Scottie Drippin
Should Never Mention Me
Am I going crazy and forgetting about someone or has it been forever since this happened? The last people I could think of are Zab, B-Hop, Roy, and Lennox
he got stripped of it because he didnt fight abraham....which is how it ended up in germany for some time and in hindsight it only delayed the inevitable lolI never mind you just talking about 3 belts
Jermaine taylor was probably the last one, I don't even know what happened to the IBF belt he won from hopkin
he got stripped of it because he didnt fight abraham....which is how it ended up in germany for some time and in hindsight it only delayed the inevitable lol
[
so what the fukk happened to zab's wba belt he got from corey, he got that stripped too
yeah..when zab lost to baldomir baldomir only paid the sanctioning fee for the wbc belt...not for wba and ibf..so wba stripped him of the belt because judah was no champ..the right thing to do...ibf should have too but didnt
I remember now, some body else was the regular WBA champion, and Zab was the super champ, but since you can only be the super champion if hold multiple belts, they striped him of the super title, I don't think his WBA belt was ever on the line in the first place
yeah it was my homie jose..he was the first of the "regular" champions
it wasnt on the line because baldomir didnt want to pay the fee for the other belts because it would have ate his purse..its shame
Thurman got elevated to Regular Champ a couple weeks agothey never should've did that super champ shyt, holding multiple belts is enough prestige, now you got guys getting a belt thinking they champions when they ain't, whenever the super belt is awaarde
like at 147 I don't even think there's a regular WBA champion because Thurman is the interim which doesn't really make any damn sense, and Floyd is the super champ
Thurman got elevated to Regular Champ a couple weeks ago
Both belts would be on the line. If Thurman fought Floyd and lost, he'd lose his belt.So if he goes against Floyd for his last fight, who's belt would be on the line, if Thurman loses does he still get to be the regular champ
would the winner be the super regular champion, shyt don't make any goddamn sense
getting awarded the ring belt is enough to distinguish champions, that's why I'm glad Canelo turned down the regular WBA belt at 154
Both belts would be on the line. If Thurman fought Floyd and lost, he'd lose his belt.
The WBA been on some bullshyt for too long. The interim belt is enough, nikkas don't need to add the regular shyt either.
If it were up to me, all the interim titles would be done away with.