New FAA rule requires Remote ID for drones

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
52,329
Reputation
7,979
Daps
150,079
TechCrunch is now a part of Verizon Media

Brian Heater@bheater / 4:34 PM EST•December 28, 2020
GettyImages-497884595.jpg


Image Credits: Richard Newstead (opens in a new window) / Getty Images

The FAA today announced that it will be issuing two new rules for drone pilots in the U.S. The first is the implementation of a long-awaited Remote ID. The system effectively works as a kind of digital license plate for unmanned aircraft, broadcasting identifying details, including the location of the craft.

The full text of the finalized new rule can be found here. In short, drone operators will have one of three methods for complying:

1. Operate a standard Remote ID drone that broadcasts identification and location information of the drone and control station;

2. Operate a drone with a Remote ID broadcast module (may be a separate device attached to the drone), which broadcasts identification, location, and take-off information; or

3. Operate a drone without Remote ID but at specific FAA-recognized identification areas.

While some drone operators are likely to be put off by additional regulations, their arrival is understandable given the sheer volume and speed of drone adoption. The FAA says that more than 1.7 million drones have been registered in the U.S., along with around 203,000 certifications for drone pilots. Those numbers will likely only snowball as more drones are deployed for commercial purposes.

Notably, the FAA sees the new rules as a method for accelerating drone deliveries in the U.S. “The new rules make way for the further integration of drones into our airspace by addressing safety and security concerns,” FAA Administrator Steve dikkson said in a release tied to the news. “They get us closer to the day when we will more routinely see drone operations such as the delivery of packages.”

Also new is the “Operations Over People and at Night” rule, which, as the name implies, regulates both the ability to fly over people and fly at night. The rule features a number of different qualifications for compliance, including weighing less than 0.55 pounds to fly overhead.

According to the rule, “small unmanned aircraft must not cause injury to a human being that is equivalent to or greater than the severity of injury caused by a transfer of 25 foot-pounds of kinetic energy upon impact from a rigid object, does not contain any exposed rotating parts that could lacerate human skin upon impact with a human being, and does not contain any safety defects.”

In order to fly at night, drones need to sport operational anti-collision lights that can been see for three miles. The rules are set to be officially published next month, officially becoming effective 60 days later. Drone makers will have a year-and-a-half to begin adding Remote ID to their devices. In August, the FAA granted Amazon permission for delivery trials.
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
102,466
Reputation
13,289
Daps
241,727
people tucked away in trailer parks using drones to look in neighboring residential homes among other means to spy

the way these things can carry weight its only a matter of time before fukkery kicks off
 

Kamikaze Revy

Bwana ni mwokozi wangu
Supporter
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
29,666
Reputation
9,366
Daps
75,967
Reppin
Outer Heaven
people tucked away in trailer parks using drones to look in neighboring residential homes among other means to spy

the way these things can carry weight its only a matter of time before fukkery kicks off
I fly drones for my production business and do work with the city. I met with the Norfolk PD to talk about their drone operations and they said they’re really concerned about the potential for terrorist activity with drones. It’s a valid concern
 

Wildin

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
20,687
Reputation
6,382
Daps
63,513
I met with the Norfolk PD to talk about their drone operations and they said they’re really concerned about the potential for terrorist activity with drones. It’s a valid concern

Umm considering various police departments in the US already currently utilize drones that could be deemed "terrorist equipment" in the "wrong" hands or "unlicensed", I'd say they are telling you the truth.

They've had drones with FLIR for years.
 

Kamikaze Revy

Bwana ni mwokozi wangu
Supporter
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
29,666
Reputation
9,366
Daps
75,967
Reppin
Outer Heaven
Umm considering various police departments in the US already currently utilize drones that could be deemed "terrorist equipment" in the "wrong" hands or "unlicensed", I'd say they are telling you the truth.

They've had drones with FLIR for years.
For sure. Interestingly enough, the cop I was meeting with explained that as it stands, they have no jurisdiction/authority whatsoever to do anything about a drone. It’s 100% an FAA issue. He said they are working with the feds now to get laws in place that give them the authority to enforce some drone laws themselves. He said right now, all they can do is look for bs reasons like “trespassing” or “disturbing the peace” if they want someone to land their drone and get out of an area. He specifically mentioned that recently they had a sniper team covering the arrival of some foreign dignitaries and there was someone flying over the event with a drone. He said it was frustrating because there was literally nothing they could do about it even though they had legitimate security/safety concerns.
I’ve been saying it for years. Irresponsible hobbyists with no regard for common sense or the law we’re going to force the government to crack down on drones and it’s happening right now.
 

Wildin

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
20,687
Reputation
6,382
Daps
63,513
For sure. Interestingly enough, the cop I was meeting with explained that as it stands, they have no jurisdiction/authority whatsoever to do anything about a drone. It’s 100% an FAA issue. He said they are working with the feds now to get laws in place that give them the authority to enforce some drone laws themselves. He said right now, all they can do is look for bs reasons like “trespassing” or “disturbing the peace” if they want someone to land their drone and get out of an area. He specifically mentioned that recently they had a sniper team covering the arrival of some foreign dignitaries and there was someone flying over the event with a drone. He said it was frustrating because there was literally nothing they could do about it even though they had legitimate security/safety concerns.
I’ve been saying it for years. Irresponsible hobbyists with no regard for common sense or the law we’re going to force the government to crack down on drones and it’s happening right now.

You're right.

Look at it this way. Police or government don't want regular people to float a drone over say a traffic stop involving police, yet police want the authority to float a drone over your house for surveillance. Like if you have a warrant rather than a helicopter or knock and talk with warrant they can park a few blocks away and float a drone.

It's a slippery slope. There are armed drones too and of course they want to use those against us but don't want us to have them.
 
Top