JasonSJackson
Jah Sun Ma'at Ra
It seems the idea of monarchy is deemed primitive and unproductive to most people, religous ones specifically, but is accepted and praised when it comes to historical texts (the Bible specifically) why is this?
no, the monarchy itself wasnt praised............the rulers of those monarchs and what they did for their kingdoms are (King David, King Solomon....The past must be accepted...
and as for the praise, I dont think it was the monarchy itself being praised... I could be wrong though.
Every era has a different kind of governance
historically the most stable sovereignties have been empires/monarchies. we all praise democracy because of the voice it gives us, but again, historically all republics/democracies have been crushed by more traditional kings/empires. America is really the first massive nation to maintain democratic principles....at least on the surface. We'll see how long it lasts.It seems the idea of monarchy is deemed primitive and unproductive to most people, religous ones specifically, but is accepted and praised when it comes to historical texts (the Bible specifically) why is this?
Say it Wit Ya Chest said:It seems the idea of monarchy is deemed primitive and unproductive to most people, religous ones specifically, but is accepted and praised when it comes to historical texts (the Bible specifically) why is this?