'Made in China' Now Being Made in Africa

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,707
Reputation
555
Daps
22,613
Reppin
Arrakis
'Made in China' Now Being Made in Africa
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/23/made-in-china-now-being-made-in-africa.html

Sun Qiaoming is a trader from Jiangsu. He operates his import-export business on the Eastern coast of China, where there is plenty of space for a man with his drive and skills to prosper. Already fairly successful, he recently set his sights beyond his country’s borders. “There’s been much talk about the Chinese Dream in the past few years, but I have an African Dream.” he said. “African gold will fill my next bucket of gold.”
He wasn’t referring to the natural resources that President Obama recently hinted as the reason for China’s presence on the African continent. After all, Sun is a private entrepreneur, and receives no direct support from the government in his business endeavors. His “gold” is the labor in Africa—cheap, trainable, abundant, and ready to work. They may not have the decades of know-how that the Chinese developed during their meteoric rise in global production, but Sun is confident that with time and proper training, they will be able to match the efficiency and productivity of workers in China.

With rising labor and energy costs, as well as tightening environmental restrictions, it is becoming increasing difficult for Chinese industrialists to churn out cheap goods at a massive scale in their own country. Even as fresh university graduates suffer a high unemployment rate, few want to take jobs on factory floors. “The post-90s generation wants office jobs, not blue collar work,” Sun explains. “It’s understandable. Life is much easier now. Factory work is stable but I want my children to have other options.”

The result is an exodus of Chinese manufacturing to places where labor is cheaper and financial incentives like capital subsidies are offered to foreign-owned factories.

But vibrant industry requires solid infrastructure, which is where the Chinese government enters the equation. Last year, over 214,000 workers were posted in Africa to build highways, bridges, dams, and power plants. That’s about a quarter of all Chinese workers who are sent abroad to work for state-owned enterprises.

“As much as I want to work there,” says a Chinese entrepreneur, “I can’t look for a wife—marrying an African is marrying down—so I will need to do that here.”
For decades, the Chinese government has had a foothold on the African continent. During the Mao era, the Chinese government funded and executed massive infrastructure projects like a railway connecting Tanzania and Zambia, reaping benefits on multiple levels. Not only does China have access to the wealth of natural resources in a multitude of African countries, the support from those nations was necessary for the People’s Republic of China to gain membership to the United Nations, opening up a plethora of opportunities in international diplomacy and trade.

Chinese support in Africa has been on a steady rise in the past 25 years. Trade between China and Africa rose by 700 percent in the 1990s. China’s foreign direct investment in Africa has increased by over 50 percent per year since 2001. Aside from the highly visible presence of state-owned enterprises that take on massive projects, privateers like Sun Qiaoming have been carving out their own commercial fiefdoms as well.

In the early 2000s, an acquaintance told Sun about the possibility of doing business in Ethiopia. At the time, Ethiopians still relied on imports from Western Europe for many commodities, most of which were costlier than goods produced in China. As a test, Sun shipped over a container stuffed with apparel made in his home province. After it reached Ethiopia, the contents were distributed and sold out in under two weeks. That marked the beginning of a fruitful long-term relationship with his Ethiopian clients. By utilizing those existing connections, and partnering with another entrepreneur from his hometown, he is in the final stages of planning for a new textile factory near Addis Ababa, joining other Chinese industrialists who have made the move.

Even though Sun and his partner plan on using materials and equipment imported from China, all of his factory staff will be Ethiopian. “It’s about adding value locally,” he explained. “Once we hit the 20 or 30 percent mark, our clothes will officially be ‘Made in Ethiopia.’ Then it will be easier for us to sell to the US and EU.” The west puts limits on commodity imports from China. Production relocation to Africa and South America have allowed Chinese enterprises to circumvent trade caps.

Sun is one of a small segment of Chinese businessmen willing to take the risk to establish new businesses in far-off lands, but prejudice is still an issue. “My family thinks all of Africa is the same. Just because Libya was evacuated and West Africa is dealing with Ebola, it doesn’t mean business is affected everywhere else,” he said. “But then, as much as I want to work there, I can’t look for a wife—marrying an African is marrying down—so I will need to do that here.”

It took a long time for the US government to realize that it is falling behind China when it came to economic engagement with Africa, whether between governments or private enterprises. Eager to catch up, President Obama hosted the recent US-Africa Leadership Summit, but positive attention on cooperation and renewed ties was overshadowed by statements suggesting that China was the elephant in the room.

Last week, during an interview with NPR’s Morning Edition, National Security Advisor Susan Rice attempted to point out the differences in how Americans and Chinese do business in Africa, suggesting that Chinese (state-owned) businesses bring in their own workers for projects in Africa, while American enterprises give those opportunities to locals and builds their capacities to maintain the infrastructure once construction is complete. However, Howard French, author of China’s Second Continent, contested those words and pointed out that American engagement on the ground in Africa is nearly absent, bringing up examples of American construction projects in Africa that were outsourced to a Chinese firm.

