Part-time Wrestlers, a good or a bad thing for business? VOTE

Part-Timers?


  • Total voters
    26

Beautiful Bobby Eatin

SWEEEEEEEEEETNESS!
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,258
Reputation
2,962
Daps
43,439
Reppin
Terra Belle, Georgia
There is no problem with part time superstars at all. When your company refuses to build a new star because your last one still has mileage and merch sales then its the idiot running the show not the proven draw.
 

ryda518

Randy Orton=Legend Killer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
4,052
Reputation
321
Daps
5,405
Reppin
bx all day
the problem is the part timers who are big names are having matches with names that are already big

cena is cena , hell face anyone and it'll probably main event
same goes for punk

guys like sheams, barret, bryan, cesaro, etc. are the ones who have the potential but need that one match to push them to the next level
 

Tres Leches

Empire Business
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
24,652
Reputation
2,017
Daps
58,536
its good but damn stop putting them against terra ryzing and john cena ...the point is to let them work with some of the younger talent
 

Bud Bundy

A Bundy never cares
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,984
Reputation
1,632
Daps
22,465
They are good because they bring in new fans who might not other wise watch the product. I mean how many black people did MR.T bring in the 80's, The Rock bringing in people who watch his movies and so on.
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,794
Reputation
975
Daps
106,200
Seems like everyone's in agreement about the effect of part-timers and how they should be used for the good of the business. Its basically common sense...which makes the WWE's choice to not do so all the more bewildering.
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
124,127
Reputation
8,673
Daps
146,792
Reppin
Westcoast
This is a easy subject where even the dumbest and most dimwitted amongst us can simply understand. If the part timers didn't produce, there would be an agrument. But they do..the Rock not only produces but carrys the industry with not even 30 minutes of TV time a week. That's how special he is. Lesnar had an effect on Summerslam last year so he's still legitimate with fans after they fukked up during the Cena bullshyt.

As for the other way of looking at things..if you have any issue with their pushes or anyone else's lack of, who's fault is that? Vince McMahon. Paul Levasque. Stpehanie McMahon. They supposedly run the show and if a guy like Ziggler gets jobbed out to Cena after doing 5 finishers and getting a ton of interference, that just shows what the company thinks of him. It's not the Part timers that are the problem. It's the lazy and pathetic nature of the full timers that remain complacent and have will to be great. Mediocre isn't even the proper term. They're rats.

When Cripple H lands Bruno, he's congratulated. But when he pushes part timers and burys full timers to keep Cena as some kind of force of nature, people want to look the other way. Funny how backwards certain nyggas, who "aren't porn addicts" are, eh?:laugh:
 

Tide Run This

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
33,793
Reputation
2,240
Daps
63,252
Reppin
Garnet N Gold
Yeah how is it Rock or Lesnar's fault the WWE powers have no faith in the Dolph Ziggler's of the world. They gave him a fluke win at the PPV when he was pretty much the 3rd wheel in the Cena/AJ saga then job him out in embarrasing fashion the next 3 weeks via promos/matches where his entire offense got buried.


If Rock/Lesnar/Taker weren't doing business what would Mania be looking like right now? Garbage thats what. One of these smark forums seriously believed Ryback should be the guy that ended Punk's reign and won the belt at Mania. :russ:


A Rock vs Lesnar matchup is honestly more interesting than any full time WWE match they could pull off at Mania at this point. D-Bry is a true best in the world and they got him in comedy angles. How is that Rock or Lesnar's fault?

I'm not gonna cry for scrubs like Kofi Kingston that have been in the company for 6 years and not amounted to anything more that a spot monkey or for a guy like Cody Rhodes who is spinning around in circles career wise.

And it's funny how even when they gave these "breakout guys" the mania rub the crowds crapped all over them and didn't take em serious. Swagger,Miz and Sheamus all got put over within past 3 years and the only one that came out for the better was Sheamus.

If i'm paying 60/70 dollars for Mania it's gonna be for Rock,Lesnar,Bryan,Henry and Taker I don't give a damn if Zack Ryder,Kofi Kingston and these other hard working full timers can't get on the card fukk them.
 

Reggie

Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
91,412
Reputation
4,942
Daps
193,024
Reppin
Virginia
If they use the boost of having mainstrean attention with the Rock's and Lesnar's of the world to showcase some of their young talent then it can be a good thing.
 
Top