Iran Nuclear Deal: USA remains out after failed 2022 JCPOA talks under Biden; U.S. and Iran are in direct talks under Trump

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

How about the state-sponsored bullshyt Israel does to its next door neighbor? .

We're talking about Iran

How about the non-state sponsored bullshyt Pakistan and Saudi Arabia do around the world?

We're talking about Iran though. And the Saudis are on the CIA regime change list if you ask me.

Is it better to work with a populous that you can relate to or a government? I'd argue that making sure the PEOPLE of Iran are on our side is one of the most important things we can do in the Middle East over the long run.

Fair. But the people aren't being represented in the slightest.

That isn't happening if we get into a fight with them over their nuclear program

The people have no control over their nuclear program

 

[Robbie3000]

You ain't busting no guns, we all know you're an armchair warmonger.

- @Napoleon : Murica will prevail, WE coming for ya ass, you renegade country ! :
- Coli : We ? So you'll take up arms too ?
- @Napoleon : There are people who are paid for this shyt.

I can atleast respect the principles of people willing to die for wars. These chicken Hawks are absolute scum.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You ain't busting no guns, we all know you're an armchair warmonger.

- @Napoleon : Murica will prevail, WE coming for ya ass, you renegade country ! :
- Coli : We ? So you'll take up arms too ?
- @Napoleon : There are people who are paid for this shyt.

I can atleast respect the principles of people willing to die for wars. These chicken Hawks are absolute scum.

I don't see the problem here.

I pursue a career in medicine while I appreciate those who have given so much to secure this nation's interest and to tip the scales in our favor at all costs.

Did I miss something?

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Lol yeah getting drawn into another middle east military quagmire with the most technologically-advanced secular nation in the region and the largest Shiite one is in America's best interest.

You're funny because you don't realize how stupid you are.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

fukk going to war. War will only turn their fairly moderate populous into radicals. And then we'll have one more failed state in the Middle East after we demolish their country.

Too bad.

Nukes are non-negotiable.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Lol yeah getting drawn into another middle east military quagmire with the most technologically-advanced secular nation in the region and the largest Shiite one is in America's best interest.

You're funny because you don't realize how stupid you are.

the question was asked what the option was, I said it.

You don't have to like it, however.

Diplomacy won yesterday, but we don't need to rack our brains considering when it didn't.

 

[Billy Hoyle]

We're talking about Iran

We're talking about Iran though. And the Saudis are on the CIA regime change list if you ask me.

Fair. But the people aren't being represented in the slightest.



The people have no control over their nuclear program

The saudis aren't on an American regime change list.

What the fukk do you think will happen to the people if we go to war with them? You think any good at all would come from that? Sure, they don't have a nuke, but now they have a radicalized populous (that tends to happen when you blow up their shyt) and no government.

The absolute last thing we need is another failed state in the Middle East. I'd argue that is way worse for world peace than Iran getting a Nuke.

 

[Billy Hoyle]

Too bad.

Nukes are non-negotiable.

They sure as fukk are negotiable obviously.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

The saudis aren't on an American regime change list.

What the fukk do you think will happen to the people if we go to war with them? You think any good at all would come from that? Sure, they don't have a nuke, but now they have a radicalized populous (that tends to happen when you blow up their shyt) and no government.

The absolute last thing we need is another failed state in the Middle East. I'd argue that is way worse for world peace than Iran getting a Nuke.

I didn't say it was plausible or even likely, but merely that its something I'd love to see happen

 

[No1]

I don't see the problem here.

I pursue a career in medicine while I appreciate those who have given so much to secure this nation's interest and to tip the scales in our favor at all costs.

Did I miss something?

Those who do not have to deal with the personal costs of war should not be so cavalier in sending others to war.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Those who do not have to deal with the personal costs of war should not be so cavalier in sending others to war.

This doesn't address the validity of the use of military force, so keep the beatnik poetry to a minimum

 

[88m3]

You think?

I know for a fact they are.

 

[88m3]

Those who do not have to deal with the personal costs of war should not be so cavalier in sending others to war.

Yes, Lord Chamberlin.



I honestly don't care that the EU has decided to help them build the bomb.

 

[No1]

This doesn't address the validity of the use of military force, so keep the beatnik poetry to a minimum

What does you studying medicine while other people go to war have to do with the validity of the use of military force? You asked what the problem with your position was and I told you. Are you so far up your own ass that you lost track of your own assertions? You truly do enjoy being a deplorable a$$hole to everyone including people (like me) who used to semi-defend you. Keep this up and you know where your ranting ends up.

 

[Robbie3000]

I never had too many issues with at @Napoleon but now I see how he is double title holder and he is doing his best to retain his Worst HL Poster of The Year title.

he is trying his best to go on a Ric Flair type run.