As the spin continues, it seems like the scales are tipped in China’s favor. The nation’s investment in Africa polishes its soft power image, and the improved infrastructure benefit the African nations and the many Chinese businessmen they host. Sun is confident about his new venture, and genuine enthusiasm and excitement are packed into his words when he speaks of his upcoming journey. “I love spicy food, and my friends tell me that Sichuan hotpot has become very popular in Addis Abeba,” he said. Even with new beginnings, he won’t be missing some of the comforts of home.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,544
Reputation
13,880
Daps
299,384
Reppin
Toronto
Sounds awful

Basically they wanna exploit cheap labour and lax environmental regulations in other words ruin a whole new environment. No thanks. I hope Africans are smarter than this. Our land is worth more than cheap plastic bulk bullshyt for wholesale.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,373
Sounds awful

Basically they wanna exploit cheap labour and lax environmental regulations in other words ruin a whole new environment. No thanks. I hope Africans are smarter than this. Our land is worth more than cheap plastic bulk bullshyt for wholesale.


I have to disagree. Manufacturing is exactly what Africa needs, infrastructure and will pull a significant amount of poverty into a middle class.
 

Trajan

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
18,759
Reputation
5,250
Daps
81,899
Reppin
Frankincense and Myrrh
I have to disagree. Manufacturing is exactly what Africa needs, infrastructure and will pull a significant amount of poverty into a middle class.

Yep. Africans can't be selling raw materials forever. Manufacturing is the next step.

Also, industrialising is never pretty. You'll get pollution...overcrowding in boom towns...and a lot of exploitative relationships. But the future will be rosier thereafter.

The Brits went through it...China went through it and hopefully Africa will too.

Hopefully they minimise the negative impact.
 

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,740
Daps
2,324
Seeing how nice Nigeria is because of china, I can't see how this will be a bad thing.

I see a good future for Africa if they make the right decisions. I hope they don't allow African Americans to immigrant there-- that would be a very bad decision.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,544
Reputation
13,880
Daps
299,384
Reppin
Toronto
I have to disagree. Manufacturing is exactly what Africa needs, infrastructure and will pull a significant amount of poverty into a middle class.
Yes but not foreign run companies that doesn't change anything... Read clearly china's push to the top has had dire consequences on the environment there and they are now forcibly enforcing regulations.

There is already a manufacturing push happening locally in some African countries. We should also be careful not to repeat their mistakes. It wouldn't do any good to industrialise Africa at the cost of the environment.
 

wheywhey

Pro
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
1,412
Reputation
520
Daps
2,026
Last week, during an interview with NPR’s Morning Edition, National Security Advisor Susan Rice attempted to point out the differences in how Americans and Chinese do business in Africa, suggesting that Chinese (state-owned) businesses bring in their own workers for projects in Africa, while American enterprises give those opportunities to locals and builds their capacities to maintain the infrastructure once construction is complete. However, Howard French, author of China’s Second Continent, contested those words and pointed out that American engagement on the ground in Africa is nearly absent, bringing up examples of American construction projects in Africa that were outsourced to a Chinese firm.

Interesting how government officials will just make up anything. Granted there might be a Pepsi plant or two in Africa but I am not aware of any wide scale American commercial interests in Africa.
 

TTT

All Star
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
2,249
Reputation
460
Daps
5,556
Reppin
NULL
I read an article on Bloomberg about some Chinese investor in footwear operating out of Ethiopia and paid something like 40 bucks a month and he was complaining about the road infrastructure. The strategy China is taking is something they foreshadowed as their labor costs would never remain cheap forever or at least to the point that it starts eating up their margins. The Chinese strategy is not entirely new, it is an extension of the East Asian development process or model that they termed the Flying Geese theory.One country develops and as a result of its development it can pull the others. The order of development is based on the developed country usually moving up the technology ladder and outsourcing work that involves a lot of dirty or less developed technical processes to the less developed country while it concentrates moving up the ladder. The country that has all those outsourced industry can put in a lot of surplus labor or convert them from farming into this wage earning economy and they learn technologies, master them , copy them and develop their own. Japan did this for the Asian continent and even the resources for infrastructure deal China likes were used by China to get Japan to build them trade related infrastructure. Hyundai started out borrowing engines and licensed designs from Mitsubishi until it managed to start building cars of its own. China has positioned itself well to be the partner for development that Japan was for East and Southeast Asia.
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,536
I read an article on Bloomberg about some Chinese investor in footwear operating out of Ethiopia and paid something like 40 bucks a month and he was complaining about the road infrastructure. The strategy China is taking is something they foreshadowed as their labor costs would never remain cheap forever or at least to the point that it starts eating up their margins. The Chinese strategy is not entirely new, it is an extension of the East Asian development process or model that they termed the Flying Geese theory.One country develops and as a result of its development it can pull the others. The order of development is based on the developed country usually moving up the technology ladder and outsourcing work that involves a lot of dirty or less developed technical processes to the less developed country while it concentrates moving up the ladder. The country that has all those outsourced industry can put in a lot of surplus labor or convert them from farming into this wage earning economy and they learn technologies, master them , copy them and develop their own. Japan did this for the Asian continent and even the resources for infrastructure deal China likes were used by China to get Japan to build them trade related infrastructure. Hyundai started out borrowing engines and licensed designs from Mitsubishi until it managed to start building cars of its own. China has positioned itself well to be the partner for development that Japan was for East and Southeast Asia.

tumblr_laf8hhYEuV1qbxlumo1_500.gif


My nikkaz are coming of age, sh*t brings tears to my eyes :to: Such succint poignant apropos posting. :obama:
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,544
Reputation
13,880
Daps
299,384
Reppin
Toronto
Yep. Africans can't be selling raw materials forever. Manufacturing is the next step.

Also, industrialising is never pretty. You'll get pollution...overcrowding in boom towns...and a lot of exploitative relationships. But the future will be rosier thereafter.

The Brits went through it...China went through it and hopefully Africa will too.

Hopefully they minimise the negative impact.
TrueType
I read an article on Bloomberg about some Chinese investor in footwear operating out of Ethiopia and paid something like 40 bucks a month and he was complaining about the road infrastructure. The strategy China is taking is something they foreshadowed as their labor costs would never remain cheap forever or at least to the point that it starts eating up their margins. The Chinese strategy is not entirely new, it is an extension of the East Asian development process or model that they termed the Flying Geese theory.One country develops and as a result of its development it can pull the others. The order of development is based on the developed country usually moving up the technology ladder and outsourcing work that involves a lot of dirty or less developed technical processes to the less developed country while it concentrates moving up the ladder. The country that has all those outsourced industry can put in a lot of surplus labor or convert them from farming into this wage earning economy and they learn technologies, master them , copy them and develop their own. Japan did this for the Asian continent and even the resources for infrastructure deal China likes were used by China to get Japan to build them trade related infrastructure. Hyundai started out borrowing engines and licensed designs from Mitsubishi until it managed to start building cars of its own. China has positioned itself well to be the partner for development that Japan was for East and Southeast Asia.

There are Ethiopian footwear company that are locally owned and very environmental conscious doing well enough to get their business models studies abroad. The Chinese are latching on to a wave that was already on a roll in ethiopia. Companies like solerebel and olibertes make premium fair trade goods from Ethiopias finest leather.
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
63,257
Reputation
18,298
Daps
234,990
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
This is why there's so much argument for neo pan africanism. As much as China is doing there's still huge room left for foreign investment and that should rightly come from the people of the diaspora.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,373
China Understands What The West Doesn't: Africa Is Our Next Superpower

Not that “Africa” is a country, of course, but it helps to look at broad, continent-wide trends. People are reluctant to the idea of demographics as the great driver of history. In the general case, this might be true. But the 21st century will see an unprecedented situation: one where every continent will face large-scale aging and slowing demographic growth. Every continent, that is, except one: Africa (or, to be more specific, sub-Saharan Africa). Africa is young whereas the rest of the world is graying, and any strategic thinking about the 21st century must take this into account.

Add to this Africa’s steadily improving situation with regard to governance (there are still many problems, but steadily less war, steadily more free elections, and so on), and a technological landscape and future that will allow Africa to leapfrog many aspects of the rich life that the rich world takes for granted. And national resources are just icing on the cake.

As is frequently remarked upon, and as a book review in this week’s Economist touches upon, China has a very deliberate and ambitious strategy of investment in Africa. The old categories of “neocolonialism” miss the point. So does the remark that China is only interested in Africa’s natural resources in order to fuel its own manufacturing-driven growth and put its strategic eggs in more than one basket.

For sure, China’s drive into Africa is mainly motivated by natural resources. But this is merely the catalyst of a broader phenomenon, which is really driven by the frustration of so many Chinese with the unbearably stifling and corrupt Chinese system. From a slow-growth West myopically hypnotized by China’s largely meaningless growth figures (and a bizarre envy of authoritarianism), we don’t actually see China for what it is, which is a very unhealthy society. The limitation on births. The ruthless and ineffective education system, which now no longer provides the jobs it promised. The omnipresent corruption and inflation. The stifling (literally) pollution. No wonder everyone who can is running for the exits.


For Chinese who cannot find advancement or fulfillment in a tottering system, Africa is actually enticing. Chinese are more at home than Westerners in cultures where clientelism (understood non-judgementally as a system where networks of interpersonal reciprocal relations are very important) is more important than legalism, and in Africa they can find a world where opportunities are more available for the taking for the driven and hard-working who are shut-out of the best networks in China. And, of course, we cannot discount the fact that most of the Chinese doing business in Africa are men coming from a country with an increasing shortage of women to a continent where there is not.

It is this social phenomenon which is driving China’s scramble for Africa, more than “neo-colonialism” or a mere geopolitical grab for oil and soybean fields. And underlying it is an understanding that the West ignores at its future peril: Africa is where the future is.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/pascale...he-west-doesnt-africa-is-our-next-superpower/
 

WIA20XX

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
6,584
Reputation
3,123
Daps
20,852
10 years later, China is a good option for young Chinese who can't make it in their own economy

 
Top