Louisiana Bill Would Make Bible the "Official State Book"

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
Louisiana bill would name Bible as official state book | Fox News

BATON ROUGE, La. – Lawmakers are moving ahead with a proposal to name the Bible as Louisiana's official state book, despite concerns the bill would land the Legislature in court.

A House municipal committee advanced the bill Thursday with an 8-5 vote, sending it to the full House for debate.

Rep. Thomas Carmody, R-Shreveport, said he sponsored the proposal after a constituent made the request. But Carmody insisted the bill wasn't designed to be a state-endorsement of Christianity or a specific religion.

"It's not to the exclusion of anyone else's sacred literature," he told the House committee. Again, later he said, "This is not about establishing an official religion of the state of Louisiana."

Lawmakers who voted against the measure said it raises questions about whether Louisiana would be violating the separation of church and state.

Rep. Wesley Bishop, D-New Orleans, said as a preacher's son, he loved the concept. But he said as a lawyer, he thinks the bill has problems. He voted against the measure.

"I think we're going to open ourselves up to a lawsuit. You can't adopt the Bible and not adopt Christianity," he said.

Other lawmakers objected to Carmody's proposal to use a specific version of the Bible, so that language was stripped from the bill before it was passed.

Rep. Barbara Norton, D-Shreveport, said she didn't feel qualified to "vote on anything that's related to the Bible," so she voted against it.

Rep. Ebony Woodruff, D-Harvey, said adopting the Bible as the state's official book could be offensive to people who live in the state and who aren't Christian.

"You're OK with offending some of the citizens of this state?" she asked.

"It's not meant to be offensive," Carmody replied. "There's no requirement that they would have to follow this particular text."

Voting for the bill were Reps. Taylor Barras, R-New Iberia; Johnny Berthelot, R-Gonzales; Robert Billiot, D-Westwego; Terry Brown, I-Colfax; Mike Danahay, D-Sulphur; Dalton Honore, D-Baton Rouge; Stephen Ortego, D-Carencro; and Tom Willmott, R-Kenner.

Voting against the bill were Bishop, Norton, Woodruff and Reps. Jared Brossett, D-New Orleans, and Austin Badon, D-New Orleans, chairman of the committee.

______________________________________________________________________________________


Somehow a Bible is not offensive or establishing a state religion, yet if someone proposed the same with the Quran, these people would be screaming about a Muslim takeover.
 

bigDeeOT

Banned
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
739
Reputation
-640
Daps
406
"It's not to the exclusion of anyone else's sacred literature," he told the House committee. Again, later he said, "This is not about establishing an official religion of the state of Louisiana."

That doesn't make any sense. You can't say in one instance that there's no official religion of the state, and yet the official "book" of the state is the bible.
 

ltheghost

Payin Debts.... N40
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
6,503
Reputation
480
Daps
7,435
Reppin
Japan, but from the 989
Endorsing religion. Violation of the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment. The Establishment Clause has generally been interpreted to prohibit 1) the establishment of a national religion by Congress, or 2) the preference by the U.S. government of one religion over another. The first approach is called the "separation" or "no aid" interpretation, while the second approach is called the "non-preferential" or "accommodation" interpretation. The accommodation interpretation prohibits Congress from preferring one religion over another, but does not prohibit the government's entry into religious domain to make accommodations in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.

They better get ready to make a WHOLE bunch of official state books. Or it is going to look they are preferring one religious book over another.
 
Last edited:

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
The atheist mafia isnt strong in LA so i doubt it seriously, friend.

Why are you bringing up atheists, friend? Most of the opposition for this comes from other Christians who don't use the same Bible, Jews, Muslims, and other religious people. Atheists make up a small percent of the population.
 

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,041
Daps
43,614
Reppin
Los Angeles
Why are you bringing up atheists, friend? Most of the opposition for this comes from other Christians who don't use the same Bible, Jews, Muslims, and other religious people. Atheists make up a small percent of the population.
No Christian will sue the state for using the Bible as the state book. Lets be real, it will be some atheist troll with nothing better to do with his life.[DOUBLEPOST=1397488611][/DOUBLEPOST]
It literally only takes one person to sue breh.
I know its a shame right.
 
Top