One of Europe’s Smallest Nations Tries a Big Idea: Free Public Transit

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
55,099
Reputation
8,185
Daps
155,721


Since 2020, residents of Luxembourg have been able to ride trains and buses throughout the country without buying tickets. Is the policy paying off?

Luxembourg launched a tram service in 2017 in an effort to get more residents out of their automobiles. 

Luxembourg launched a tram service in 2017 in an effort to get more residents out of their automobiles.
Photographer: Olivier Matthys/Bloomberg

By
Feargus O'Sullivan
July 7, 2022 at 9:06 AM EDT

Sometimes, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg looks so tidy and bucolic that walking down the street feels like strolling through an architect’s rendering.

Along the pristine streets of the tiny state’s capital, Luxembourg City, honey-colored sandstone buildings teeter improbably on the edge of ravines; new office towers full of financial services firms loom nearby. Riding a train out into the countryside prosperous-looking villages appear and disappear in the gaps between narrow, castle-topped valleys and fields of ripening corn.

Luxembourg’s roughly 640,000 citizens enjoy the world’s highest per capita income of any independent state (better even than tinier Monaco and Liechtenstein). But even this privileged pocket of Europe faces a few intractable problems. And one of them is cars.

relates to One of Europe’s Smallest Nations Tries a Big Idea: Free Public Transit

Both vehicles and trams use the double-decked Pont Adolphe bridge in Luxembourg City.
Photo by Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Nowhere else in the European Union is quite as car-crazy as Luxembourg, which has the highest vehicle density on the continent, with 696 cars per 1,000 people as of 2020. Almost nine out of ten Luxembourgish households have a car; one in ten families have three or more. Low tariffs and taxes gave Luxembourg the cheapest diesel in the EU and the cheapest gas in Western Europe. In small towns, you’ll find Ferrari and Maserati dealerships. Traffic often moves at a crawl, while Luxembourg City, charm aside, is a checkerboard of parking lots. This summer, police are begging citizens not to drive to inland lake beaches that are jammed with illegally parked cars. With its population set to surpass 690,000 by 2030, Luxembourg risks choking on its automobiles.

To curb its driving addiction, this small country is trying an ambitious idea: On Feb. 29, 2020, it became the first nation in the world to make all public transit entirely free at point of use. With the exception of (not especially popular) first-class tickets, no one has paid a cent to ride a bus, tram or train within Luxembourg’s borders ever since.

The Costs of Going Free​

The idea of charging passengers nothing to ride may seem like something only a tiny, rich country like Luxembourg could make feasible. (On top of pre-existing subsidies, the experiment will add 41 million euros ($43.4 million) to the government’s annual transportation costs.)

But free transit programs have emerged in all kinds of cities and countries over the years as a means of addressing rising energy costs or traffic. Rome experimented with free buses in 1971; Austin, Texas, tried it in 1989 and 1990; Kansas City’s bus and streetcar systems have been fare-less since 2020; and Boston Mayor Michelle Wu has vowed to “Free the T” throughout the Massachusetts city, starting with a trio of fare-free bus routes. One of the longest-running efforts has been in Estonia’s capital, Tallinn, which has had free public transit for residents since 2013, while Estonians also pay no fares for rural bus journeys. Ticket-less transit has also recently arrived in the cities of Dunkirk, France, and the Czech Republic’s Frýdek-Místek.

Perhaps the largest variation on the model to date, however, has been in Germany, where for the three months of summer 2022, the state is offering travel passes valid on all urban and regional services (but not faster intercity trains) for the close-to-token cost of 9 euros per month.

It's easy to see the appeal of these policies for governments seeking ways to slash carbon emissions and aid residents hit with high gas prices. In European regions, where relatively reliable train and bus services (and high subsidies to support them) are standard, such policies might play a role in getting people out of private cars. They remove mobility barriers for poorer citizens and, in a world striving to decarbonize, can also remind voters that a lower-emissions world can also offer conveniences and advantages, not just sacrifices.


Luxembourg launches free public transport

A train of the Luxembourg Railway enters the Pfaffenthal-Kirchberg station in 2020.
Photo: Oliver Dietze/dpa via Getty Images

Whether free transit works, however, depends on what your vision of “working” entails. For riders, abandoning tickets has certainly created a more frictionless system. It is now very easy to jump off a bus and on to a tram without needing to consider whether your ticket is still valid or where to get a new one. The sense of freedom is real: One owner of a cafe just a few minutes from Luxembourg City’s central station says that young people — and his teenage son in particular — are using the fare-less policy to go on jaunts around the country and discover it in ways that wouldn’t previously have been possible (a boon in a country where there isn’t a huge amount for young people to do).

