Iran helped 9/11, using the Saudis as proxies. Look at the facts. - US Treasury agrees

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@GSR @Jatt @Matt504 @FAH1223 @the cac mamba @MansaMusa @ZoeGod @Domingo Halliburton @BaggerofTea @DonKnock @Deutsche Bank @newworldafro @Ill @thekingsmen @Reality @Czarface @Swagnificent @Thomas @Robbie3000 @red222 @TheRealfG @88m3










Bin Laden’s Men in Tehran… Iran Heavily Indebted to Al-Qaeda

ASHARQ AL-AWSATJanuary 4, 2016, 12:18 pm 1702

Bin Laden’s Men

The relationship between Iran and the leaders of Al-Qaeda dates back to years ago and was reinforced after the 9/11 events in 2001. However, documents found by US forces after the founder of the organization of Osama bin Laden was killed in his hideout in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in 2011, revealed further than that, as these documents highlighted that the organization was moving comfortably inside Iran.

Over the years, the reasons why the Iranian regime had its arms open to «Al-Qaeda» leaders remained a part of the puzzling mysteries of the political game, even for specialists in Iranian affairs. From the military official of the organization Saif al-Adel, to Bin Laden’s daughter husband Suleiman Abu Ghaith, Saad Bin Laden, al-Qaeda advisor Abu al-Walid al-Masri, Abu Hafs al-Mauritani, Abu Laith al-Libi and the alleged mastermind of the bombing of US embassies in east Africa in 1998 Abu Mohammed al-Masri, dozens of leaders of the organization have lived under the protection of the «Revolutionary Guards» in Tehran and other Iranian cities.

Iran has sought to keep Al Qaeda’s card and use in time of need; a theory which is considered validated for some people. But in 2014, something came out to expose the dark side in Tehran’s relations with «al-Qaeda» men. On 11 May of that year, a website linked to IS posted a voice message of the official spokesman for the organization, Abu Muhammad al-Adnani entitled «Apologies Amir al-Qaeda », during which al-Adnani attacked Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri, who is Bin Laden’s replacement. The charges needed no interpretation because part of the message carried the title of “Iran’s Heavy Debt to Al-Qaeda”.

In the recording, al-Adnani admitted that IS did not target Iran at the quest of al-Qaeda to preserve its (al-Qaeda’s) interests and logistics.

“ISIS followed the guidance of al-Jihad sheikhs and symbols, so it did not strike the Shiites in Iran since its inception, and left Raafidis safe in Iran. It reined back its infuriated soldiers despite their ability, at the time, to fill Iran with pools of blood. It swallowed its anger all these years bearing accusations of treachery for not targeting its worst enemies, leaving the Raafidis enjoying security pursuant to Al Qaeda’s order to maintain its interests and lines of supply in Iran », al-Adnani said.

 

[newworldafro]

OP wants to literally attack every ME country, with no qualms .......
Either he can't distinguish when he's being sheeple herded mentally or he's the Son of

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

OP wants to literally attack every ME country, with no qualms .......
Either he can't distinguish when he's being sheeple herded mentally or he's the Son of

Who said anything about attacking anything?

I'm sharing information.

And 99% of you had no idea Iran collaborated with Al Qaeda in the last 20 years.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

OP needs a crash course on Iran

 

[Deutsche Bank]

So Dear Leader is either grossly incompetent or complicit, then.



























Trump 2016

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

OP needs a crash course on Iran

I know all about this.

Word to Kermit Roosevelt Jr.

What's that change about Iran having an agreement with Al-Qaeda?

Oh, and PressTV is Iranian State TV, FYI.

 

[damn_ese]

you forgot to highlight this tidbit from the 9/11 commission

“found no evidence that Iran or Hezbollah was aware of the planning for what later became the 9/11 attack,” and that the “topic requires further investigation by the U.S. government.”

i wouldn't consider that concrete evidence, and as far as the Jerusalem Post, its a known heavily right wing paper and even then they took the fact that a judge had ruled in favor of some families suing Iran as the end all be all ,case closed, judgement on Iranian involvement.

