Lawmaker Kills Repair Bill Because 'Cellphones Are Throwaways'

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
52,796
Reputation
8,009
Daps
151,001
Lawmaker Kills Repair Bill Because 'Cellphones Are Throwaways'

A New Hampshire lawmaker suggested that we shouldn't fix the $1,000 devices we buy and instead we will "just get a new one."
by Matthew Gault
Oct 25 2019, 10:53am
ShareTweet
Snap

Image: Getty Images

The New Hampshire State House rejected the Digital Fair Repair Act earlier this week in part thanks to a representative who seems to think that cell phones are literally garbage that no one should bother repairing.

The bill would have forced manufacturers such as Apple to share repair manuals and parts with independent repair stores. House members didn’t kill the bill, but sent it back to committee for a year of interim study, citing security concerns and, in the words of Rep. John Potucek (R-Derry) the ubiquity, cheapness, and—in his opinion—disposability of new smart phones.

“In the near future, cellphones are throwaways,” Potucek said, according to New Hampshire Business Review. “Everyone will just get a new one.”

That is, of course, the problem that right to repair is trying to solve.

The new iPhone 11 costs between $699 and $1,349. And it can be hard to find one at the moment. Google’s Pixel 4 costs between $799 and $999. Manufacturers seal smartphones to make it difficult to replace the battery and do basic repairs. Often, getting repairs through the company is so expensive that people simply purchase a new phone. Apple’s repair monopoly is so dominant that it’s the center of an investigation by the United States House of Representatives’ Judiciary Committee.

Right to repair advocates aren’t buying Potucek’s reasoning.

"If you told someone 15 years ago that by 2019 cellphones would cost $1,000 and be 'throwaway' device—and you wouldn't even bother to replace batteries—that very idea would seem completely absurd,” Nathan Proctor, the Director of the Campaign for the Right to Repair at US PIRG, told Motherboard in an email. “We might be more used to that idea in 2019, but it’s no less absurd. We are in danger of losing the basic ability to fix our stuff outside of manufacturer control, and we need legislators to stand up for their constituents right to repair."

“At our three locations throughout [New Hampshire], we serve tens of thousands of our neighbors and visitors each year,” Chad Johansen, president of NH iPhone Repair, said in an email. “Many of our customers are happy with their devices and would rather spend $100 to fix their current device instead of $1000 for a new one with little to no updates or added features. Now the [manufacturers] such as Apple and Samsung are making it harder for residents of NH to repair the devices they own.”

Twenty states had right-to-repair legislation on the ballot this year. The bills haven’t passed in any states, but the legislative season isn’t over yet. In Massachusetts, the State House held a three-hour long hearing on its Digital Right to Repair Act. Right-to-repair advocates are hopeful the act will pass in Massachusetts, where the legislation is patterned after a similar measure that passed in 2012 which gave independent auto shops the right to repair.

The right-to-repair movement is at a critical stage. The Federal Trade Commission is studying the issue, and Democratic presidential candidates Elzbath Warren and Bernie Sanders have called for national right-to-repair laws.

Rep. John Potucek did not respond to Motherboard’s request for comment.
 

stave

Superstar
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Messages
4,780
Reputation
1,056
Daps
18,579
One of the reasons I despise batteries that require the phone be unsealed. But for what seems like to be the majority of folks, this is okay because the phone gets replaced every year or two. Now those manufacturers can hire lobbyists to go kill logical bills like this off and it doesn't seem like a big deal and nobody cares.
 

Strapped

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
42,802
Reputation
1,475
Daps
52,423
Reppin
404
Biggest draw back is the sealed battery that degrades in 1.5 years :pacspit::mjpls:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
52,796
Reputation
8,009
Daps
151,001
One of the reasons I despise batteries that require the phone be unsealed. But for what seems like to be the majority of folks, this is okay because the phone gets replaced every year or two. Now those manufacturers can hire lobbyists to go kill logical bills like this off and it doesn't seem like a big deal and nobody cares.

