planet Bling-Bling

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
31,958
Reputation
2,692
Daps
44,033
A diamond bigger than Earth? | Reuters

r


Forget the diamond as big as the Ritz. This one's bigger than planet Earth.

Orbiting a star that is visible to the naked eye, astronomers have discovered a planet twice the size of our own made largely out of diamond.

The rocky planet, called '55 Cancri e', orbits a sun-like star in the constellation of Cancer and is moving so fast that a year there lasts a mere 18 hours.

Discovered by a U.S.-Franco research team, its radius is twice that of Earth's but it is much more dense with a mass eight times greater. It is also incredibly hot, with temperatures on its surface reaching 3,900 degrees Fahrenheit (1,648 Celsius).

"The surface of this planet is likely covered in graphite and diamond rather than water and granite," said Nikku Madhusudhan, the Yale researcher whose findings are due to be published in the journal Astrophysical Journal Letters.

The study - with Olivier Mousis at the Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planetologie in Toulouse, France - estimates that at least a third of the planet's mass, the equivalent of about three Earth masses, could be diamond.

Diamond planets have been spotted before but this is the first time one has been seen orbiting a sun-like star and studied in such detail.

"This is our first glimpse of a rocky world with a fundamentally different chemistry from Earth," Madhusudhan said, adding that the discovery of the carbon-rich planet meant distant rocky planets could no longer be assumed to have chemical constituents, interiors, atmospheres, or biologies similar to Earth.

David Spergel, an astronomer at Princeton University, said it was relatively simple to work out the basic structure and history of a star once you know its mass and age.

"Planets are much more complex. This 'diamond-rich super-Earth' is likely just one example of the rich sets of discoveries that await us as we begin to explore planets around nearby stars."

"Nearby" is a relative concept in astronomy. Any fortune-hunter not dissuaded by "The Diamond as Big as the Ritz", F.Scott Fitzgerald's jazz age morality tale of thwarted greed, will find Cancri e about 40 light years, or 230 trillion miles, from Park Avenue.
 

Cuban Pete

Aka 305DeadCounty
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,075
Reputation
8,111
Daps
70,677
Reppin
SOHH ICEY MONOPOLY
so if you go over there and survive.... would you be like thousands of years old in an earth year? or would your body start to wear and tear like a normal year after say 300 hours?
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,570
Reputation
17,753
Daps
147,187
Reppin
Humanity
so if you go over there and survive.... would you be like thousands of years old in an earth year? or would your body start to wear and tear like a normal year after say 300 hours?

no....it orbits its sun in 18 earth days.
it's complete orbit = 1 year for it
it's complete orbit = 18 earth days
 

Bud Bundy

A Bundy never cares
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,984
Reputation
1,620
Daps
22,442
so if you go over there and survive.... would you be like thousands of years old in an earth year? or would your body start to wear and tear like a normal year after say 300 hours?

I don't think the speed on a planet spinning has anything to do with the way our body decays? but who knows.
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,570
Reputation
17,753
Daps
147,187
Reppin
Humanity
I don't think the speed on a planet spinning as anything to do with the way our body decays? but who knows.

it doesn't...a year on a celestial body is determined by it's complete orbit around it's star. you will age at the same pace anywhere in the universe...putting aside the fact that the faster you move, the slower time is relative to slower moving objects....
 

Cuban Pete

Aka 305DeadCounty
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,075
Reputation
8,111
Daps
70,677
Reppin
SOHH ICEY MONOPOLY
it doesn't...a year on a celestial body is determined by it's complete orbit around it's star. you will age at the same pace anywhere in the universe...putting aside the fact that the faster you move, the slower time is relative to slower moving objects....

i thought gravity affected the aging process somewhat?
 

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,214
Reputation
10,267
Daps
59,771
Reppin
The Cosmos
Resources will be the reason humanity concurs space.

First stop: Mars, then the asteroid belt.

A moon base should have already been built.
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,570
Reputation
17,753
Daps
147,187
Reppin
Humanity
Resources will be the reason humanity concurs space.

First stop: Mars, then the asteroid belt.

A moon base should have already been built.


i agree, we should have had a colony on the moon 30 years ago with a population that is rotated out and back to earth every 3 months...shyt, we should have been launching from the moon instead of earth. lower gravity means less fuel to get off the surface.
 
Top