Low key, NFL rules favoring the passing game = player safety initiative

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,738
Reputation
3,601
Daps
97,903
I've been thinking about this for a while and mentioned it in that thread that jadillac had about the NFL being ruined, but the more I think about it, the more I think it was done on purpose. Think about all the concussion and injury problems the NFL is dealing with now. It's all about reducing the number of heads-up collisions.



Think about the amount of bodies that are flying towards each other and instantly colliding on the average running play, and the amount on the average passing play.

Remember that the game was about to be banned by the President of the United States himself because it was too dangerous and the introduction of the legal forward pass was introduced immediately. :ohhh:

The flying wedge formation was also banned due to its serious contribution to injuries (curiously enough, it's also banned in rugby for this same reason). Nearly a century later, they've finally banned wedges on kickoffs for this exact reason.

Also, although the league has been mum player safety and the impact on brain injuries in the public until now, we're finally start to get evidence that they have known for a long time. Remember that we have documents released recently that showed that an internal NFL board ruled that Mike Webster's condition had been caused by football and was sneaking him some disability payments on the low. Some others were getting these payments also. This while theydidn't know what anyone else was talking about in the public.


Put this all together, along with all the extra rules on defensive holding, contact downfield, and pass interference, I believe the league has done all this in an effort to get teams to pass the ball more and, hopefully, cut down on the rate of major injuries. Star QBs are also being protected more not only because it's good to have "stars" on the field, but also because when teams usually go to their backups, they run the ball too much. Wouldn't have been too much of a problem before, but in terms of player safety and the fact that the passing game is less dangerous than the running game, it makes so much sense.


I don't think they'll ever ban the running game, since that would be way too radical of a change, but they'll just find ways to make the passing game more attractive to teams and keep on finding more and more ways to tinker with the kickoffs (like the recent rule on bunching during onside kicks) and punt returns, since it's just special teams in the eyes of most casual fans.
 

malbaker86

Gators
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,991
Reputation
7,120
Daps
124,863
Reppin
Jacksonville, FL
I agree and I have a question too; why don't they mandate MRI's on current players yearly so they can assest the amount of brain damage they have or don't have? Wouldn't that help a helluva lot more?
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
27,792
Reputation
4,712
Daps
103,465
Remember that the game was about to be banned by the President of the United States himself because it was too dangerous and the introduction of the legal forward pass was introduced immediately. :ohhh:

Did not know this....who was this?

The renewed emphasis on defensive holding and illegal contact were a direct result of Bill Polian and the Colts bytching about the Patriots....but the overall premise seems plausible.
 

jfkennedy

Best After Bobby
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
11,413
Reputation
1,085
Daps
18,512
I agree and I have a question too; why don't they mandate MRI's on current players yearly so they can assest the amount of brain damage they have or don't have? Wouldn't that help a helluva lot more?

This actually sounds like a good idea. I'd be curious to know the difference between a guy in his first year, and 7th.
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,738
Reputation
3,601
Daps
97,903
Did not know this....who was this?

The renewed emphasis on defensive holding and illegal contact were a direct result of Bill Polian and the Colts bytching about the Patriots....but the overall premise seems plausible.

Teddy Roosevelt.

I was going to mention that AFC Championship game and the whining after it, but I decided against it. :laugh:

I agree and I have a question too; why don't they mandate MRI's on current players yearly so they can assest the amount of brain damage they have or don't have? Wouldn't that help a helluva lot more?

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

is the big thing that's scaring everyone about brain injuries, and it can't really be diagnosed without a full biopsy. Since we're talking about the brain, we actually have to wait for the person to die before we can check it out. Our current imaging techniques are not good enough.
 

malbaker86

Gators
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,991
Reputation
7,120
Daps
124,863
Reppin
Jacksonville, FL
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

is the big thing that's scaring everyone about brain injuries, and it can't really be diagnosed without a full biopsy. Since we're talking about the brain, we actually have to wait for the person to die before we can check it out. Our current imaging techniques are not good enough.


Ok that makes sense as they can't REALLY examine it because it's not as simple as viewing a MRI or they'd already had this in place. Hopefully there is SOMETHING, ANYTHING in the future that will allow players the ability to have themselves examined to determine the state of their brains while they are active players.
 
Top