Kareem on Dirk: "One trick pony"

KOBE

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
7,699
Reputation
1,100
Daps
34,322
Nice bait thread title breh.

All he's saying is that Dirk would have been a better player, and considered a better player, had he done more in the other parts of his game than just scoring. Don't fully agree, as he was a decent rebounder earlier on in his career, but he's right about the defense and it's kind of an obvious statement that he'd have ended up higher on the all time list if he was a better defender than what he was.
 

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
31,596
Reputation
4,913
Daps
104,536
kareem is a bozo. he also said dirk should have went to college. :mjlol:
Dirk was never asked to crash the offensive glass, both by the Mavericks' philosophy and because it didn't make sense due to his play on the perimeter. But the scrawny German rookie that entered the league in 1998 became the No. 8 all-time defensive rebounder in NBA history. Dirk's rebounding percentage, 21.6 percent, is virtually identical to Abdul-Jabbar's 21.7 percent. Dirk was also highly, highly efficient, turning the ball over on only eight percent of his possessions -- an almost invisible skill because it involves not making bad plays, but a huge part of Dirk's dominant play.
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar says Dirk's career wasn't 'dominant' and he's very wrong


:jbhmm:
 

KOBE

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
7,699
Reputation
1,100
Daps
34,322
kareem is a bozo. he also said dirk should have went to college. :mjlol:

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar says Dirk's career wasn't 'dominant' and he's very wrong


:jbhmm:

What a dumb post.

First of all, Kareem's first four years(when he averaged 14.5, 16, 16.6, and 16.1 rebound per game) aren't even included in his career rebounding statistics: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar

Secondly, Kareem never had a defensive rebounding percentage lower than 21.5 until he was 34, which was his 13th year in the league. Dirk's numbers have remained consistent as well, but trying to excuse his piss poor offensive rebounding doesn't work. Great offensive rebounders aren't "asked" to crash the glass to get the boards, they're just great at doing it. Even Dirk was great at getting offensive boards he'd probably be "asked" to do it more often.

Thirdly, there is no comparison between Kareem and Dirk as Kareem was the far and away better player. :usure:
 

ALonelyDad

Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
76,190
Reputation
9,214
Daps
335,835
He is right..let's say Dirk defended and rebounded like KG with his own offensive game, that is a top 5 ever potential player. He isn't downplaying what Dirk did but he is saying if he had an all around game, he could have been in that conversation.
 

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
31,596
Reputation
4,913
Daps
104,536
He is right..let's say Dirk defended and rebounded like KG with his own offensive game, that is a top 5 ever potential player. He isn't downplaying what Dirk did but he is saying if he had an all around game, he could have been in that conversation.
And where did that get KG? Dirk's front office blew it time and time again. Fact is, scoring > everything, especially when you have a guy that can score on his own in crunch time. That is the reason Dirk could be a cornerstone for a contender without major all stars, and KG could not.

People act like Magic or bird didnt have flaws. :rudy:

All these guys do is nitpick modern players, but bring up anything about the past, and the same ole lines come out "it was a different era" :whoa: "they werent asked to do those sorts of things":whoa:

In the postseason, dirk's rebounding or defense was never why they lost.

What a dumb post.

First of all, Kareem's first four years(when he averaged 14.5, 16, 16.6, and 16.1 rebound per game) aren't even included in his career rebounding statistics: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar

Secondly, Kareem never had a defensive rebounding percentage lower than 21.5 until he was 34, which was his 13th year in the league. Dirk's numbers have remained consistent as well, but trying to excuse his piss poor offensive rebounding doesn't work. Great offensive rebounders aren't "asked" to crash the glass to get the boards, they're just great at doing it. Even Dirk was great at getting offensive boards he'd probably be "asked" to do it more often.

Thirdly, there is no comparison between Kareem and Dirk as Kareem was the far and away better player. :usure:
kareem's rebounding numbers are drastically inflated by the era he was in. Stop it.
 

KOBE

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
7,699
Reputation
1,100
Daps
34,322
kareem's rebounding numbers are drastically inflated by the era he was in. Stop it.

The era he was in? You mean with short players? Like 6'8/6'9" power forwards like we have now?

Or 6'6' forwards like Barkley/Rodman?

Or is height not actually a good indication of rebounding ability, which we've seen in the likes of Bargnani and Lopez?
 

itsyoung!!

Banned
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,914
Reputation
6,689
Daps
110,422
Reppin
Bay Area
Dirk is a top 20-25 player of all time and im sure dallas fans have him near the top 15. Not everyone can be top 5 or top 10 and thats ok..

Dirk legacy as one of the best to step on the court is cemented..Him being better on defense would people really rank him higher than the players generally accepted as top 10? Probably not.. So saying he coulda been better on defense really isnt gonna change dirks legacy much
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
69,978
Reputation
11,084
Daps
236,413
Did not watch the vid, but that can be said for any player. Actually when some of us Coli brehs say that Shaq could've been even better more often than not all hell breaks loose :yeshrug:
Not true. When LeBron had to face the Mavericks in the finals, people always say Dirk won it as a lone star when in reality, he was allowed to be a one dimensional player while the rest of the team made up for everything else. Hakeem, LeBron, Kobe and others all had to do it on both sides of the court. I have long said that Dirk had that luxury of being one-dimensional and still winning
 
Top