Then again, paying fares was never a major burden for him — so lax were ticket-takers on buses and trams that he admits he stopped paying decades ago.

For other riders, though, the cost savings are more meaningful. “This policy is saving me close to 500 euros a year” says Max, a 26-year old special needs teacher who works in Luxembourg City but lives in France. (He asked Bloomberg CityLab not to use his last name.)

Sitting on a double-decker train rattling towards the French border city of Thionville, he acknowledges that, for him at least, the policy offered both financial and time advantages over driving. “It’s not just the cost that’s the issue,” he says. “If I drive home, there are so many jams and bottlenecks on the road towards the border it can take 60 to 75 minutes to get home. On the train I can make it in half that.”


The Car Remains King​

But while Luxembourgers generally express a positive attitude to the free transit policy, there is little evidence as yet that it has reduced the number of cars on the road. In May 2022, congestion on Luxembourg’s roads was — depending on location — largely equivalent to or higher than levels in May 2019, before the free public transit policy was introduced.

The reason for this, studies have shown, is that making transit free doesn’t in itself tempt people away from their cars. While removing fees may prove an incentive, it won’t compensate for other possible disadvantages, such as overcrowded, delayed or canceled trains — not uncommon in Luxembourg before the pandemic — or an inability to compete with the convenience of door-to-door travel. Meanwhile, data from elsewhere suggests that the most enthusiastic adopters of free travel policies tend to be people who would have otherwise walked or cycled.


 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
55,099
Reputation
8,185
Daps
155,721
To wean people off unsustainable levels of car dependency, you have to make driving more costly and difficult — something that Luxembourg’s center-left coalition government has so far been wary of doing. While fuel taxes were brought closer to standard European levels in 2021, some of these increases were temporarily put on hold in May 2022 as part of a government “solidarity package” to help citizens weather the energy crisis brought on by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Perhaps not surprisingly, under current projections the number of cars on the road in Luxembourg is, according to the 2035 Mobility Plan, set to increase by 6% by 2035, due to population growth.

Carrot Now, Stick Later​

The government’s approach is the right way to go for the time being, says Green Party member Francois Bausch, who is Luxembourg’s Minister for Mobility and Public Works. “It’s very important not to place too many burdens on drivers if there aren’t already very strong alternative ways to travel in place beforehand,” he said. “We would not want to create the kind of dissatisfaction that created the Yellow Vest protests they have had in France.”

Part of the challenge is that, even for those in close proximity to Luxembourg City, public transit coverage isn’t sufficient for many residents’ needs, and getting around exclusively via bus or train is an even bigger challenge outside the city center.

In an interview in 2021, Bausch said that “the challenge for modal shift is very simple: Make the other modes more attractive than the car.” To that end, the country has embarked on a series of transit service improvements, including a tramway in Luxembourg City that opened in 2017, with a new extension launching this September and four lines set to be added by 2030. Meanwhile, as part of the country’s mobility plan for 2035, Luxembourg will embark on 14 major rail improvements and redesign urban street plans while also introducing bus rapid transit and carpooling lanes on main roads.

Beyond the traffic and pollution improvements, encouraging more transit uptake by dropping fares in Luxembourg helps address a social equity issue, Bausch says: “The policy establishes a principle that people’s access to transport should not be restricted by their income.”

But some critics have observed that offering free transit still leaves them with a serious barrier to economic advancement: housing affordability.

Managing the Daily Exodus​

Luxembourg’s roads aren’t packed just because of the popularity of car ownership: A huge proportion of the grand duchy’s workers live outside the country’s borders. A total of 46% of Luxembourg’s workforce consists of international commuters. Around 110,000 come from France, with a further 50,000 each coming from Germany and Belgium.

Many live just across the border because of high housing costs. In 2021, the average rent in the cities of southern Luxembourg was a little over 1,200 euros ($1,354). In border towns such as Belgium’s Arlon, rents average around 700 euros (and even here rents are higher than elsewhere in Belgium due to the town’s proximity to Luxembourg).

FRANCE-LUXEMBOURG-ECONOMY-TRANSPORT-REAL ESTATE-WORKERS-RAIL-CRO

A traffic jam in Dudelange, Luxembourg, in 2018. Rush-hour congestion is frequent near the French border.
Photo by Jean-Christophe Verhaegen/AFP via Getty Images

The result: a daily mass exodus in and out of the country that clogs roads and packs rush hour trains across the border, leaving Luxembourg City notably quieter when work hours are over. This is arguably the greatest divide in the country — between those who can afford to live inside the borders and those who can’t. Abolishing fares is thus seen by some a modest transportation subsidy for those who have been obliged by high living costs to locate themselves outside Luxembourg.

