Passive/Reluctant Heroes In Fiction Unnapreciation

[bogey_j]

I hate those soft fakkits that hesitate or outright refuse to kill somebody, even if they're the most psychotic, hardened criminal killing machines. these characters hate fighting and will only act when pushed, even then they lack the balls to finish the job. reluctant/passive heroes are typically found in comics, cartoons, anime, videogames, live-action tv shows, etc. I despise these fukkers with a passion

unfortunately, after murking gale, jesse from breaking bad has turned into one of these pacifist fakkits. batman and superman has always been this way as well. and too many damn anime characters to name (like goku for example)

that's why I appreciate gully mouthafukkers like frank castle and spawn; they're not afraid to get a little blood on their hands. they're both realists and hardened criminals like the guys their fighting against. no misplaced sense of self-righteousness like gay ass batman

 

[AkaDemiK]

 

[Dooby]

That's why I didn't completely give Tony Montana "Da Gawd" character label

 

[Champion]

This is why I always preferred Vegeta over Goku.

 

[Ghostface Trillah]

"With great power comes great responsibility"

"Power without discipline leads to corruption"

 

[StatUS]

The point is the Superman's and Batman's of the world take upon morals to set an example that they are above those lowly criminals. They're idealist that think humans can be better than that if given an example.

Those anti-heroes are just realist who see society for what it is and do whatever it takes morals aside.

The reason those types are so popular is because we know the world is fukked up and not perfect so we look at those types as a reflection of us somewhat.

But those "soft feggits" look all of that in the eye and still think everything can be changed for the better. For them not to compromise their morals for anything has always made them the better characters to me.

 

[bogey_j]

The point is the Superman's and Batman's of the world take upon morals to set an example that they are above those lowly criminals. They're idealist that think humans can be better than that if given an example.

Those anti-heroes are just realist who see society for what it is and do whatever it takes morals aside.

The reason those types are so popular is because we know the world is fukked up and not perfect so we look at those types as a reflection of us somewhat.

But those "soft feggits" look all of that in the eye and still think everything can be changed for the better. For them not to compromise their morals for anything has always made them the better characters to me.

but its just unrealistic and gay

 

[StatUS]

but its just unrealistic and gay

There's more to a Super hero than just abnormal power. They're supposed to be above the norm and even then a good writer will put them ins situations where their morals could be compromised.

 

[Grifter]

you can't blame Batman or Superman for not killing their villains when the World's Justice System designed for that won't do it. Plus comic books would'nt even be around now if all the heroes killed the bad guys every time.