Biggest draw back is the sealed battery that degrades in 1.5 years :pacspit::mjpls:

people gonna be forced to be handy so they can disassemble their own phones and replace the batteries :manny:
 

Macallik86

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
6,428
Reputation
1,377
Daps
21,037
Wild

In exchange for selling them repair parts, Samsung requires independent repair shops to give Samsung the name, contact information, phone identifier, and customer complaint details of everyone who gets their phone repaired at these shops, according to a contract obtained by 404 Media. Stunningly, it also requires these nominally independent shops to “immediately disassemble” any phones that customers have brought them that have been previously repaired with aftermarket or third-party parts and to “immediately notify” Samsung that the customer has used third-party parts.

"Company shall immediately disassemble all products that are created or assembled out of, comprised of, or that contain any Service Parts not purchased from Samsung,” a section of the agreement reads. “And shall immediately notify Samsung in writing of the details and circumstances of any unauthorized use or misappropriation of any Service Part for any purpose other than pursuant to this Agreement. Samsung may terminate this Agreement if these terms are violated."

Read the rest of the article here:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
52,796
Reputation
8,009
Daps
151,001

Json

Superstar
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
12,384
Reputation
1,338
Daps
37,516
Reppin
Central VA
this is a massive invasion of privacy.
That’s why I said nobody cared about the TikTok privacy concerns

The government has trained us to just accept these types of info breeches between the constant password/credit leaks and smartphone information gathering on websites.
 

MR. SNIFLES

**** YOU THUNDAAAAAAAAAAH
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
20,446
Reputation
6,169
Daps
81,995
Reppin
THUNDER BUDDIES
YOU WOULD HAVE TO IMMEDIATELY GIVE UP WATER RESISTANT PHONES. PART OF THE REASONING FOR SEALING THE PHONES WAS FOR WATER PROOFING.

WATER DAMAGE CLAIMS WERE MUCH HIGHER THAN BATTERY CLAIMS FOR WARRANTIES. BATTERIES GENERALLY OUTLAST THE USEFULNESS OF THE PHONE. BY THE TIME THE BATTERY DIES, YOUR PHONE LIKELY IS NOT RECEIVING UPDATES ANYMORE.
 

east

Screwed up... till tha casket drops!!
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
4,943
Reputation
3,080
Daps
15,513
Reppin
The Bronx ➡️ New England
YOU WOULD HAVE TO IMMEDIATELY GIVE UP WATER RESISTANT PHONES. PART OF THE REASONING FOR SEALING THE PHONES WAS FOR WATER PROOFING.

WATER DAMAGE CLAIMS WERE MUCH HIGHER THAN BATTERY CLAIMS FOR WARRANTIES. BATTERIES GENERALLY OUTLAST THE USEFULNESS OF THE PHONE. BY THE TIME THE BATTERY DIES, YOUR PHONE LIKELY IS NOT RECEIVING UPDATES ANYMORE.
xcover6 pro has a removable battery and is pretty water resistant, ppl just don't wanna sacrifice having thin phones for durability
 

Capitol

Did this work
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
14,306
Reputation
1,477
Daps
32,824
YOU WOULD HAVE TO IMMEDIATELY GIVE UP WATER RESISTANT PHONES. PART OF THE REASONING FOR SEALING THE PHONES WAS FOR WATER PROOFING.

WATER DAMAGE CLAIMS WERE MUCH HIGHER THAN BATTERY CLAIMS FOR WARRANTIES. BATTERIES GENERALLY OUTLAST THE USEFULNESS OF THE PHONE. BY THE TIME THE BATTERY DIES, YOUR PHONE LIKELY IS NOT RECEIVING UPDATES ANYMORE.
What do you mean "outlast the usefulness " the hardware is more than often still completely functionally but made obsolete by software to create this perpetual cycle of fueling an industry that is actively screwing us
 
Top