Musk Ally Demands Admin Access to System That Lets Government Text the Public

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,092
Reputation
8,816
Daps
138,961
Totalitarian regime being setup. We about to be China with a white supremacist/apartheid flavor. Get ready..

Musk Ally Demands Admin Access to System That Lets Government Text the Public​


Musk Ally Demands Admin Access to System That Lets Government Text the Public​


Jason Koebler Jason Koebler
· Feb 18, 2025 at 2:20 PM

A worker resigned in protest rather than giving Thomas Shedd access to Notify.gov, which they said would allow him to see "all personally identifiable information moving through the Notiy system, including phone numbers," 404 Media has learned.
Musk Ally Demands Admin Access to System That Lets Government Text the Public




A worker at the General Services Administration told colleagues in a Slack message Tuesday that they have resigned in protest after Elon Musk ally Thomas Shedd requested “admin/root access to all components of the Notify.gov system,” which is a government system used to send mass text messages to the public that contains information the worker said is highly sensitive and would give Shedd unilateral, private access to the personal data of members of the public.

Shedd is a former Tesla engineer who now runs Technology Transformation Services (TTS), a group of coders and software engineers within the GSA, who is closely allied with Elon Musk and DOGE. Notify.gov contains not just the phone numbers of everyday people but also information about whether they participate in government programs such as Medicaid, which is based on a person's financial situation. In recent days, Musk has become obsessed with the idea of "fraud" in Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, and in identifying those he suspects are committing fraud.

“The TTS commissioner, Thomas Shedd, has required us to provide admin/root access to all components of the Notify.gov system,” the Slack message, seen by 404 Media starts. It then says this would allow Shedd to “view all personally identifiable information (PII) moving through the Notify system, including phone numbers and variable data for members of the public.” It says Shedd “would be able to download and store this data without anybody else receiving a notification.”

“I don’t believe that I can operate a program and system without the ability to manage access to PII,” they added. “As a result, I have submitted my resignation to GSA. Today will be my last day.”


404 Media previously obtained leaked audio from a meeting Shedd had with TTS employees in which he suggested that a tool called login.gov could be turned into an information sharing platform across government agencies that could be used to identify people doing fraud. He also suggested that many government employees could be replaced with “AI coding agents” that would be created by his team.

Notify.gov is a platform that allows government agencies to text people. Examples shown in a demo include, for example, telling someone that their Medicaid coverage is expiring and must be renewed alongside instructions to renew it.

The resignation note. Full text below
Sources at TTS told 404 Media that the fact Shedd wants access to Notify.gov is “scary news.”

“Someone at TTS resigned rather than surrender a vast trove of data to Thomas Shedd,” one employee said. “I’m scared that we’ll run out of people who will tell him no.”
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,092
Reputation
8,816
Daps
138,961
The employee told 404 Media that "Notify contains PII, including at least: names, phone numbers, and the status of participating in public benefit programs which are based on financial status."

Another employee also told 404 Media that the development was concerning, and that granting Shedd admin access to the system outside of established protocols would be dangerous for the resigning worker to do.

“The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 (FISMA) requires creating these policies for every information system,” the second employee told 404 Media. “They are a legal requirement. The policies spell out who can have access and under what circumstances. An authorizing official must accept the policy by formally signing it and personally accepting the risk.”

💡
Do you know anything else about TTS, GSA, or DOGE? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at +1 202 505 1702. Otherwise, send me an email at jason@404media.co.
FISMA says that to provide someone access to a system they must go through an Authorization to Operate (ATO) process that determines who should have access to what systems, and for what reasons. The resigning worker said in their Slack message that they had been “instructed to skip that process and place the system in non-compliance.”

The worker who resigned said in their resignation note that Shedd would have unfettered, private access to the information of anyone who has interacted with the Notify system.

Here is the full message:

“The TTS commissioner, Thomas Shedd, has required us to provide admin/root access to all components of the Notify.gov system. With this access:

• Thomas would be able to view all personally identifiable information (PIl) moving through the Notify system, including phone numbers and variable data for members of the public. This information exists in our UI, cloud.gov-managed resources, and AWS resources. Thomas would be able to download and store this data without anybody else receiving a notification.

• Thomas would be able to fully manage the access of others, including granting the same access to others or removing it from existing team members. Granting the same access would, of course, grant the same ability to view and download PII.

We have not received a justification for this request, which makes it difficult to suggest alternative approaches that would accomplish Thomas's goals while still being protective of PlI for members of the public. We have made clear to Thomas that this level of permission would allow access to PII. While we have suggested alternatives, such as read-only access, Thomas has continued to request full admin/root access.

We also believe that this level of access for somebody outside of the product team is not contemplated by the system's authority to operate. While it's entirely possible to properly update the SSPP [System Security and Privacy Plan] to add this sort of access using our established ATO [Authorization to Operate] processes, we have been instructed to skip that process and place the system in non-compliance until the access is remediated.

