.