LAPD Investigating Dr. Dre's Ex Wife For Alleged Embezzlement

BK The Great

Veteran
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
57,938
Reputation
6,218
Daps
143,187
Reppin
BK NY
Dr. Dre's estranged wife, Nicole Young, is being investigated by the LAPD for alleged embezzlement ... sources close to the case tell TMZ.

We're told Dre's business partner, Larry Chatman, recently went to the police and filed a report, claiming Nicole withdrew hundreds of thousands of dollars from their business account without authorization ... something Larry had previously alleged in legal letters fired off to Nicole's side in the past few weeks.

In the report to LAPD, Dre's team claims Nicole embezzled $385,029. We're told LAPD detectives are aware Larry believes Nicole is the culprit, and they're looking into it now. For the record, Dre did not file the report.

As we previously reported ... Dre's called out Nicole for 2 withdrawals -- which total the $385k -- in their divorce case. Nicole has said she had a right to the money in that corporate account because her name is on it.

If charges are brought forth from this, it's possible Nicole could do time.

Nicole's legal team has previously told us Chatman's claims against her are nothing but a smear attempt and a PR stunt as she navigates her pending divorce from Dre. Her attorneys maintain she's done nothing wrong thus far.

We've reached out to Nicole's lawyer again about the police investigation ... so far, no word back.

 

Harry B

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
30,975
Reputation
-1,236
Daps
62,325
This broads answer to everything is that she has the right to it from Dr Dres name to their shared accounts :mjlol:

I can bet that Dre offered her something really nice, that would set her up for life. But she wanted the whole arm. I hope she gets nothing at all, like 50s baby moms who was getting 25k per month, sued for 50k ended up with 5k and a burned down house :to:
 

Jimmy Two-Times™

Coli Mods Catch Me If U Can Forgive Me Imma Ridah™
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
27,997
Reputation
5,922
Daps
61,780
Reppin
Peckham™ Come Get Me!
This broads answer to everything is that she has the right to it from Dr Dres name to their shared accounts :mjlol:

I can bet that Dre offered her something really nice, that would set her up for life. But she wanted the whole arm. I hope she gets nothing at all, like 50s baby moms who was getting 25k per month, sued for 50k ended up with 5k and a burned down house :to:
Jimmy Henchman burned that house down. It was just a coincidence since they'd been separated for at least 4 years by that point.

Henchman was firebombing or shooting homes that belonged to anyone in G-Unit responsible for slapping his son.

But back to the topic, yeah, Dre's gonna beat her up in court.:mjgrin:
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
19,491
Reputation
3,349
Daps
45,858
wasn't this reported weeks ago... it should't take that long to figure out if the money belonged to her or not lol. sounds like bs
 

SleezyBigSlim

Banned
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
19,882
Reputation
-1,505
Daps
52,893
idk but she admitted she made the withdrawal. usually if someone admits something, it's a court case if the cops really have evidence against them. so i guess they don't have evidence of wrongdoing.
She never denied withdrawing the money her argument is she's entitled to it as her name is on the account. Even if he put his wife on the business account if she's not an officer in any of his companies she not entitled to that shyt. I would have my lawyer spin it like she was only supposed to have a de it/credit card to that account and nothing more. Actually I'm pretty sure that's exactly what Dre did. He covered all bases. She did what all bitter about to have a divorce bytches do try to empty out ya account.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
19,491
Reputation
3,349
Daps
45,858
She never denied withdrawing the money her argument is she's entitled to it as her name is on the account. Even if he put his wife on the business account if she's not an officer in any of his companies she not entitled to that shyt.

according to the report, she is not claiming her name is on the account, she is claiming she owns the business. that trumps being "an officer" of a business. officers aren't even entitled to nothing but their job lol
yall be confusing positions with ownership. an owner can usually fire any officer
 
Top