Type Username Here
Not a new member
My god the zionist and wahhabi tears taste so sweet.
Twitter has been fantastic today.
Twitter has been fantastic today.
I was sharing an experience but I'll indulge you and you can make excuses or whatever.He said name the countries homie. What part didn't u understand?
Um Turkey, 95% of the countries in the Middle East and their populations will be split on sectarian lines that are in favor of Iran, 99%-100% of Muslim counties in Africa depending how desperate Egypt is at the moment to kill its people.
Turkey isn't Middle East, so you can nip your argument in the butt. You don't like answering the question because in reality, you don't talk to Muslims at all.
Turkey isn't Middle East, so you can nip your argument in the butt. You don't like answering the question because in reality, you don't talk to Muslims at all.
There's a comma after Turkey, do you know what the fukk that even means?
Turkey is the link for the European connection to the Middle East. Their politics greatly effect the stability of the Middle East.
Yes because of it's ties to many Muslim nations in the Middle East. That's it. Nothing more.
So a country that has ties to many Muslim nations in the Middle East is irrelevant in a discussion on politics in a Middle Eastern country like Iran. Gotcha.
Then in that case you might as well bring up Russia, China, France, etc
The original discussion clearly centered around countries in the region
The US failed to establish a friendly regime in post-Saddam Iraq, because the Iranians seized on a historic opportunity to not only block the formation of a strong Iraqi state - one that has always in the past been a threat to them and thus functioned as a counter-balance in terms of US foreign policy - but to also expand their power in the region. (A big indicator will be whether Assad stays in power in Syria which would in effect maintain Iran's momentum.) Facing pressure from within and a Russian resurgence, the US is backtracking. There may be some sabre rattling from both sides, but trust that it's all theater.
Both sides made their stand. Iran earlier this year with military exercises in the Strait of Hormuz, and the US with their naval carrier movement. But nobody is interested in crossing the line as the risks are too great. Ultimately the US really only wants a guaranteed flow of oil, while Iran's objective is to eliminate threats to their regime and to have greater control over how Middle Eastern oil revenues are distributed. I believe that after the election in November, a deal will be brokered that entails mutual accommodation and face-saving in front of their respective constituencies. This is the logical conlusion to draw from the facts on the ground and the actions of all the players.
So a country that has ties to many Muslim nations in the Middle East is irrelevant in a discussion on politics in a Middle Eastern country like Iran. Gotcha.
Wow you may be more retarded than I previously thought...
https://maps.google.com/maps?client=safari&oe=UTF-8&q=map of middle east&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x157ec4658142ffb7:0xa5b8320215ea72c,Middle East&gl=us&ei=EH6SUuHbE-yhsATwiYC4Bg&ved=0CCwQ8gEwAA
Yes... you have never talked to any Muslim person because your dumb ass can't name a fukking country from the middle east.
Yes, as in you know what it means when someone uses a comma?
http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/commas.asp
Yup, didn't grow up in NYC, haven't traveled extensively, haven't lived in a Muslim country.
Your reading comprehension and grammar are just...