Premiums rising faster than eight the years before Obamacare COMBINED

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,978
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,069
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/18/r...r-than-eight-years-before-obamacare-combined/

Health insurance premiums have risen more after Obamacare than the average premium increases over the eight years before it became law, according to the private health exchange eHealthInsurance.
The individual market for health insurance has seen premiums rise by 39 percent since February 2013, eHealth reports. Without a subsidy, the average individual premium is now $274 a month. Families have been hit even harder with an average increase of 56 percent over the same period — average premiums are now $663 per family, over $426 last year.
Between 2005 and 2013, average premiums for individual plans increased 37 percent and average family premiums were upped 31 percent. So they have risen faster under Obamacare than in the previous eight years.
 

CACtain Planet

The Power is YOURS!
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,182
Reputation
-10,770
Daps
13,279
Reppin
CACness Aberdeen
ObamaCare Exposes Dems' Lies About the Uninsured

Health Care: One good thing about ObamaCare is that it finally laid bare the bogus claims Democrats have been making about the uninsured. Now can we get on with real reforms that will really help those in need?

According to the Congressional Budget Office, ObamaCare was supposed to make a major dent in the uninsured population in its first year — cutting its ranks by 13 million.

The CBO figured that of the 6 million it expected to sign up through an ObamaCare exchange and the 8 million added to Medicaid, 86% would have previously been uninsured.

The prediction looks to be wildly off the mark.

Of those who bought ObamaCare-approved insurance, just 27% came from the ranks of the uninsured, according to a February survey by McKinsey & Co. In the months leading up to February, that figure was just 11%.

Even this could be optimistic, since McKinsey also found that about half of the previously uninsured still hadn't paid their first ObamaCare premium. Many of them could wind up back in the uninsured pool.

In addition, Medicaid enrollment will likely be lower than predicted, and no one seems to know how many of these had been uninsured.

What's more, surveys consistently find that the uninsured don't like ObamaCare.

The Kaiser Family Foundation's monthly tracking survey found that they actually turned more hostile to the law after the exchanges opened in October.

The share of uninsured who had an unfavorable view of the law jumped from 35% in September to 56% in February. (That number dropped a bit in March, but was still well above the prior year's average.)

The Kaiser survey also found that more than two-thirds of the uninsured hadn't even tried to buy insurance in the past six months, and half said they don't plan to buy an ObamaCare plan.

These results no doubt befuddle liberals, who had convinced themselves that 46 million people desperately wanted insurance but had been "locked out" by greedy insurance companies who wouldn't cover them because they were sick or old.

So how come these people aren't swarming to the exchanges? The truth is that Democrats had been misleading the country about the uninsured for decades, mischaracterizing who they were, exaggerating their plight, and grossly inflating their numbers.

ObamaCare is now exposing this fraud for all to see.

Of the 46 million who supposedly lacked insurance, for example, more than 40% were either eligible for Medicaid, enrolled in Medicaid, or weren't U.S. citizens. ObamaCare helps none of these groups.

Of the rest, they are predominantly young and in good health. Most of their intervals spent without insurance are relatively short and a significant portion have incomes over $50,000, which means they aren't eligible for ObamaCare subsidies.

Meanwhile, just 5% said they were refused insurance because of poor health or age, according to a Kaiser survey. Most cited cost as the barrier.

But while ObamaCare claims to solve the first problem through its guaranteed issue requirement, it largely fails to fix the cost problem. Even with subsidies, ObamaCare's inflated premiums are still unaffordable for many uninsured.

In fact, the McKinsey survey found that more than half of the uninsured who shopped for an ObamaCare plan cited cost as the reason for not buying one.

There are better, more targeted, and far less expensive ways than ObamaCare to help those who truly need it.

High-risk pools, for example, were already providing backstop coverage in many states to those with high-cost illnesses. Tort reform, interstate insurance sales, health spending accounts and other private-sector reforms would make insurance more competitive and affordable.

But getting these done means first being honest with the public about just who the uninsured really are.


Read More At Investor's Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...at-lies-about-the-uninsured.htm#ixzz2xN7Ns1k2
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook
 

Calmye

Cali born Cali bred
Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
17,133
Reputation
-4,760
Daps
33,997
Reppin
So. Cal
Is it ACA raising premiums or insurance companies using it as an excuse to fukk over consumers
 

DonFrancisco

Your Favorite Tio!
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
1,350
Reputation
400
Daps
3,052
Reppin
Sabado Gigante
:ohhh: Dude is in Houston

Concierge medicine is great if you have money but I'm not sure how much it pays for ER visits, I'm talking about triage type visits. These fees don't cover triage and long-term treatment. I do however thing it has its place in medicine and in the delivery of healthcare to a wide array of people. After all the biggest cost to healthcare is inefficiency caused by segmented healthcare. Maybe an affordable model can use many of the ideas of concierge medicine. Honestly I think a regional ACO made up of ER, acute care hospitals, urgent care, and imaging centers would work. I know for a fact that in the place I work, we send people to an imaging center, this costs fractions of what it would cost at a hospital at a radiology department. Maybe equipping PCP doctors with the proper capital to have staff work closely with patients might be a possible solution. They could serve as a bridge in coordinating care. Honestly simple solution with as little value/supply chains as possible is the best way to bring good care with a lower price. Honestly I don't know.

Also one of the benefits to an ACO could be to have every member have a HSA where part of the premiums go to an account and when they are out of network they can use money from premiums to pay doctors.

I'm just throwing out ideas out there....sorry for going off topic.
 

KENNY DA COOKER

HARD ON HOES is not a word it's a LIFESTYLE
Supporter
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
31,450
Reputation
13,295
Daps
168,556
Reppin
F
I just checked out that Obamacare site out of curiosity...and for me as a single father raising one child on a 40,000 a year salary......it's kinda a expensive as far as premiums

:patrice:
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,978
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,069
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
so what's your take on this whole issue?
Insurance companies are needlessly driving cost up and blaming the ACA as far as I can tell... but there is so much that goes on behind the scenes in healthcare who really knows anymore. The ACA could actually be filled with tons of added cost that no one outside the inner circle knows about.
We really just have to wait and see.



 
Top