Old-school Wi-Fi Is Slowing Down Networks, Cisco Says

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,972
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,065
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
alphadogg writes "The early Wi-Fi standards that opened the world's eyes to wire-free networking are now holding back the newer, faster protocols that followed in their wake, Cisco Systems said. The IEEE 802.11 standard, now available in numerous versions with speeds up to 6.9Gbps and growing, still requires devices and access points to be compatible with technologies that date to the late 1990s. But those older standards — the once-popular 802.11b and an even slower spec from 1997 — aren't nearly as efficient as most Wi-Fi being sold today. As a result, Cisco thinks the 802.11 Working Group and the Wi-Fi Alliance should find a way to let some wireless gear leave those versions behind. Two Cisco engineers proposed that idea last week in a presentation at the working group's meeting in Los Angeles. The plan is aimed at making the best use of the 2.4GHz band, the smaller of two unlicensed frequency blocks where Wi-Fi operates."
 

rantanamo

All Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
4,385
Reputation
490
Daps
8,064
Reppin
NULL
they weren't talkin that shyt until they bought out Meraki's technology. Now they trying to ether everyone else?
 

Yapdatfool

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
8,422
Reputation
1,134
Daps
22,127
Reppin
NULL
Sounds like a cash grab by Cisco. They could still sell the outdated stuff, then make newer things that do just that, ultimately having businesses purchase separate devices for separate uses instead of just one device to handle both.

Logically, the slow down in networks involve a lot of pieces.
Does there exist wireless access points that can use fiber properly? Can the server(s) handle that much bandwidth? Can the devices the uses use even get close to gigabit speeds in the first place?
 

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,616
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,451
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
You need to upgrade your service. Network down emergencies get more priority

yeah, they do. we could have had a guy actually come in but the problem got fixed. I'm not even sure of the configuration we have here. It's convoluted. It basically led to our email hosts and cisco playing the blame game with each other saying the other was at fault.
 
Top