I don't believe that I can operate a program and system without the ability to manage access to PII. As a result, I have submitted my resignation to GSA. Today will be my last day.

It has truly been a pleasure to work with each and every one of you. I have valued your individual and collective contributions toward building a new-to-government shared system that has already had an impact. I have valued your care, commitment, and diligence. We have built a program together on a stable foundation, which can allow it to survive even beyond our time on this team. I am proud of that, and l am proud of you.”
The GSA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
 

Paper Boi

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
74,511
Reputation
25,627
Daps
485,532
Reppin
NULL

Reuters News Group is definitely owned by Thomson Reuters unless it was sold in recent years


but yeah Thomson Reuters is a huge conglomerate that does all kinds of shyt with information, both public and private. there would be no reason to hire a news group to do a study for the DOD. :mjlol:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
60,168
Reputation
9,006
Daps
166,267


















1/41
@electricfutures
After several delays, @DOGE has finally posted its purported savings. Why did it take so long to create a simple webpage with a 1000-row table? Who knows! Let's dig in.

Headline number: $55B saved. They list the savings per nixed contract. This should be easy to verify then.

🧵

[Quoted tweet]
It's Monday. @DOGE is the laziest, most overpaid bunch of incompetent, unelected bureaucrats we've ever seen.


2/41
@electricfutures
The first thing I did is add up the "saved" column for all canceled contracts and real estate. The numbers are $16.5B and $0.14B, respectively. Odd...

Since almost all of the purported savings come from contracts, we'll focus on that.

2/



3/41
@electricfutures
The single biggest ticket item is a DHS contract listed as saving $8 billion. Wow, that's a huge contract!

Actually no, it's $8 million. They must have tried to automate scraping the FPDS form and failed.

That means we're down to $8.5B in savings.

3/



GkFYjslXoAApyAz.png


4/41
@electricfutures
The next 3 biggest ticket items are all USAID contracts listed as $655M each, so $2B total. Wow, pretty big.

Wait, these are IDVs, not contracts. $655M is the entire set-aside, being triple counted. In the first 5 years, only $73M was awarded, and only 2 years remain.

4/



GkFaHCCXkAAKO2O.jpg

GkFaRj1XIAAwOay.jpg

GkFbKAVXoAAopA_.jpg


5/41
@electricfutures
So we're down to $6.5B in savings, and an alarming trend emerges: @DOGE does not seem to understand how the government contracts they are canceling work. The savings they are claiming are not annual savings, but rather hypothetical savings if we spent every unobligated penny.

5/



6/41
@electricfutures
And more importantly, they are just getting it *wrong*, with alarming consistency. These numbers are erroneous. This "select group of geniuses" has not double checked even the LARGEST items accounting for the bulk of their claimed savings. This is a sad, pathetic farce

@elonmusk



7/41
@electricfutures
Here's the next biggest item: an IT services contract for the Social Security Administration worth $1B. That's a lot of savings!

Well, again, this contract spanned 6 years. 80% has already been spent. Ah well, more like $240M in savings spread over the next 3 years. $80M/year.



GkFj_y0WkAABfab.jpg


8/41
@electricfutures
In 2023, this contract funded 1000 FTEs working $100/hr. Did we need 1000 SWEs working on SSA infrastructure? Probably not - these could be valid savings (disclaimer: no idea what they actually did). But worth noting that these cuts will impact many private sector jobs as well.



GkFlZnOWcAAXFdJ.jpg


9/41
@electricfutures
And if anyone is curious, there are currently 17 lines that say "SEE FPDS" rather than the savings amount, I guess because their automated scraping failed. I did it manually and it took roughly ~10 minutes. But that's too much to ask of super geniuses working 120 hours/week!



10/41
@DearLeftyFriend
Missing context:



GkGLUEZXkAAxT8D.jpg


11/41
@electricfutures
Congratulations, you scrolled infinitely far back in my replies and found an instance of me using logic to help someone understand the difference between communism and Democratic socialism



12/41
@tarakeshwar
You paid X to boost this tweet right 🤦🏿‍♀️



13/41
@electricfutures
Nope. @fukkyouiquit retweeted it and it went viral. I will never pay this site a fukking penny.



14/41
@pamdebear632
If you are so good at this, why did YOU not look into trying to root out waste in the govt? Is DOGE to be condemned bc during their attempt to find waste, they discovered fraud? We gotta start somewhere clawing back.



15/41
@electricfutures
If they paid me $14M they paid DOGE I guarantee you I would do an infinitely better job.



16/41
@LanceBybee
The gov can’t just cancel a contract without being liable for costs and expenses incurred prior to the cancellation. Most cancellations end up having costs and money spent on the contract, but if it was cancelled, then the government gets nothing return for that expenditure



17/41
@electricfutures
Yep, here is an example of that: https://nitter.poast.org/electricfutures/status/1891904556767781163

They are not accounting for these honestly at all. It's pretty clear their instructions were something like "pick the biggest number no matter what"

[Quoted tweet]
Here's the next biggest item: an IT services contract for the Social Security Administration worth $1B. That's a lot of savings!

