Jim Trotter Calls Out Stephen A. Smith

aceboon

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
35,342
Reputation
3,979
Daps
117,373
Reppin
NULL
background, Trotter was working for the NFL Network and had pressed Roger Goodell about the lack of diversity in NFL head coaches/front office during the Super Bowl week press conference. His contract wasn't renewed and now he's suing the NFL for discrimination.


Trotter appeared recently on a Slate.com podcast with Jason Johnson. During the conversation, Trotter expressed regret regarding the manner in which some in the media are handling his case.

Trotter mentioned one in particular: ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith.

Here’s the full content of Trotter’s explanation on his point of journalists talking about the case without fully investigating its allegations or understanding the legal principles that support it.

“The biggest disappointment in this whole process for me has been the people who are journalists who speak on my case without actually reading the complaint, or without talking to me first about it,” Trotter told Johnson. “So Stephen A. Smith has the Commissioner on his show, and he asks the Commissioner about my contract not being renewed and the Commissioner says, ‘Oh, it was just a budget cut thing.’ So when that was all over, I texted him. And I said, ‘Man, I saw the interview. I just wish you had called me first to get some background and it would have shown you that what the Commissioner said was untrue.’

“He comes back and says to me, ‘That’s on you. We had been advertising the Commissioner was coming on for a week and a half, and I also spoke to a mutual friend who gave me background on the case.’

“So I had texted him back, and I said — and you know, I’m trying to be cool, because I’m not into this Black man on Black man, you know, crime thing — and I said to him, I said, ‘A lot of assumptions there. But I also thought as journalists we were taught you go directly to the source and not to second-hand information.’

“And now that set him off. I got all caps coming at me, I got exclamation points coming at me and all this other stuff. And he’s telling me how this wasn’t about me, and ESPN is a partner with the NFL, and he didn’t have to ask Roger Goodell that question at all, and this, that, and the other. And so finally I said to him, ‘Well, you can have me on to give my side.’ I said, ‘Your move.’ And he said, again, the exclamation points, ‘That ain’t happening. This wasn’t about you. And I did you a courtesy by even getting the Commissioner to comment on it.’

“So anyway at the end of it I just said, ‘A courtesy, huh?’ I said, ‘Man, I appreciate you.’ And I left it alone.

“And I got to thinking, I’m like, as journalists are we simply seeking a comment, or are we seeking the truth? So don’t sit up here and tell me what a great journalist you are if all you are seeking is a comment, instead of the truth.

“You can disagree with me. You can tell me I’m an idiot for filing the lawsuit. And as you went on your podcast and said, ‘I should have known what was gonna happen.’ And I didn’t even see it, people were texting me about his podcast, where he says he reached out to two Black executives not at the NFL or ESPN and asked them, ‘What would they have done if someone like me had put them on the spot like that publicly?’ And they both said, ‘They would have got my ass up out of there.’

“And what I wanted to say to him, ‘Do you even understand the law?’ Because if either of those individuals had done that to someone, they would be breaking the law. But you’re gonna go ahead and say I should know what could happen? There’s a difference between knowing what could happen and the consequences of those actions. So, to me, that’s the only disappointing thing in this whole process is that I would just ask journalists, if you’re gonna speak on this, I don’t mind you having an opinion — you can tell me I was foolish, whatever you want — all I ask is that you read the complaint, or that if you have questions, you call me. I don’t think that’s too much to ask.”
 

Squirrel from Meteor Man

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
26,412
Reputation
3,118
Daps
117,758
SAS is the ultimate company man and boot lick. It took ESPN paying Pat Mcafee double or triple what he makes for him to realize he’s expendable and needs his own platform.

I heard the podcast where he spoke about Jim Trotter and he was soft-shoeing, no doubt about it. SAS is only about getting black folks on as long as they’re not rocking his boat.
 

Trav

Marathon Mentality 🏁
Supporter
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
30,162
Reputation
5,599
Daps
83,892
Reppin
TMC 8-24
ezgif-3-d12bf3c9d8.gif
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
19,384
Reputation
3,085
Daps
52,087
Reppin
NULL
The thought of SAS furiously typing in all caps got me :mjlol:. He been told everybody he lives by the golden rule:

"He who has the gold makes the rules"

Beyond that this nikka think he is a mob boss now :russ:. Dude be talking so reckless. He aint taking shyt off nobody, except his bosses.
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
19,384
Reputation
3,085
Daps
52,087
Reppin
NULL
SAS is the ultimate company man and boot lick. It took ESPN paying Pat Mcafee double or triple what he makes for him to realize he’s expendable and needs his own platform.

