How many of you learned about the greatness of Max Christie in this thread?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06a1e/06a1efbefbbab8da3241e3c0b5f467004373a761" alt="mjlol :mjlol: :mjlol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06a1e/06a1efbefbbab8da3241e3c0b5f467004373a761" alt="mjlol :mjlol: :mjlol:"
Does that money work? I know Chet is still on his rookie deal. Not sure about Jalen. But thanks for actually providing a deal. And you do realize all this pick talk makes zero sense if Luka is the bolded right?It would have been Chet, Jalen, five unprotected 1sts, a lot of pick swaps. It would have been an elite deal.
This is not an elite deal. I would rather Chet than AD
Jalen than AD
OKC draft stash than AD
shyt, combine that shyt, fukk! Dallas ain't got no worries and even then, I would still think Dallas shouldn't trade Luka. You don't trade those those ones.
If you would have switched Luka name in this deal for Jimmy Butler. I would think it was a good deal. If you switch Luka name with Chet, I would think it's a horrendous deal for OKC. Luka though, this is one of the worst deals ever. If not ever.
I already said you can question the Mavs motives and the process all day.I mean the reality is if the Mavs truly cared about winning now they wouldn’t have traded the guy that’s led them to two deep playoff runs in the last 3 years for a player that’s 7 years older and who has a much worse track record as a #1
Lets call it what it is
SA doesn't have a Luka package, imo. They don't have a current player besides Wemby that would make me excited. Besides the Hawks pick this year, none of their picks are all that exciting. Certainly, not for Luka.I feel like I’ve said at least 5 times that AD is a great player and the Mavs will still be good this season. The question is how long will he be elite for years to come? Are you comfortable saying that 2-3 years from now AD will still be playing at this level? And if Dallas wasn’t comfortable paying 25 year old All-NBA 1st team MVP finalist Luka the supermax, what happens in those 2-3 years when a 34-35 year old AD can hit free agency and will want to be paid top dollar?
It’s not hard to imagine trade scenarios, it’s hard to know for sure what would’ve came across Nico’s desk for sure bc the opportunity was never given. Off the top of my head OKC, San Antonio, Houston and Orlando all had the ability to offer better packages long term.
They don’t want to believe,You keep running from the point that Luka on the open market would never have this deal as an option. It would be way better deals available. This was an NBA business deal.
How many of you learned about the greatness of Max Christie in this thread?
![]()
Fam you think the players are making bank and the teams aren’t? League revenue is split 50% so if the players are making more money than ever, so are the teams, a stoppage benefits no one
Also the team owners are the ones who pushed for things like the supermax and 2nd apron. Maybe they should’ve focused on the potential consequences instead of making stopping the Warriors their #1 priority![]()
I’m not saying “a cotdamn thing”? I didn’t type anything in a belittling tone so what’s with the condescension?As good as Kyrie and Brunson are, they're not on Luka's level, so for the purposes of the argument, yes, he did lead them to the WCF and Finals as a centerpiece. The game is 5v5, so you're not saying a cotdamn thing because every #1 option needs the right pieces around them to making extensive playoff runs. The moves that Nico made last season to surround Luka with were integral in getting them to the Finals, but that still doesn't mean Luka isn't the nucleus behind that success.
More to that point -
What did Kyrie do in the Finals last season when Luka was busting his ass and producing offense at a high level? What did the surrounding role players do when Luka was busting his ass and the only one to consistently show up on offense?
It hasn't impacted their team in any frame that you're insinuating it has. If it did, the Mavs wouldn't even be making the playoffs, let alone making extensive runs.
If the Mavs fail to go back to the Finals this season, then what possible detriment and normalization of Luka's foilables could you possibly use as jusfication for holding back the Mavs? If he's this great threat to them getting over the hump, and they don't end up having any championship success without him, then what you're saying doesn't hold any weight, whatsoever, you do know that right?
Does this sound like his lack of defense trickled down to the rest of the team where they didn't feel like they have to do hard work -
![]()
Naji Marshall doubles down on defiant Luka Doncic take at perfect time
Dallas Mavericks wing Naji Marshall is slowly becoming a fan favorite, and a recent take on Luka Doncic is going to make Mavs fans love him even more.thesmokingcuban.com
![]()
Klay Thompson boldly confronts the biggest critique of Luka Doncic
Dallas Mavericks guard Klay Thompson came to Luka Doncic's defense regarding the biggest knock in his game.thesmokingcuban.com
And every franchise would've gladly supermax'd Chuck too (if he existed in the now).
Not every franchise centerpiece has to be this idealized, perfect player. Why are you making out like they have to be in order for a team to keep them? The Mavs won't be getting a player of Luka's caliber anytime soon, so why get rid of him?
His flaws are irrelevant.
It's not like they're moving Luka for a better player or to improve their chances, in the long term. I don't know why the obviousness of this needs to be pointed out. Unless you're of the belief the Mavs are going to start stacking championships with a 33-year-old Kyrie and a 32-year-old AD. If you don't believe that, then why do you think his flaws are relevant here?