But Constance Carr, an urban geographer at the University of Luxembourg, suggests that the no-ticket policy might nonetheless leave these people at a disadvantage: Now that they don’t pay directly into the system, they can’t complain about poor service.


“Addressing the housing issue would be a greater social equity objective, if that is what the free public transit policy is actually trying to do,” she told Bloomberg CityLab via Zoom. “Everybody knows housing is too expensive and that it should be addressed, but nobody does, so the process starts over again like a merry-go-round. But while housing is a perennial political debate here, free public transit is not — no one was actually asking for this policy. It just arrived without much at all in the way of public discussion.”

Given these criticisms — that free transit has yet to succeed either as a means of reducing traffic or easing inequality — it might seem that the Luxembourg’s policy is not one other places should consider emulating. But that’s not necessarily the case. What does seem clear is that any city or region considering complete public transit subsidies should be upfront about what such policies can and can’t deliver. Merely eliminating tickets won’t work as a stand-alone policy for greater sustainability and social equity; it needs to be joined by other efforts, such as more stringent restrictions on car use or more generous housing benefits that allow more people who work in the area to live nearby. And those kinds of changes may be politically harder to implement and more costly to sustain.

So while riders like Max appreciate the modest windfall, he’d be even happier if he could lose his international commute entirely.

“I would love to live in Luxembourg — it has a great social system and living standard, especially compared to France right now, where everything is a complete mess,” he says. “Luxembourg is also where my grandfather is from, so I’ve always had a connection. But with the prices for housing being what they are, I’m not sure that’s ever going to be possible for me.
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
64,330
Reputation
15,720
Daps
281,978
Interesting

One benefit is that is all that foot traffic would really help profits of physical store front store Retail

And they can plaster ads on the train to promote businesses as well

Not a bad idea. Have to see the end result if it worked or not though
 

MajesticLion

Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Messages
28,825
Reputation
4,771
Daps
63,087
Got to scale down your thinking for something like this to work. Municipalities/cities only.
 

CopiousX

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
11,509
Reputation
3,382
Daps
55,923
This really only works if you can keep the bums off the transit. Those euro nations dont have the density of homeless and mentally ill people we have in the US. Bums scare off normal people.


I recall flying into denver, and noticing how well their transit system operated from the airport. Once you leave the airport, and get to their main commercial area (i think its called 16th street mall) which is 10 blocks long of just walking area with very few parking spots, there is free transit. But i noticed none of the locals using it. I got on once out of curiousity, and the nasty bum smell was enough to send me back outside that bus instantly.



I personally wish we could limit public services including parks, libraries, transit systems only to the citizens that have recently filed a W2 or can provide a paystub (and their dependents). Public infrastructure but only for income tax payers.:wow:
 
Last edited:

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,019
Reputation
8,207
Daps
194,454
Reppin
BX, NYC
MTA should be free or deducted from people’s city taxes.

shyt farehopping is at an All-Time high with bigger three door buses and police being more lax with the tickets underground.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
55,099
Reputation
8,185
Daps
155,721

France: Free public transport takes off in Montpellier​

Lisa Louis

02/21/2024
February 21, 2024

Montpellier is now the biggest metropolitan area in Europe where residents can take public transport for free. Many locals are thrilled, but others worry there won't be cash left to develop the transport network further.

Passengers sitting on a bus
68280597_1006.webp

A free public transport scheme in Montpellier, France is encouraging locals to leave their cars at homeImage: Lisa Louis/DW


Since the 21st of December 2023, the half a million inhabitants of the southern French city of Montpellier and its surroundings no longer have to pay for public transport. Many of them are pleased with the measure – but there are caveats.

Thirty-one-year-old Rayene Chabbi is relieved she no longer has to pay for the bus and the tram she takes to work on weekdays, like on a recent Monday morning.

In the past, she'd often drive her parents' car the seven kilometers (four miles) to the office.

"Free public transport is a really good idea – especially for people like me who think twice before spending €50 ($54) on a monthly subscription. I only earn €1,950 gross each month," she told DW while waiting for her bus.

"It's similar for my sister who now also uses public transport," she added.

68280404_906.webp
Local Rayene Chabbi, 31, in her office in Montpellier

Rayene Chabbi says free public transport means she no longer drives her parents' car to the officeImage: Lisa Louis/DW

Less stress, better for the environment​

Half an hour later, Chabbi gets off a tram in Montpellier's northeastern neighborhood of Castelnau-le-Lez.

