porque
Boricua Guerrero
The Fast and the Ridiculous - By James Verini | Foreign Policy
They say Fast and Furious proves the agency has been funneling guns to Mexican criminal organizations. Why the ATF would be doing this -- and making official policy of it -- is never part of the argument. Nonetheless, it's a short leap from that rock over the stream of reason and onto the one where Obama is actively working with Mexican cartels. While that sounds preposterous to most of us, there is a place where the levelheaded believe what the anti-government fringe in the United States believes, and where Fast and Furious is a constant topic of conversation -- Mexico.
...Project Gunrunner and later Fast and Furious were, (journalist)Bojórquez is sure, a way for America to arm Chapo, with whom it's in business. To him, this connection is as clear as day.
More recently, the New York Times detailed the DEA's program for laundering and moving money for Mexican traffickers in order to trace where it goes (like Fast and Furious, but with bills, not guns). In a case going on in Chicago, El Mayo's son, Jesús Zambada Niebla, who was extradited to the United States in 2010, has claimed that he is immune to prosecution because he was working with the DEA.
Revelations like these, combined with the failure of the Mexican government to capture Chapo and El Mayo, lead people like Bojórquez to the same conclusion: The Sinaloa cartel cut a deal with Calderón when he came into office, whereby it would help Mexico City go after other cartels, such as the Zetas, in exchange for some amount of immunity. Calderón could only have done this, the argument goes, with high-level approval from Washington -- and Fast and Furious, a way to help Chapo, is evidence of that devil's bargain.
They say Fast and Furious proves the agency has been funneling guns to Mexican criminal organizations. Why the ATF would be doing this -- and making official policy of it -- is never part of the argument. Nonetheless, it's a short leap from that rock over the stream of reason and onto the one where Obama is actively working with Mexican cartels. While that sounds preposterous to most of us, there is a place where the levelheaded believe what the anti-government fringe in the United States believes, and where Fast and Furious is a constant topic of conversation -- Mexico.
...Project Gunrunner and later Fast and Furious were, (journalist)Bojórquez is sure, a way for America to arm Chapo, with whom it's in business. To him, this connection is as clear as day.
More recently, the New York Times detailed the DEA's program for laundering and moving money for Mexican traffickers in order to trace where it goes (like Fast and Furious, but with bills, not guns). In a case going on in Chicago, El Mayo's son, Jesús Zambada Niebla, who was extradited to the United States in 2010, has claimed that he is immune to prosecution because he was working with the DEA.
Revelations like these, combined with the failure of the Mexican government to capture Chapo and El Mayo, lead people like Bojórquez to the same conclusion: The Sinaloa cartel cut a deal with Calderón when he came into office, whereby it would help Mexico City go after other cartels, such as the Zetas, in exchange for some amount of immunity. Calderón could only have done this, the argument goes, with high-level approval from Washington -- and Fast and Furious, a way to help Chapo, is evidence of that devil's bargain.
Bushes, Clinton, and now Obeezy all been dope dealers. Get money, nikka. All they have to do is make it legal, and tomorrow, DEA, ATF, and 50% of the rest of the alphabet boys are out of business, and prison pop drops 25%. It'll never happen with the current political system in place, they're just makin' too much money. Gotta love how that one story about the CIA plane loaded with like $2M in cocaine got swept under rug 
You send 10,000 troops to Mehico right now, and this guerra de drogas is finito. You mean they can take out Noriega, who was a f*ckin' henerall, and they can't take out some two bit mustache wearin dealers? 