Well, again, this contract spanned 6 years. 80% has already been spent. Ah well, more like $240M in savings spread over the next 3 years. $80M/year.


GkFj_y0WkAABfab.jpg


18/41
@RandTaylor2
Does Elon get a “finders fee”?



19/41
@electricfutures
He doesn't need to be paid because he gets to leverage the position to spread propaganda about & kneecap the agencies regulating his businesses. He's shown repeatedly he has no regard for the truth.



20/41
@SJonNantucket
I doubt your math is correct but also wondering what kind of person is rooting for waste and fraud



21/41
@electricfutures
I'm rooting for the truth.

There isn't much math here. These are very basic accounting errors (or intentional distortions to make the number seem bigger than it really is). I've yet to see any evidence of fraud.



22/41
@GamemasterYado
Elon consistently puts the L in Elon



23/41
@Nljigakulive
If DOGE really wanted to stop wasteful spending they’d go after the DOD/pentagon who have failed their last 7 audits.



24/41
@AstorAaron
This is good stuff. I think we should just call their work "DOGEshytE".



25/41
@barbarikon
They can do this because their target audience can’t read, nor understand numbers.



26/41
@JWSPEED2
Dismantle the whole Federal government and then @DOGE . That'll help.



27/41
@Shaelaran
“Please leave our unelected bureaucrats’ power to spend our taxpayer money alone.” That’s a no homie. I don’t care what breaks. We will see what happens in a year or two



28/41
@Marcusgibson
Why is Elon low-key reposting that bogus DOGE clock based on target not actual ~$55bn?



GkGZ0vZasAAq3Fs.jpg


29/41
@BeasterXP
They have saved 2.75% of their goal in 1 month. This puts them on pace to save 2 Trillion in 36 months. The problem? They are hitting the easiest areas first. It’s going to get harder and harder to find savings. They should be over 30% of their goal to keep a realistic



30/41
@iiliyaa
We all know now why no one wants to claim they’re in charge of DOGE. When things go well, everyone will definitely show up credit, but when it falls apart, suddenly no one will be responsible. Disaster is an orphan!



31/41
@JKLund_Official
Good thread.

I also noticed that the numbers done make sense. How does one get 37.5 billion in savings from 75,000 buyouts?

$500k per govt employee?????



32/41
@br3jjc
Keep chasing…



33/41
@PhotoJouMATT
Did they just cancel the Departmental of Veterans affairs subscription to Dynamed?



34/41
@ajquery
they also have many instances like this

[Quoted tweet]
How can you have savings of $355,931 on a $79,486 contract? claimed total savings of $355,931, for a contract to MID-ATLANTIC SERVICES GROUP, INC. However, the source they provide claims $0 in savings, a contract value of $79,486, and a recipient of FEDERAL MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC.


GkG0PJFaAAEgkZ8.jpg


35/41
@jfeldis
I have been seeing daily savings updates from DOGE on X for the last few weeks



36/41
@NotPhilSledge
How do we know that the $55B figure is accurate, and what measures are in place to verify the savings claimed for each contract?



37/41
@Guruleaks1
unroll @threadreaderapp



38/41
@devahaz
Foreshadowing:

[Quoted tweet]
This DOGE stuff is so unserious. The “no-brainer” $125B savings include $120B that are simply a goal of how much of its spending the govt wants to contract to “socially/economically disadvantaged” small business. Sure get rid of that if you want, but it saves zero dollars.


GhhZoksacAQCHJU.jpg

GhhZokuaoAA1lpz.jpg


39/41
@karenvaites
These issues are apparent in the Dept of Education cuts, too, per @jillbarshay’s reporting:

[Quoted tweet]
On DOGE cuts and the DOE:

“It seems unlikely that taxpayers will reap $881 million in savings from the cancellations.”

This is the key insight on DOGE’s cancellations to date. Not only is the claim about the size of the savings overstated, much of that work is apparently going to be re-bid, so “savings” claimed now will vaporize.

Frankly, the savings feels like a lot of smoke and mirrors.

In addition, there is still a fair amount of confusion about what projects are in that $881M in the first place. @jillbarshay gives examples, yet notes the sense of confusion.


GkFoDcYWUAEiKuW.jpg


40/41
@ChicagoPravda


[Quoted tweet]
DOGE has identified ~0.8% of the budget that can be cut. A decent, experienced financial analyst can find that in an afternoon. And would do so objectively instead of just cherry picking things for political reasons.

When does DOGE actually start doing something impressive?


GkG2Z9sXMAAulkk.jpg


41/41
@andremessina_
Elon go so rich he can no longer tell the difference between million and billion if it’s right there on the paper. 😂




To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
 
Top