GPBear
The Tape Crusader
Particularly Schoenberg and Stockhausen.
Pretty white thread, but I think it's good to expand horizons, and considering there's a thread called "Ever made a beat while watching PORN" I think so heady, high-minded bullshyt will even it out...
Anyways, if you make a write a song, a beat, whatever, usually there's a "root" note, and using a traditional progression, a couple more notes build off of the root. For example, you play a song on the guitar and it goes 'C-F-G'. The root note and progression you use determine which key you're playing in.
But what if you used every note in the scale equally. Then there is no key, it's atonal.
And that was Schoenberg's idea (he called it pantonal).
Stockhausen was influential in being one of the first composers to use electronics in his music accessed from scientific innovations made for WWII radio frequencies/radar. Things that we use today like modulators or what have you.
Pretty white thread, but I think it's good to expand horizons, and considering there's a thread called "Ever made a beat while watching PORN" I think so heady, high-minded bullshyt will even it out...
Anyways, if you make a write a song, a beat, whatever, usually there's a "root" note, and using a traditional progression, a couple more notes build off of the root. For example, you play a song on the guitar and it goes 'C-F-G'. The root note and progression you use determine which key you're playing in.
But what if you used every note in the scale equally. Then there is no key, it's atonal.
And that was Schoenberg's idea (he called it pantonal).
Stockhausen was influential in being one of the first composers to use electronics in his music accessed from scientific innovations made for WWII radio frequencies/radar. Things that we use today like modulators or what have you.