I heard the podcast where he spoke about Jim Trotter and he was soft-shoeing, no doubt about it. SAS is only about getting black folks on as long as they’re not rocking his boat.
He is about doing what he wants to do in his terms...unless the bosses say otherwise :unimpressed: . Epitome of middle management.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
52,048
Reputation
18,952
Daps
283,647
He's always been a corporate mouth piece. I'm not saying he needs to hem up Goodell and ask him what's really going on...but you can't call yourself a journalist and have zero interest in rocking the boat or questioning authorities. He's the ultimate protect-the-shield guy. He will lampoon a player for the most minor of offenses but let an ESPN partner fukk something up and he's gonna do whatever it takes to make it go away.

This is a guy who worships success and money. He's not gonna do anything to prevent him from moving into a more expensive/higher floor level NY apartment every few years. I'd imagine he's disgusted by the success of Pat McAffe and is looking for a way to raise his profile but the bullshyt he does has a clear ceiling. You can find someone yelling about black athletes being lazy anywhere. He needs a new schtick.
 

T-K-G

Veteran
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
37,340
Reputation
5,485
Daps
108,008
Reppin
LWO/Starkset
SAS is the ultimate company man and boot lick. It took ESPN paying Pat Mcafee double or triple what he makes for him to realize he’s expendable and needs his own platform.

I heard the podcast where he spoke about Jim Trotter and he was soft-shoeing, no doubt about it. SAS is only about getting black folks on as long as they’re not rocking his boat.
VgdR.gif
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
68,335
Reputation
10,564
Daps
230,671
background, Trotter was working for the NFL Network and had pressed Roger Goodell about the lack of diversity in NFL head coaches/front office during the Super Bowl week press conference. His contract wasn't renewed and now he's suing the NFL for discrimination.


Trotter appeared recently on a Slate.com podcast with Jason Johnson. During the conversation, Trotter expressed regret regarding the manner in which some in the media are handling his case.

Trotter mentioned one in particular: ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith.

Here’s the full content of Trotter’s explanation on his point of journalists talking about the case without fully investigating its allegations or understanding the legal principles that support it.

“The biggest disappointment in this whole process for me has been the people who are journalists who speak on my case without actually reading the complaint, or without talking to me first about it,” Trotter told Johnson. “So Stephen A. Smith has the Commissioner on his show, and he asks the Commissioner about my contract not being renewed and the Commissioner says, ‘Oh, it was just a budget cut thing.’ So when that was all over, I texted him. And I said, ‘Man, I saw the interview. I just wish you had called me first to get some background and it would have shown you that what the Commissioner said was untrue.’

“He comes back and says to me, ‘That’s on you. We had been advertising the Commissioner was coming on for a week and a half, and I also spoke to a mutual friend who gave me background on the case.’

“So I had texted him back, and I said — and you know, I’m trying to be cool, because I’m not into this Black man on Black man, you know, crime thing — and I said to him, I said, ‘A lot of assumptions there. But I also thought as journalists we were taught you go directly to the source and not to second-hand information.’

“And now that set him off. I got all caps coming at me, I got exclamation points coming at me and all this other stuff. And he’s telling me how this wasn’t about me, and ESPN is a partner with the NFL, and he didn’t have to ask Roger Goodell that question at all, and this, that, and the other. And so finally I said to him, ‘Well, you can have me on to give my side.’ I said, ‘Your move.’ And he said, again, the exclamation points, ‘That ain’t happening. This wasn’t about you. And I did you a courtesy by even getting the Commissioner to comment on it.’

“So anyway at the end of it I just said, ‘A courtesy, huh?’ I said, ‘Man, I appreciate you.’ And I left it alone.

“And I got to thinking, I’m like, as journalists are we simply seeking a comment, or are we seeking the truth? So don’t sit up here and tell me what a great journalist you are if all you are seeking is a comment, instead of the truth.

“You can disagree with me. You can tell me I’m an idiot for filing the lawsuit. And as you went on your podcast and said, ‘I should have known what was gonna happen.’ And I didn’t even see it, people were texting me about his podcast, where he says he reached out to two Black executives not at the NFL or ESPN and asked them, ‘What would they have done if someone like me had put them on the spot like that publicly?’ And they both said, ‘They would have got my ass up out of there.’

“And what I wanted to say to him, ‘Do you even understand the law?’ Because if either of those individuals had done that to someone, they would be breaking the law. But you’re gonna go ahead and say I should know what could happen? There’s a difference between knowing what could happen and the consequences of those actions. So, to me, that’s the only disappointing thing in this whole process is that I would just ask journalists, if you’re gonna speak on this, I don’t mind you having an opinion — you can tell me I was foolish, whatever you want — all I ask is that you read the complaint, or that if you have questions, you call me. I don’t think that’s too much to ask.”
I will continue to say that this buffoon, Stephen A Smith does not operate as a journalist. A journalist researches and comes in prepared before talking on the subject. He does not.
 
Top