"Taking the car would have taken at least ten minutes longer and I would certainly have been stuck in traffic jams. I like this stress-free way of traveling. Plus, I'm protecting the environment," she said while walking the few hundred meters to the company Simax, where Chabbi works as the manager's assistant.

The mid-sized company, which provides management software for businesses, co-finances the free public transport scheme via a two-percent wage tax, as do about 2,500 other companies in Montpellier that employ 11 staff or more. Overall, the measures cost €30 million ($32 million). That's compared to the city's total budget of €1 billion.

CEO Miren Lafourcade doesn't mind paying up – on the contrary.

"Our company used to be in an area with poor public transport connections. That's why we moved to this location, which is just a 3-minute walk from a tram stop. For once, the taxes we pay are being used for something that benefits society," she told DW.

Simax currently employs 60 people and has an annual turnover of €1.5 million ($1.6 million). It aims to recruit up to ten more staff this year – with sustainability, which includes public transport, set to remain a crucial element of its expansion plans.

68280632_906.webp
A tram drives through the city of Montpellier in France

The project is co-funded through a 2% wage tax on companies with more than 11 employeesImage: Lisa Louis/DW

Part of larger climate adaptation scheme​

Julie Frêche, vice-president of the metropolis of Montpellier and in charge of transport matters, is pleased with such efforts.

"We aim to implement positive environmental politics. Free public transport increases citizens' purchasing power," she said to DW.

"Plus, the measure improves air quality," Frêche added.

Montpellier is also taking other climate adaptation measures – especially as temperatures here can reach almost 50 degrees Celsius in the summer.

The city is planting greenery and will add 50,000 trees by 2026.

"We are also constructing 235 kilometers of additional bike lanes and adding five bus routes to the 41 existing ones and a fifth tram line," Frêche stressed.

68280525_906.webp
Julie Frêche, vice-president of the metropolis of Montpellier, France

Vice president of the metropolis of Montpellier Julie Frêche says free public transport gives purchasing power back to citizensImage: Lisa Louis/DW

But not everywhere in Montpellier is served in the same way​

That new tramway will also connect Saint-Jean-de-Vedas. The neighboring town, part of greater Montpellier, has about 12,000 residents – and counting. Numerous new apartment blocks are springing up here.

That's why Hugo Daillan thinks more public transport connections will be needed.

The 28-year-old lives in central Montpellier and works in a flower shop in Saint-Jean-de-Vedas. He's traveling with a group of public transport passengers when he speaks with DW.

"This is Saint-Jean-de-Vedas' only tram stop. The tram only runs every 15 minutes, even though at the end of the workday, people need to get home. And so many people here take the car instead. The transport connection is so bad, that the local town hall has set up a shuttle in one district – which you have to pay for," Daillon told DW while pointing at the destination board.

He also stressed that the "free" public transport scheme wasn't actually free.

"The price we are paying is that that money can't be invested in expanding the current transport network," he said.

"When making public transport free, you need to make sure all parts of the city have access to the transport network, especially in a growing city like this one. Or else you only please people in the well-connected center and forget about those living in the outskirts," Daillan said.

Alexandre Brun, lecturer for geography at Montpellier's University Paul-Valéry, agrees with that view.

"The city should also build new connections between suburbs so that you no longer have to travel through the city center to get to another suburb," Brun told DW.

He also fears the wage tax could deter companies from setting up offices in Montpellier.

"And we still need additional companies to bring down unemployment," he added.

Montpellier's unemployment rate stood at 9.6% in 2023, about two points above the national average.

Drivers and economists are fans​

But drivers questioned in Saint-Jean-de-Vedas seemed to welcome the free transport scheme – at least those who don't have to commute to the city center.

"It's very convenient. I now regularly take public transport to go shopping in the city center," Claire Maurin, a 40-year-old nursery school teacher told DW.

Pierre Chanal, 66, was getting out of his car a few meters further down the road.

"Traffic is intense in the city center and parking fees are high," the pensioner told DW. He said that taking public transport is a lot faster and more relaxed.

Fady Hamadé, economist and director of Montpellier-based think tank Institute of Environmental Resources and Sustainable Development Economists, shares that enthusiasm.

"Like every public service, this is a tool for income redistribution," he told DW.

"It has positive external effects. It lowers the city's CO2 emissions and pollution. It also seems to be leading to new shops opening and more social diversity in the city center, as it's easier for people to get around," he added.

Edited by: Kristie Pladson
 
Top