This video proves it.
Defend math if you can after watching this.
(2 - 1) . (1 + 2 + 4 + 8...) = (2 - 1) + (4 - 2) + (8 - 4) + (16 - 8)...
(2 - 1) . (1 + 2 + 4 + 8...) = ( - 1) + (2 - 2) + (4 - 4) + (8 - 8)...
I think it's the video that's flawed.
The way he showed it is biased because he aligned "-1" under "nothing" and "2" under "-2" and so on to prove his point but he should have aligned "-1" under "2" and so on and that would have been the right way.
I mean, he sould have done it that way :
And what he did was :Code:(2 - 1) . (1 + 2 + 4 + 8...) = (2 - 1) + (4 - 2) + (8 - 4) + (16 - 8)...
Code:(2 - 1) . (1 + 2 + 4 + 8...) = ( - 1) + (2 - 2) + (4 - 4) + (8 - 8)...
EDIT : I am no math head and I know it talks about infinity but I meant was that he did the "distribution" wrongly
EDIT : at the gradient on the code tags
reminds me of 0.999... = 1
wat u don't believe me ?
check this:
let's have y = 0.999...
10y = 0.999... x 10 = 9.999... right ?
so 10y - y = 9.999... - 0.999... = 9 right ?
which means 9y = 9 hence y = 1
oh word ? link me to itThat was my first math is flawed thread. That thread did pretty well but I feel this one is going to die soon.
oh word ? link me to it
This video does not prove math is flawed but since I can't alter the thread topic, just watch this interesting but flawed video.
the fallacy appears when he says "things on the right cancel each other out" infinity - infinity = ....unknown/undetermined
he has no way of making that subtraction because he wouldn't know where to stop