It’s a false equivalency to say that a few Israel Soldiers using PALESTINIAN (not their own people mind you) people as human shields as the same as the widespread practice of “human shields” when you purposely place military equipment and bases into the civilian population to deter an enemy due to civilian collateral damage concerns….You just argueing in bad faith.
are you under the impression that a human shield is supposed to be from your own side? Using an innocent that the other side values is the most common example of a human shield. Which is all the more reason why Israel's claim that Hamas is using human shields is so patently ridiculous. Israel doesn't view Palestinians as humans, so they just shoot/bomb/massacre through the alleged human shield. They've been doing this for decades, Hamas knows Israel has no problem murdering Palestinian children and innocents, so they obviously know using their own civilians as human shields wouldn't be effective at all, as we've all plainly seen over the past year to the tune of 50k+ dead Palestinians.
I'm not talking about a few isolated incidents of Israeli soldiers using Palestinians as human shields, I'm talking about a systematic, widespread practice in the IDF as outlined by Amnesty International, the UN, and just about every major human rights organization operating in the region. Go read the Goldstone report.
And you mention purposely placing military bases into civilian population areas...can you tell the rest of the class where the IDF headquarters are located? Gaza is one of the most densely populated areas in the world, so it's not like there is just abundant land to place Hamas military locations, what's Israel's excuse?
There u go again argueing in bad faith
southern Lebanon was a hotbed for Palestinian terrorism and they regularly used the southern Lebanon to attack Israel. So of course Israel was going to invade..u make it sound like Israel just woke up and be like hmmm let me invade Lebanon…Israel never had any intent on taking over Lebanon land..it was purely militarily..
I'm aware of Israel's rationale for invading and occupying Southern Lebanon. You'll notice I wasn't making a judgment on the decision to invade, I was merely correcting the record on the order of operations and framing of Hezbollah inserting themselves into Israel's affairs. And to that point about correcting the record, your claim that Israel never had any intent of taking over Lebanese land is not accurate when Israel to this day still occupies the Shebaa Farms. One of the primary goals of their invasion of Lebanon was to decapitate the power base of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon and install a pro-Israeli Maronite Phalangist government, so no this wasn't just a military excursion, there were political aims behind it. Zionism is an expansionist ideology. For many Zionists much of Lebanon is included in Greater Israel.
terrorist fan boys like yourself never let terrorists take responsibility for their actions…
It's been 20+ years since the inception of Bush-era War on Terror mania and you're still parroting braindead right-wing phraseology. Grow up.
Hezbollah once again jumping the gun and shooting rockets at Israel need to be taken in context to the larger war
literally cause and effect, if Hezbollah didn’t attack Israel in October their whole command structure would still be alive..they literally didn’t have to.
See, this right here is the reason your posts and arguments are built on a house of cards and so easily dismantled. You have an allergic reaction to the application of context and instead opt for the cause and effect analysis of someone who cannot see beyond 1 proceeding or preceding event, rendering you effectively blind. Your notion that if Hezbollah didn't respond to Israel's illegal actions in October is as spurious as it is pointless. Hezbollah is a resistance organization. What are they going to do but resist?
I think everybody here knows who wanted the larger war based on October 7th..
Yeah I think absent the contingent of anti-Arab, Islamophobic, Zionist bootlicking posters, everyone in here has accepted the plainly obvious conclusion that Israel has been agitating for a larger regional war.
Blaming Israel for having the Iron Dome
Who did this? It's not blaming Israel to point out that the presence of the Iron Dome changes the tactical and moral consideration of the situation. It means they have to act in accordance with their advantage. This is a very basic, widely accepted principle in not just warfare but any conflict.
Speaking about morality and international law when it comes to terrorists groups who hide inside the civilian population.
dealing with"terrorists" is exactly when morality and international law are
most needed. The idea that you can't just commit any savage act because of the nature of your enemy is morality 101. Morality and international law don't change depending on the enemy, they are immutable standards designed to make sure there isn't a race to the bottom of depravity. And again, even in your formulation you acknowledge there are civilians present, so what about their rights? Why are you free to forfeit the rights of the innocent?
And now u finish it off by making a case for why human shields so effective
but u put all the blame on Israel instead of the people hiding missiles in schools..
Israel has been under no actual threat from these "missiles" hiding in schools. You're just a credulous mark who fell for Israel's racist gambit as they engage on a campaign of ethnic cleansing and genocide. Sorry.