That's fair. I remember Havoc saying that. I think in Scratch Magazine he said once he started getting royalty checks, he started seeing the importance of trying to make sure that sampled artists got their cut.I get where he's coming from, having limited resources and wanting the dopest sounds but if you use someone else's work without asking, you should be ready for the consequences
I don't care either way, when I sample something I don't own it's not like I made the original sample, but I don't go around just saying I sampled x y z either. If you find it you find it, and if you ask me, I don't mind telling the person directly, the problem is when you can't get stuff cleared and lawyers want to say owe' lets get him. I can understand not disclosing in that instance. People should do what they feel like doing. You ask the older generation they will be against it, if you ask the newer generation they can probably care less.Thoughts @bigrodthe1 @producingfire and others
That shyt happened to me a few times last year when producer friends sent me some samples they found. I heard a few things that I made me realize a lot less was done with the sample than what I thought.I can see both sides of the argument. Finding out what the sample is for a beat sometimes takes away its aura a bit though