It's obvious the US had something to do with those gas attacks in Syria

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,591
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Been looking for a legit reason to drop bombs and now they magically have one. The Syrian army doesn't need gas to fight rebels. If they were that desperate they would've used something like that a lot sooner. The u.s. has helped prolonged this war by helping the rebels
Syrian Army doesn't need gas to fight rebels.

U.S. needs a reason to bomb though? :laff:
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,836
Daps
156,248
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
Where is your proof?

my proof is history and the manufactured reasons why the u.s. goes to war. its always on some simple shyt. or its some mysterious event. Syria is fighting a civil war with rebels. the government knows the U.S. wants to bomb them and get that regime out of power so they go do the ONE thing what would give the U.S. and excuse to go all out? :mindblown:

so i guess my other proof is common sense :manny:
 

Slaimon Khan Shah

SLAIMON KHAN SHAH = SHAOLIN MONK/S OF ISLAAM
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
15,870
Reputation
2,246
Daps
18,945
Reppin
Denver, Colorado, United States of America
my proof is history and the manufactured reasons why the u.s. goes to war. its always on some simple . or its some mysterious event. Syria is fighting a civil war with rebels. the government knows the U.S. wants to bomb them and get that regime out of power so they go do the ONE thing what would give the U.S. and excuse to go all out?

so i guess my other proof is common sense

Thank you.
 

Tikal

Coming thru like BLAOW
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
1,131
Reputation
390
Daps
2,259
Reppin
:ahh:
The truth is the first thing do die in war. Now, I don't don't know who used the gas but what I find sort of interesting is that people where dying and killing each other before and now that they use another type of weapon to kill each other it's somehow more atrocious. Killing is killing regardless of what you use and just the word chemical weapon is interesting since there is chemicals in most bullets and I remember the Vice short about US bombs/bullets with (I believe) uranium in them.

As for US intervention, I think ground troops is out of the question. The most likely thing we will see is something similar to what happened in Libya.
 

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,616
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,451
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
So you would rather we didnt have an aerospace industry and were defenseless?

Just want to make sure we are on the same page.

no I'm not saying that. I was implying corporations have undue influence on politics. Our big defense contractors want another war to keep the cash flowing in. So the government is involved in Syria to make money for our corporations.

I was being satirical.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
The truth is the first thing do die in war. Now, I don't don't know who used the gas but what I find sort of interesting is that people where dying and killing each other before and now that they use another type of weapon to kill each other it's somehow more atrocious. Killing is killing regardless of what you use and just the word chemical weapon is interesting since there is chemicals in most bullets and I remember the Vice short about US bombs/bullets with (I believe) uranium in them.

As for US intervention, I think ground troops is out of the question. The most likely thing we will see is something similar to what happened in Libya.

Bombing Syria will not be like Libya but a whole other monster and a huge mistake. Sadly the international community watched Black Libyans slaughtered because of lies.
 
Top