88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
This deal is the most fukked up thing I may have ever witnessed.
Iran has a nuke
This deal is the most fukked up thing I may have ever witnessed.
Iran has a nuke
Thats not true.
Here, on the coli, we are like the UN. The mods are in power.
And they have passed two banner resolutions telling you to eat dikk.
Until you have those two pink WOAT banners removed, you are under sanctions.
Your post have no economic value, and you put at risk others caught doing backroom deals with you and going against the sanctions by giving you daps or rep.
I didn't want to tell you this Napoleon... but I'm afriaid you are a rogue actor.
And one of these days you are gonna think you are in a film thread... but its gonna be a covert op. Cook, Always, Mid-West, Brooklyn, Liu Kang and Walt are gonna SEAL-TEAM 6 your bytchass and release the pics of the ban like they did Bin Laden.
Then we're all gonna celebrate.
Well if they do develop a nuke, then we'll be all up in their shyt while they do it. Just like we'll be with Iran.Do you not realize how this pushes Saudi Arabia to now develop a nuke?
Until every figure here is reduced to zero. No country have any moral nor legal authority to refuse another country the right to nukes.
Until every figure here is reduced to zero. No country have any moral nor legal authority to refuse another country the right to nukes.
They are from 2012 so yes they are around 3 years old. Here's the source : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howard-steven-friedman/countries-with-nuclear-weapons_b_1189632.htmlI think those numbers are out of date /
ISIS is not a country so I don't understand how it breaks my argument. My logic is you have no moral ground to restrain the access to nukes a sovereign country when you're part of the club who have them. If the USA and Europe had no nukes, I'd be all against Iran having it too but who is the USA to tell Iran not to have it ? Is Iran a American state ? So why the hell should they listen ? At some point, leaders need to lead by example.Thats the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Quickest way to break your argument is this: "Ok, lets give ISIS nukes". You think they have the right to nukes? Even if you believe no country should have nukes, guess what, some already do. The goal is to limit that club. Its exclusive for obvious reasons. Nukes = unmatched power. I'm actually ok with Tehran as long as they use it only for power. But theres a catch; Giving Iran nukes just set a precedent in the international community. If you support terrorists(Hezbollah/Hamas), undermine Western interests at all costs, threaten the annihilation of a nation, and take a hard line then you've done enough to warrant having nukes. Clearly, the "powers that be" can't do anything to stop you, so why the fukk not get a nuke. Terrible precedent.
They are from 2012 so yes they are around 3 years old. Here's the source : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howard-steven-friedman/countries-with-nuclear-weapons_b_1189632.html
ISIS is not a country so I don't understand how it breaks my argument. My logic is you have no moral ground to restrain the access to nukes a sovereign country when you're part of the club who have them. If the USA and Europe had no nukes, I'd be all against Iran having it too but who is the USA to tell Iran not to have it ? Is Iran a American state ? So why the hell should they listen ? At some point, leaders need to lead by example.