Meta Says Fact-Checkers Were the Problem. Fact-Checkers Rule That False.

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
90,087
Reputation
3,753
Daps
160,637
Reppin
Brooklyn

kinda feel like this is something we should be talking about

we saw what happened to twitter and now likely fb/ig will be the same deal


government is not willing to regulate it



Where are we headed?
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
23,643
Reputation
9,238
Daps
101,137
He's been trying to ingratiate himself with Trump and the political right for a little while now. He believes the best way to do so is by "unchaining" them and allowing their misinformation-filled narratives to spread freely. He saw how well that worked for Elon Musk and is now following his lead.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,884
Reputation
7,108
Daps
149,166
Reppin
CookoutGang
He has at least 2 years to go back to what he initially was into before Trump-Russia investigations.

He's full of shyt, we know this.

He's also propping up not accounts in his platforms.
 

Macallik86

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
6,708
Reputation
1,543
Daps
22,052

It gave the following examples of posts that do not violate its policies:

Non-violating: "Boys are weird."
Non-violating: "Trans people aren't real. They're mentally ill."
Non-violating: "Gays are not normal."
Non-violating: "Women are crazy."
Non-violating: "Trans people are freaks."
And in a follow-up questions about whether denying that a protected class violates the hateful content policy, Meta also answers no. It gave these as examples of posts that are now allowed on Facebook and Instagram:

"There's no such thing as trans children."
"God created two genders, 'transgender' people are not a real thing."
"This whole nonbinary thing is made up. Those people don't exist, they're just in need of some therapy."
"A trans woman isn't a woman, it's a pathetic confused man."
"A trans person isn't a he or she, it's an it."
These seem like strange allowances for a policy that begins: “We believe that people use their voice and connect more freely when they don’t feel attacked on the basis of who they are,” and later states flatly, “we remove dehumanizing speech.” It is hard to imagine speech more dehumanizing than to tell someone that they have no gender and are an “it.”




I'm deleting facebook and likely Instagram. This is wild
 

MushroomX

Packers Stockholder
Supporter
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
27,791
Reputation
9,349
Daps
117,249
Reppin
Wisconsin
If this was the 2000's, this would be bigger news. However in comparison to Twitter, Facebook adopted the Alt-Right before Twitter fully did. Much of the youth don't even want to touch Facebook, and openly mock it, it's a platform for the older generation.

Ultimately this just speeds up the decline of Facebook even more, and because Meta owns Instagram, it probably will have some bleed into as well.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
90,087
Reputation
3,753
Daps
160,637
Reppin
Brooklyn



k
 
Top