Nestle Chairman: Water is Not a Human Right, That's Extremist, Privatization is Best

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
Nestlé chairman says water is not a human right....and then some. | White Crow Farm ProjectWhite Crow Farm Project

In a candid interview for the documentary We Feed the World, Nestlé Chairman Peter Brabeck makes the astonishing claim that water isn’t a human right. He attacks the idea that nature is good, and says it is a great achievement that humans are now able to resist nature’s dominance. He attacks organic agriculture and says genetic modification is better.

Nestlé is the world’s biggest bottler of water. Brabeck claims – correctly – that water is the most important raw material in the world. However he then goes on to say that privatisation is the best way to ensure fair distribution. He claims that the idea that water is a human right comes from “extremist” NGOs. Water is a foodstuff like any other, and should have a market value.



He believes that the ultimate social responsibility of any Chairman is to make as much profit as possible, so that people will have jobs.

And just to underline what a lovely man he is, he also thinks we should all be working longer and harder.

Consequences of water privatisation

The consequences of water privatisation have been devastating on poor communities around the world. In South Africa, where the municipal workers’ union SAMWU fought a long battle against privatisation, there has been substantial research (pdf) about the effects. Water privatisation lead to a massive cholera outbreak in Durban in the year 2000.

The Nestlé boycott

Nestlé already has a very bad reputation among activists. There has been a boycott call since 1977. This is due to Nestlé’s aggressive lobbying to get women to stop breastfeeding – which is free and healthy – and use infant formula (sold by Nestlé) instead. Nestlé has lobbied governments to tell their health departments to promote formula. In poor countries, this has resulted in the deaths of babies, as women have mixed formula with contaminated water instead of breastfeeding.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dirty_Jerz

Ethiop
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
12,602
Reputation
-820
Daps
11,376
Reppin
the evils of truth, and love
wow, corruption ceases to try and amaze me everyday

we should all work together to ensure that water is private from other humans because we have evolved to "resist" the dominance of nature, i can only imagine what the scientists who back this guy are saying behind closed doors


edit: directly quoted from him "15 years of eating GMO foods and not a single illness has occured to date" is there any accuracy in this statement?
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
:manny:

I don't see the problem.

In an oligopoly, which is what the water-bottling industry is, there is nothing free or market-like about distribution, and thus nothing remotely fair about it either. Extend that to the element of water itself, and you've got what is essentially a centralized, authoritarian scheme that robs people of access while filling the pockets of a very small number of people. The research on this subject already validates that water privatization has been disastrous when implemented.

There are some basic cases in which private monopolies are universally detested. Even Milton Friedman thought some utilities should be government-dominated, for example. And look at the issues with privatization in other controversial areas. Gene-patenting is doing little good while seriously slowing down progress in the search for cures for HIV, various cancers, etc. That kind of stagnation is inevitable when you privatize indiscriminately.

All that aside, though, Nestle is an awful company with a long list of deporable behavior in its past and present, so this is the last source one should trust with regard to things like "fair distribution."
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
43,855
Reputation
2,773
Daps
107,185
Reppin
NULL
In an oligopoly, which is what the water-bottling industry is, there is nothing free or market-like about distribution, and thus nothing remotely fair about it either. Extend that to the element of water itself, and you've got what is essentially a centralized, authoritarian scheme that robs people of access while filling the pockets of a very small number of people.

There are some basic cases in which private monopolies are universally detested. Even Milton Friedman thought some utilities should be government-dominated, for example. And look at the issues with privatization in other controversial areas. Gene-patenting is doing little good while seriously slowing down progress in the search for cures for HIV, various cancers, etc. That kind of stagnation is inevitable when you privatize indiscriminately.

All that aside, though, Nestle is an awful company with a long list of deporable behavior in its past and present, so this is the last source one should trust with regard to things like "fair distribution."

If Nestle could have their way, they would regulate oxygen and sell it.
 

kash10003

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
10,534
Reputation
1,050
Daps
13,625
Reppin
NULL
don't agree with the concept as a whole, but he explained things pretty well, with his bias of course but it wasn't just random retard shyt
 

Bud Bundy

A Bundy never cares
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,984
Reputation
1,632
Daps
22,461
This dude is trying to own water. Is dude trying to start a war.
 
Top