Alas, we’ve reached the stage in the drama where financial analysts, at least, think it’s time for Zaslav to move on. “Either way, it’s going to hurt,” said Michael Nathanson, a senior research analyst at MoffettNathanson. “Given the pressures on linear, he has to have a more flexible cost base. His company doesn’t have the scale of Disney or Comcast, so he can’t compete at those prices. He just can’t.”
In fact, LightShed Partners media and technology analyst Richard Greenfield believes Zaslav has already made his decision to walk, even if he hasn’t said so publicly. “For Zaz, the problem is that spending $2.5 billion or more versus $1.2 billion for half the number of games and a substantial reduction in playoff games—the math is so problematic,” Greenfield said. “Saying no to the NBA makes sense as long as you believe it doesn’t lead you to being dropped. The multibillion-dollar question is: Does Zaz have enough confidence that he can convince cable operators not to drop his channels.”
Zaz Brain
Zaslav put on a brave face at today’s Bernstein conference, hyping WBD’s other sports assets: March Madness, MLB playoffs, NHL playoffs (including the Stanley Cup Finals every other year), NASCAR, College Football Playoffs, and U.S. soccer. WBD, it would seem, has enough popular sports to prevent cable and satellite operators from dropping them in the immediate future, or cutting their payouts to WBD significantly.
Even with all the other sports that it has, however, WBD’s executives cannot be Pollyannaish about this turn of events. Historically, company executives have believed that the distributors valued the NBA far more than the other sports—and paid for it—because they did. “The working assumption for the people who are at Turner, and the old Time Warner analysts like myself, was that the NBA was a key feature of their negotiating clout,” Nathanson said.