This monumental L deserves to be highlighted and preserved for future generations. Take him off ignore and come look at this sh*t.
Here's the story: in the "'Alternative' Trump/Russia" thread, @Call Me James posts a Daily Beast article about Jerome Corsi retracting his statements on Seth Rich.
@newworldafro , assuming the story is false (most likely because he didn't read it), jumps in and deflects hardbody. :bpfacepalm:
The Daily Beast article actually linked directly to an InfoWars article, written by Corsi, on 3-6-2019.
I decided to chime in. :stephena1:
@newworldafro doubles down, saying that the DB article is a lie--apparently not recognizing the blatant contradiction staring him in the face. :bpfacepalm:
My brain nearly explodes at this brazen display of ignorance.
What follows is the most pathetic spin job I've ever seen.
If you read closely, you can tell he knows he f*cked up, but can't admit it. :mjlolfacepalm:
I called him out on his sh*t. :bpufedup:
And for the cherry on top, here's a tweet from Corsi, confirming the story's accuracy. :bpbanderas:
If you have any other examples of this clown's sh*tty argumentation, feel free to post it here. :stephena1:
Here's the story: in the "'Alternative' Trump/Russia" thread, @Call Me James posts a Daily Beast article about Jerome Corsi retracting his statements on Seth Rich.
Seth Rich was a DNC staffer who was killed in 2016. He has been at the center of a right-wing conspiracy revolving around the DNC hack that occurred in 2015-2016.
The conspiracy alleges that the emails stolen and dumped to Wikileaks were stolen by Rich himself, not Russian hackers, and that Rich was effectively murdered by the DNC. This snipes at one of the key components of the Trump/Russia investigation, namely the major cyberattacks conducted by the Kremlin.
To proponents of this theory, this would prove that the DNC is scapegoating Russian hackers to save face from having their emails leaked. Not to mention covering up a murder.
The conspiracy alleges that the emails stolen and dumped to Wikileaks were stolen by Rich himself, not Russian hackers, and that Rich was effectively murdered by the DNC. This snipes at one of the key components of the Trump/Russia investigation, namely the major cyberattacks conducted by the Kremlin.
To proponents of this theory, this would prove that the DNC is scapegoating Russian hackers to save face from having their emails leaked. Not to mention covering up a murder.
I guess we can bush this
The people who started the conspiracy Are again admitting it was fake. :DameMJLol:
:youmadcam:
@newworldafro , assuming the story is false (most likely because he didn't read it), jumps in and deflects hardbody. :bpfacepalm:
Jerome Corsi doesn't work for InfoWars anymore.
So Infowars didn't retract anything. Jerome Corsi isn't the only writer for the site that talked about Seth Rich.
The author, who seems to be under some type of pressure just said he doesn't believe anything he wrote.
The Daily Beast article actually linked directly to an InfoWars article, written by Corsi, on 3-6-2019.
I decided to chime in. :stephena1:
This was posted on InfoWars website yesterday, written by Jerome Corsi.
Retraction of Dr. Jerome Corsi Regarding The Murder of Seth Rich
So unless he wrote than and was immediately fired afterwards, you're full of shyt
@newworldafro doubles down, saying that the DB article is a lie--apparently not recognizing the blatant contradiction staring him in the face. :bpfacepalm:
Exactly. A September 2018 article says Jerome Corsi doesn't work for Infowars.
Keep being fooled, brehs.
So the article yall are reading in March 2019 is blatantly lying to you and you had no clue
My brain nearly explodes at this brazen display of ignorance.
So wait, I'm confused.
Is the InfoWars article written by Jerome Corsi yesterday retracting his Seth Rich theories lying?
Cognitive dissonance is something else
What follows is the most pathetic spin job I've ever seen.
If you read closely, you can tell he knows he f*cked up, but can't admit it. :mjlolfacepalm:
They're posting it doesn't mean he is being paid by InfoWars. Listen. I actually listen to the show on the daily.
A.Jones has talked shiit about Jerome Corsi for over half a year now, saying they must have something on him, for him to flip the script in such a major way.
Yes, it's posted on InfoWars, but as the September 2018 article notes he at least was not working for them back then.
Doesn't change the fact that the story is odd.
I called him out on his sh*t. :bpufedup:
Do you recognize how inconsistent your argument is?
Jerome Corsi doesn't work for InfoWars anymore. So Infowars didn't retract anything.
They're posting it doesn't mean he is being paid by InfoWars.
"InfoWars didn't retract anything and Corsi doesn't work for them" :infocrazy:Yes, it's posted on InfoWars, but as the September 2018 article notes he at least was not working for them back then.
"Ok, so InfoWars printed Corsi's retraction yesterday but that doesn't mean they paid him and if he wasn't paid he technically didn't work for them" :infocrazy:
"And Corsi was not working for InfoWars in September 2018 so I was somehow right despite a direct contradiction staring directly at me" :infocrazy:
It's be easier to admit you were mistaken, rather than twisting yourself into these logical knots.
And for the cherry on top, here's a tweet from Corsi, confirming the story's accuracy. :bpbanderas:
Doesn't change the fact that the story is odd.
If you have any other examples of this clown's sh*tty argumentation, feel free to post it here. :stephena1:
Last edited: