Madagascar and slavery in the black Atlantic (Data Dump)

videogamestashbox.com

Hotep
Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2015
Messages
7,459
Reputation
3,510
Daps
22,353
Reppin
When I win I bring we with me
screen-shot-2016-07-25-at-12-06-46.png


Screen-Shot-2015-12-14-at-4.13.07-PM-1024x732.png
Announcing the Mapping Memories of Madagascar digital project · Digital Scholarship Services · Lafayette College




:jbhmm:
Every now and again I would see a DNA result comeback as Madagascar, which isn't particularly odd given I've read enough / seen enough data that shows African Americans also have populations that came from there. That said I randomly got the urge to really look into that vector of populating the U.S. ...figured I'd dump some preliminary data I found.
:yeshrug:




Dr. Wendy Wilson-Fall of Lafayette University
WWF_Feature.gif
Memories of Madagascar and Slavery in the Black Atlantic
By Wendy Wilson-Fall
Foreword by Michael Gomez

ChesapeakeBay-map.gif
Let’s just back up and talk history for a minute. What do we really know about the coming of Malagasy people to the United States, both during the slave period and afterward? And what do we know about numbers and time periods?

OK. I’m going to talk about four or five different periods, although in my particular research, I’ve really focused on three of those periods. But I would say that the first period was the 17th century where you have records of Malagasies being brought in as slaves, both to Canada and to New York under the Dutch. And at that time it was the Philips family who were extremely active in bringing slaves from eastern Madagascar to New York, presumably to sell them in the northeast area, perhaps to Canada, perhaps down as far as Delaware. There’s certainly a record of that, although I haven’t seen any reckoning of the numbers of people. But then you get to the 18th century and you have to see this also as an evolution of the British attitude toward Americans having access to East Indian Ocean trade. So it’s a little bit like what caused the Boston Tea Party. Americans were not allowed to trade in the Indian Ocean. If they wanted something that was an Indian Ocean product they had to buy it in London or Bristol. They weren’t supposed to go directly, but because of their lobbying, there were two periods—I think between 1670 and 1693, and then 1712 to 1721 or so, when the British parliament actually legalized direct trade to the Indian Ocean. So, one of the results of that was several boats that left with the explicit intention of going to Madagascar to pick up labor and whose investors were mostly the big Virginia planters like Robert King Carter and John Randolph. John Baylor would be another. So they invested; they worked out the itinerary with their contemporaries, their financial advisors in London and Bristol, and the ships went directly to Île Sainte-Marie (Saint Mary’s Island) in the northeast of Madagascar. We have one record that between 1719 and 1721, 1400 people from Madagascar were imported into Tidewater, Virginia, which is actually a very big number for three years. It works out that almost about every 22nd or 25th captive would have been of Malagasy origin in that region.


carte_madagascar1-300x296.gif


If you look at the other research on Virginia, for example by Lorena Walsh, who’s a historian at Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, you realize that not only were they coming to Virginia, but of those 1400, fully a thousand of them went to one major river port, which was the York River. This suggests that there was a critical mass of people of Malagasy origin in a fairly delimited geographic area, who were owned and managed by a rather small and rarified group of people, which increases the likelihood that they would have met each other carrying out tasks for the various plantations they ended up on—perhaps seeing each other as messengers, as horse drivers, as boatmen. So those people were able to sustain at least some idea about having ancestors from Madagascar, and that Madagascar was a unique geographic place. It was not the same as the African continent.

The next group of people show up in the 1820s, and from the 1820s on, it’s kind of ironic. It’s the people coming in as slaves from 1719-1721 for whom we have a record of their arrival, because they were unfortunately classed as commodities. Even though we don’t have lists of their names, we know what ships they were on, we know who the captains were, and to a great extent, we even know who bought them. So we can say they were most likely at X, Y and Z plantations. That wasn’t true later.

The people who came in the 1820s to the 1830s belong to two different groups. One group I class as freed merchants. These were people who had white sponsors—you could say a trading partner or boss. They worked on their ships or they were sailors on their ships or perhaps they were linked to a particular commodity that these people were importing from the Indian Ocean. I have stories like that from South Carolina, from Alabama, from my own family in Maryland. And it appears that at least two of these families refer to Cape Town, South Africa, which makes sense because most Indian Ocean trade had to come through Cape Town. I have this category of people who appear to be free, at least by the time they came to the U.S. I do admit that it’s possible that some of them may have been what they call affranchi (manumitted) either in Mauritius or in Cape Town, so that’s always a possibility. In any case, they show up in the U.S. as free people.


The second group is people who appear to be brought in through an illegal, clandestine slave trade. And here’s the reason I think this. While I was collecting stories, I used the Internet, genealogical sites, and word of mouth, and I kept getting these stories where people only counted back to the 1830s. At first I thought, “No, this is impossible because the Atlantic slave trade was outlawed in 1808, and most of that was achieved by 1812, 1814, 1817. Could this be true? Maybe these people have confused the way they’re counting back their generations.” But when I got so many of these kinds of stories, I realized that I just had to be a little bit more flexible and allow the possibility that it was me who didn’t understand, that there’s something here that maybe hasn’t come to light before. And I was even able to identify geographic clusters of people in the United States, geographic clusters of stories of people who have ancestors who arrived as slaves after 1825. One difference with this group is that they don’t seem to have arrived in a great big boat full of people from Madagascar. They seem to have been isolated in areas where there aren’t other people from Madagascar, so they ended up sort of on their own in Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio. Those are all areas where these stories are coming from.

Afropop Worldwide | Wendy Wilson-Fall on Malagasy Americans






 

videogamestashbox.com

Hotep
Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2015
Messages
7,459
Reputation
3,510
Daps
22,353
Reppin
When I win I bring we with me
Not quite the same topic but interesting non the less...

JOHN LEWIS WALLER (1850-1907)
waller_john.jpg

Bruh was apparently the U.S. ambassador to Madagascar and got arrested by the french after successfully negotiating 15,000 acres of land for African Americans to settle on.
(I've not found anything that corroborates the land claim yet though)


Waller, convinced that overseas expansion by the U.S. would benefit American economy and black Americans, persuaded the island’s monarch to give him a concession of 15,000 acres that would be used for black American settlement after his term as consul ended in 1894. The French, however, viewed Waller’s activity as a threat to their colonial ambitions in Madagascar. Waller was subsequently accused by the French of providing sensitive military information to Madagascar’s indigenous people and was arrested. He was tried and convicted by a French colonial court and sentenced to prison in Marseille in 1894. He avoided the entire 20 years in prison only by the intervention of U.S. President Grover Cleveland, a Democrat, in 1895. The political storm surrounding the French arrest, trial and imprisonment of a former American diplomatic official came to be known as “the Waller Affair.”

Christensen, N. (2007, January 31) John Lewis Waller (1850-1907). Retrieved from John Lewis Waller (1850-1907) • BlackPast


His daughter married the Prince Henri Razafkeriefo, Nephew of the last sitting Queen Ranavalona iii

ranaval3.jpg

His daughter and the Prince had a child born in the U.S. who became a Jazz musician(among other things) ANDY RAZAF (1895–1973)
Andy_Razaf.png



Andy Razaf: The Life and Lyrics of the Prince of Madagascar

Riverwalk Jazz pays tribute to legendary songsmith Andy Razaf, who wrote lyrics to hundreds of popular songs of the 30s and 40s, including "Honeysuckle Rose" and "Ain’t Misbehavin'." A cavalcade of jazz greats join The Jim Cullum Jazz Band to perform songs from Razaf's' collaboration with celebrity piano man Fats Waller. Trumpeter Doc Cheatham, vibist Lionel Hampton and vocalist Joe Williams share the bill with pianist dikk Hyman and vocalists Vernel Bagneris and Nina Ferro.



Andy Razaf’s creativity was prodigious, his life story riveting, and his music unforgettable. Andreamentania Paul Razafkeriefo was born in 1895 in Washington DC. But his story begins in Africa. Andrea’s father Henri Razafkeriefo, a nobleman and warrior was the nephew of the Queen of Madagascar; he died in battle before Andrea was born. His grandfather John Louis Waller—no relation to Fats—was a political activist and former Missouri slave who became American consul to the African country of Madagascar in the early 1890s. Andrea took his royal African ancestors as role models.

........
.....
..

Riverwalk Jazz - Stanford University Libraries
Andy Razaf (1895–1973) • BlackPast



You can find notes of "The Waller Affair" within the foreign correspondence congressional record. Personally I've not dug that deep yet.

 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
20,361
Reputation
6,316
Daps
101,047
screen-shot-2016-07-25-at-12-06-46.png


Screen-Shot-2015-12-14-at-4.13.07-PM-1024x732.png
Announcing the Mapping Memories of Madagascar digital project · Digital Scholarship Services · Lafayette College




:jbhmm:
Every now and again I would see a DNA result comeback as Madagascar, which isn't particularly odd given I've read enough / seen enough data that shows African Americans also have populations that came from there. That said I randomly got the urge to really look into that vector of populating the U.S. ...figured I'd dump some preliminary data I found.
:yeshrug:




Dr. Wendy Wilson-Fall of Lafayette University
WWF_Feature.gif
Memories of Madagascar and Slavery in the Black Atlantic
By Wendy Wilson-Fall
Foreword by Michael Gomez

ChesapeakeBay-map.gif
Let’s just back up and talk history for a minute. What do we really know about the coming of Malagasy people to the United States, both during the slave period and afterward? And what do we know about numbers and time periods?

OK. I’m going to talk about four or five different periods, although in my particular research, I’ve really focused on three of those periods. But I would say that the first period was the 17th century where you have records of Malagasies being brought in as slaves, both to Canada and to New York under the Dutch. And at that time it was the Philips family who were extremely active in bringing slaves from eastern Madagascar to New York, presumably to sell them in the northeast area, perhaps to Canada, perhaps down as far as Delaware. There’s certainly a record of that, although I haven’t seen any reckoning of the numbers of people. But then you get to the 18th century and you have to see this also as an evolution of the British attitude toward Americans having access to East Indian Ocean trade. So it’s a little bit like what caused the Boston Tea Party. Americans were not allowed to trade in the Indian Ocean. If they wanted something that was an Indian Ocean product they had to buy it in London or Bristol. They weren’t supposed to go directly, but because of their lobbying, there were two periods—I think between 1670 and 1693, and then 1712 to 1721 or so, when the British parliament actually legalized direct trade to the Indian Ocean. So, one of the results of that was several boats that left with the explicit intention of going to Madagascar to pick up labor and whose investors were mostly the big Virginia planters like Robert King Carter and John Randolph. John Baylor would be another. So they invested; they worked out the itinerary with their contemporaries, their financial advisors in London and Bristol, and the ships went directly to Île Sainte-Marie (Saint Mary’s Island) in the northeast of Madagascar. We have one record that between 1719 and 1721, 1400 people from Madagascar were imported into Tidewater, Virginia, which is actually a very big number for three years. It works out that almost about every 22nd or 25th captive would have been of Malagasy origin in that region.


carte_madagascar1-300x296.gif


If you look at the other research on Virginia, for example by Lorena Walsh, who’s a historian at Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, you realize that not only were they coming to Virginia, but of those 1400, fully a thousand of them went to one major river port, which was the York River. This suggests that there was a critical mass of people of Malagasy origin in a fairly delimited geographic area, who were owned and managed by a rather small and rarified group of people, which increases the likelihood that they would have met each other carrying out tasks for the various plantations they ended up on—perhaps seeing each other as messengers, as horse drivers, as boatmen. So those people were able to sustain at least some idea about having ancestors from Madagascar, and that Madagascar was a unique geographic place. It was not the same as the African continent.

The next group of people show up in the 1820s, and from the 1820s on, it’s kind of ironic. It’s the people coming in as slaves from 1719-1721 for whom we have a record of their arrival, because they were unfortunately classed as commodities. Even though we don’t have lists of their names, we know what ships they were on, we know who the captains were, and to a great extent, we even know who bought them. So we can say they were most likely at X, Y and Z plantations. That wasn’t true later.

The people who came in the 1820s to the 1830s belong to two different groups. One group I class as freed merchants. These were people who had white sponsors—you could say a trading partner or boss. They worked on their ships or they were sailors on their ships or perhaps they were linked to a particular commodity that these people were importing from the Indian Ocean. I have stories like that from South Carolina, from Alabama, from my own family in Maryland. And it appears that at least two of these families refer to Cape Town, South Africa, which makes sense because most Indian Ocean trade had to come through Cape Town. I have this category of people who appear to be free, at least by the time they came to the U.S. I do admit that it’s possible that some of them may have been what they call affranchi (manumitted) either in Mauritius or in Cape Town, so that’s always a possibility. In any case, they show up in the U.S. as free people.


The second group is people who appear to be brought in through an illegal, clandestine slave trade. And here’s the reason I think this. While I was collecting stories, I used the Internet, genealogical sites, and word of mouth, and I kept getting these stories where people only counted back to the 1830s. At first I thought, “No, this is impossible because the Atlantic slave trade was outlawed in 1808, and most of that was achieved by 1812, 1814, 1817. Could this be true? Maybe these people have confused the way they’re counting back their generations.” But when I got so many of these kinds of stories, I realized that I just had to be a little bit more flexible and allow the possibility that it was me who didn’t understand, that there’s something here that maybe hasn’t come to light before. And I was even able to identify geographic clusters of people in the United States, geographic clusters of stories of people who have ancestors who arrived as slaves after 1825. One difference with this group is that they don’t seem to have arrived in a great big boat full of people from Madagascar. They seem to have been isolated in areas where there aren’t other people from Madagascar, so they ended up sort of on their own in Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio. Those are all areas where these stories are coming from.

Afropop Worldwide | Wendy Wilson-Fall on Malagasy Americans







I think on most DNA tests indicating Malagasy or Madagascar usually comes back as some combination of Southeast African/Bantu and Southeast Asian/Indonesian, because Indonesian women intermarried with the Bantu men on the Island. On Ancestry DNA they used to call those offspring Polynesian, which included Indonesia. Now I think they are just referred to as Philippine, which is what my mother's results show.

On 23andMe they don't call it anything. They just break it down to the Countries of origin. Here are my 23andme results:
    • Congolese 9.4%
    • Southern East African 0.3%
    • Broadly Congolese & Southern East African 2.7%
  • Broadly Chinese & Southeast Asian 0.3%
  • Indonesian, Thai, Khmer & Myanma 0.2%
  • Filipino & Austronesian 0.1%
  • Native American 0.1%
1200px-Indonesia_Madagascar_Locator.svg.png


https://www.smh.com.au/world/madaga...an-women-colonised-island-20120321-1vkbn.html
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,893
Reputation
9,531
Daps
81,348
they were imported to Virginia for rice growing methods

Proportion of Madagascar & Mozambique captives
This last chart is comparing the percentage of Madagascar captives with those from the slave port of Mozambique (not the country!). The presentday country of Mozambique was named after this island fortress but actually there were several more slave ports located in Mozambique and other parts of Southeast Africa. But Mozambique (the slave port) was firstmost in importance for almost all destinations in the Americas. For a complete overview see this chart. The striking thing about the chart below is that the USA clearly stands out as the only American destination where Madagascar captives were a majority among Southeast Africans.

tast-mada-vs-moza.jpg



Madagascar is increasingly being discovered as a potential place of origin by African Americans who have taken a DNA test (most recently for 2 guests on this Finding Your Roots episode). Malagasy ancestry might be surprisingly widely dispersed within the African American genepool even if strongly diluted, in almost all cases. This would be judging from personal observation and based on these indicators:

  • minor Southeast Asian percentages (usually inbetween 0,5%-2%) being reported for a multitude of African Americans tested on 23andme.
  • minor but still noticeable frequency of haplogroups associated with Malagasy ancestry among African Americans tested on 23andme.
  • frequent occurence of shared DNA segments between DNA tested Malagasy and African Americans.
Unlike most other destinations in the Americas it was Madagascar rather than Mozambique which provided most of the Southeast African captives to the USA. Also unlike most other destinations (safe for the Anglo Caribbean) these captives arrived mostly during an early timeperiod (1650-1750). For several reasons it seems they may have been in a favourable position to have relatively many descendants who due to the Domestic Slave trade also ended up in the Deep South aside from Virginia and the Northern states where they were initially concentrated.

The very fortunate circumstance about tracing any possible Madagascar ancestry is that it can be confirmed much more easily by way of the unique Southeast Asian component in Malagasy genetics and the inheritance of these markers among their descendants in the Americas. The first map below explains how this came to be. The Malagasy are however not a homogenously blended group but rather consisting of many diverse ethnic (sub)groups. Undoubtedly they will therefore show much individual variation themselves in their admixture compositions. If we were to make a purely hypothetical assumption that on average the Malagasy arriving in the US might have been a 50/50 mix of Southeast Asian and Southeast African. It then becomes an interesting excercise to speculate on what a percentage of inbetween 0.5%-2% Southeast Asian on 23andme might imply about the generational distance and also the potential number of Malagassy ancestors relocated to the US. Again in most cases it will probably represent a single and very diluted family lineage. But either way it will be ancestry which is relatively easier to track and possibly even identify.

Follow these links if you want to learn more about any possible Madagascar connection:


 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,893
Reputation
9,531
Daps
81,348
Actress, Aisha Tyler


giphy.gif




descends from Malagasy

Aisha’s maternal grandparents were Eugene Chandler Gregory (the son of Thomas Montgomery Gregory and Hugh Ella “Huella” Hancock) and Elaine Graham. Thomas Montgomery Gregory was a dramatist, educator, activist, and social philosopher; he was the son of James Monroe Gregory, a Professor of Latin and Dean at Howard University, whose grandparents were free blacks; and of Fannie Emma Hagan. Aisha’s great-grandmother Hugh was the daughter of Hugh Berry Hancock and Susie E. James.

Aisha’s great-great-grandmother Fannie Hagan’s mother, Margaret A. Mahammitt, was said to be the daughter of Jeremiah/Ali Mahomet, from Madagascar.


9d6jSzt.jpg


MIrEVtv.jpg



N2MQXfT.jpg


WK0GsNm.jpg



dbx1UPm.jpg



6BfBpiX.jpg



oyt0Mgq.jpg
 

Black Haven

We will find another road to glory!!!
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,175
Reputation
944
Daps
13,341
Muhammad Ali's great grandmother Sallie Ann was a slave from Madagascar.-
Muhammad’s paternal grandfather was Herman Heaton Clay (the son of John Henry Clay and Sarah “Sallie” Anne Frye/Fry). Herman was born in Kentucky. Sallie was said to have been born in Madagascar

Robert church mother was malagasy-
According to family accounts, Emmeline was the daughter of an enslaved "Malay" Malagasy princess and of a white planter from Lynchburg
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
20,361
Reputation
6,316
Daps
101,047
Sunday, June 8, 2014

Source: TAST Database


How sure are you that your family's alleged Native American ancestry was really Native American?

Several years ago, I read a post on the AfriGeneas African-Native American Genealogy Forum board of someone seeking information on the “Matagascan / Malagascan / Matogascan Creek Indians” because family lore claimed that her great-great-grandmother was from this “Indian” tribe. Another poster commented, “My mother's father always described his mother as being a full blooded Malagaskan Indian woman with long black hair down her back.” I even found a slave narrative of a man who also claimed this heritage. James Brittain of Mississippi relayed the following in his slave narrative about his grandmother:

"My grandma came from Virginia . . . When my grandma died she was one hundred and ten years old. She said she was a Molly Gasca negro. That was the race she belonged to. She sure did look different from any the rest of us. Her hair it was fine as silk and hung down below her waist. The folks said Old Miss was jealous of her and Old Master. I don't know how that was." (Source)

I began to associate the name “Malagascan” and “Molly Gasca” with Madagascar, an island located 250 miles off the southeastern African coast of Mozambique in the Indian Ocean. Being one of the largest islands in the world, Madagascar is roughly the size of Texas. The sounds of the names were almost phonetically identical.

Shortly afterwards, another poster in the AfriGeneas African-Native American Genealogy Forum soon wrote, “An elderly cousin told the story of my ggg-grandfather who was from a royal family of Madagascar Africa that was taken as a slave out of Madagascar Africa on a slave ship.” A third poster also recounted oral history of her ancestor being brought to Virginia from Madagascar. A fourth researcher, Monifaa, also communicated the following, “My mom's oldest brother has alleged to me that my ggg-grandmother was captured by slavers from the island of Madagascar and sold to cotton plantation owners in North Carolina.” Researcher Tracey Hughes discusses the discovery of her Madagascar ancestor in her blog post.

In Exchanging Our Country Mark, Michael Gomez wrote about the connection between "Madagascar Negroes" to Virginia; a small number of them were imported into Virginia during the early years of the transatlantic slave trade (p. 41). Gomez describes how those particular Africans were "yellowish" in complexion and had hair like a "Madagascar's."

Madagascar’s inhabitants are called the Malagasy people, and they speak a language by that name. Sources note that many of the Malagasy people possessed light skin and facial features very akin to people in Southeast Asia and Indonesia. Many others possessed darker skin and curly hair. Geneticists have determined that all of the Malagasy people descend from ancestors from Africa and Asia, specifically Borneo (source). I began to realize that, as time passed in America, Africans from Madagascar were characterized as being “Indians,” or “Black Indians.” I also wondered if some of the alleged Native American ancestry that many African Americans claim is actually Malagasy ancestry from Madagascar.

According to 23andMe, I have a small amount of Southeast Asian DNA on five chromosomes, totaling 0.5% of my ancestry composition. Since I have tested both of my parents with 23andMe (and later with AncestryDNA), 23andMe indicated that I inherited my Southeast Asian DNA from my father. His composition includes 1.4% Southeast Asianthat's scattered across six chromosomes. I began to speculate if our Southeast Asian DNA came from a Madagascar ancestor. Do I also have roots from Madagascar?

Well, I finally got my answer. A new DNA match, with the surname Ramalanjaona, appeared in my father's 23andMe database of DNA relatives. He shares 10 cM of identical DNA with my father on chromosome 12, with a predicted relationship of 5th cousins. They share a common ancestor at least six generations back. I didn't inherit this particular DNA segment, but one of my sisters did. Cousin Ramalanjaona indicates on his profile that he is Malagasy. I messaged him, and he confirmed that his parents are from Madagascar!

23andMe shows an ancestry composition chromosome painting, and Cousin Ramalanjaona shares identical DNA on one of the Southeast Asian segments on my father's chromosome 12. See figure below. This confirms that Southeast Asian ancestry is a great indicator of Malagasy ancestry and that my father likely had an ancestor from Madagascar. DNA Historian Fonte Felipe asserts, “The very fortunate circumstance about tracing any possible Madagascar ancestry is that it can be confirmed much more easily by way of the unique Southeast Asian component in Malagasy genetics and the inheritance of these markers among their descendants in the Americas.” (source) In July 2018, my father also gained another distant cousin DNA match from Madagascar in Ancestry DNA. Her last name is Ralalanirina.

Approximately 400,000 enslaved Africans were transported to America during the transatlantic slave trade, and only about 4,800 of them were from Madagascar. That is just 1%. They were transported via 17 documented slave voyages into New York and Virginia from Madagascar. Of that total, from 1719 to 1725, around 1,400 enslaved Africans from Madagascar were disembarked into Virginia through the Rappahannock and York River ports. Additionally, more were transported to the Caribbean, especially Jamaica and Barbados. Because my father had a number of enslaved Mississippi ancestors who were born in North Carolina and Virginia, I am theorizing that his enslaved Madagascar ancestorwas likely disembarked in Virginia. The Madagascar human imports into Virginia included the following:

May 18 1719; Vessel - Prince Eugene; 340 Africans; Port of Entry – York River
May 17, 1720; Vessel - Mercury; 466 Africans; Port of Entry – Rappahannock River
May 21, 1721; Vessel - Gascoigne; 133 Africans; Port of Entry – York River
June 21, 1721; Vessel - Prince Eugene; 103 Africans: Port of Entry – York River
June 26, 1721; Vessel - Snow Rebecca; 59 Africans; Port of Entry – York River
June 27, 1727; Vessel - Henrietta; 130 Africans; Port of Entry – York River
(Source: Virginia Slave-Trade Statistics 1698-1775 by Minchinton, King, and Waite)


For more research on Malagasy ancestry, check out Teresa Vega's The DNA Trail from Madagascar to Manhattan and Fonte Felipe's Tracing African Roots: Southeast Africa.

Roots Revealed: Got Roots in Madagascar?
 
Top