As good as Kyrie and Brunson are, they're not on Luka's level, so for the purposes of the argument, yes, he did lead them to the WCF and Finals as a centerpiece. The game is 5v5, so you're not saying a cotdamn thing because every #1 option needs the right pieces around them to making extensive playoff runs. The moves that Nico made last season to surround Luka with were integral in getting them to the Finals, but that still doesn't mean Luka isn't the nucleus behind that success.He took the Mavs to the WCF with Brunson.
He took the Mavs to the Finals with Kyrie.
He didn’t just drag these teams by himself, that’s disingenuous.
Without those level of talent or the defense that helped him get to the finals last season, it isn’t a foregone conclusion the lakers will have the same success Luka had with the Mavs.
More to that point -
What did Kyrie do in the Finals last season when Luka was busting his ass and producing offense at a high level? What did the surrounding role players do when Luka was busting his ass and the only one to consistently show up on offense?
It hasn't impacted their team in any frame that you're insinuating it has. If it did, the Mavs wouldn't even be making the playoffs, let alone making extensive runs.Luka’s flaws being brought up is because it has impacted their team. Your best player doesn’t care about how he carries his weight or defense, it trickles down to the rest team & normalizes you don’t have to do the hard work.
If the Mavs fail to go back to the Finals this season, then what possible detriment and normalization of Luka's foilables could you possibly use as jusfication for holding back the Mavs? If he's this great threat to them getting over the hump, and they don't end up having any championship success without him, then what you're saying doesn't hold any weight, whatsoever, you do know that right?
Does this sound like his lack of defense trickled down to the rest of the team where they didn't feel like they have to do hard work -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/426f0/426f0eb8a161302b6fd23eb602d3d8e6d28d0a94" alt="thesmokingcuban.com"
Naji Marshall doubles down on defiant Luka Doncic take at perfect time
Dallas Mavericks wing Naji Marshall is slowly becoming a fan favorite, and a recent take on Luka Doncic is going to make Mavs fans love him even more.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d980/7d980144b31933f4d06fa24c3b6e024740949041" alt="thesmokingcuban.com"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4eca9/4eca9763e9a0248490da59f6ea7e455da4539c82" alt="thesmokingcuban.com"
Klay Thompson boldly confronts the biggest critique of Luka Doncic
Dallas Mavericks guard Klay Thompson came to Luka Doncic's defense regarding the biggest knock in his game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d980/7d980144b31933f4d06fa24c3b6e024740949041" alt="thesmokingcuban.com"
And every franchise would've gladly supermax'd Chuck too (if he existed in the now).Reminds me of Charles Barkley in a way, went to the Finals (like Luka), rebounding, scoring menace (like Luka), weight issues (like Luka), lack of defense (like Luka), won MVP (we shall see with Luka), never won a ring (again, we shall see).
Not every franchise centerpiece has to be this idealized, perfect player. Why are you making out like they have to be in order for a team to keep them? The Mavs won't be getting a player of Luka's caliber anytime soon, so why get rid of him?
His flaws are irrelevant.You’re essentially propping his accomplishments and downplaying his flaws that could be detrimental to potential success. It’s not a fair and balanced argument, it’s actually biased.
It's not like they're moving Luka for a better player or to improve their chances, in the long term. I don't know why the obviousness of this needs to be pointed out. Unless you're of the belief the Mavs are going to start stacking championships with a 33-year-old Kyrie and a 32-year-old AD. If you don't believe that, then why do you think his flaws are relevant here?