In fact, how is it possible that a LEBANESE man named Ali Al-Jarrah was a CONFIRMED spy for Israel going back to 1983 and was found to even have helped coordinate the assassination of Syrian general Mohammed Suleiman (CONFIRMED BY SNOWDENS LEAKS, BTW) yet have a COUSIN named ZIAD Al JARRAH...a fukking HIJACKER ON FLIGHT 93?! Your cousin, when you have connections to Hezbollah ends up Flight 93 and you are one of Israels' most vital double agents...and you know nothing about it? Either The West is getting played by Iran, this guy played Israel, or he knew about his Cousin's role in 9/11....ain't no way he didn't know ZIAD's involvement. The US Government held this information until it was forced to reveal it in court.

did you even read these parts, he was an israeli agent, so . . wouldnt Israel know about this and snitch to the U.S.?

their key witness was Abolghassem Mesbahi this dude defected back in 1996, how the hell did he even have the connections at the highest levels of Iranian intelligence to even be privy to the 9/11 plot after A) defecting, and B) being out of the loop since 96. besides there is speculation that he was a double agent. workin for the U.S.

If Iran did help the hijackers by letting them travel through Iran into Afghanistan, it could be anyones guess why. it could be that Iran was palyed also, who knows if the hijackers were telling Iran "nah you good! we gonna run up on Israel! thats our enemy"

and if the U.S. really was sitting on some smoking gun proof that Iran was a major force behind the plot, why not use it against them, shyt in the mid 2000s, bush had just invaded Iraq and was just waiting for Iran to sneeze the wrong way in order to have an excuse to invade. and they not gonna use this supposed evidence as an excuse?

basically your arguments are weak as hell. bring me some concrete evidence, something that really is evidence that Iran helped plan the attacks. Khalid Shiek Mohammed would have said it

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

you forgot to highlight this tidbit from the 9/11 commission

“found no evidence that Iran or Hezbollah was aware of the planning for what later became the 9/11 attack,” and that the “topic requires further investigation by the U.S. government.”

i wouldn't consider that concrete evidence, and as far as the Jerusalem Post, its a known heavily right wing paper and even then they took the fact that a judge had ruled in favor of some families suing Iran as the end all be all case closed judgement on Iranian involvement.


did you even read these parts, he was an israeli agent, so . . wouldnt Israel know about this and snitch to the U.S.?

their key witness was Abolghassem Mesbahi this dude defected back in 1996, how the hell did he even have the connections at the highest levels of Iranian intelligence to even be privy to the 9/11 plot after A) defecting, and B) being out of the loop since 96. besides there is speculation that he was a double agent. workin for the U.S.

If Iran did help the hijackers by letting them travel through Iran into Afghanistan, it could be anyones guess why. it could be that Iran was palyed also, who knows if the hijackers were telling Iran "nah you good! we gonna run up on Israel! thats our enemy"

and if the U.S. really was sitting on some smoking gun proof that Iran was a major force behind the plot, why not use it against them, shyt in the mid 2000s, bush was had just invaded Iraq and just waiting for Iran to sneeze the wrong way in order to have an excuse to invade. and they not gonna use this supposed evidence as an excuse?

basically your arguments are weak as hell. bring me some concrete evidence, something that really is evidence that Iran helped plan the attacks. Khalid Shiek Mohammed would have said it

For fukks sakes, the Brookings Institute wrote about this:




Unlikely Alliance: Iran's Secretive Relationship with Al-Qaeda

Download » (PDF)

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@zamzon

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

I know all about this.

Word to Kermit Roosevelt Jr.

What's that change about Iran having an agreement with Al-Qaeda?

Oh, and PressTV is Iranian State TV, FYI.

So if Iran hates the gulf Arabs and the gulf Arabs are funding and supporting IS and AQ why would they help them...what could they gain?

if anything Iran had been sitting back enjoying the horror show until it came too close to their back yard now theyre concerned

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

So if Iran hates the gulf Arabs and the gulf Arabs are funding and supporting IS and AQ why would they help them...what could they gain?

if anything Iran had been sitting back enjoying the horror show until it came too close to their back yard now theyre concerned

Iran uses Al-Qaeda like Pakistan uses the Taliban.

Its anything they cause use on a leash against the West.

Widen your horizons here.

The soviets used to do the same shyt.

 

[damn_ese]

-Iran sometimes supports Al-Qaeda in Iraq (which appeared after the 2003 invasion) they probably did have some kind of dealings with Al-Qaeda back in the early 90s, but doesnt prove they knew what was being planned much less proves that they helped finance and plan it

-the article says Al-Qaeda and Iran have very distrustful, difficult dealings, they hate each other at the end of the day, so why would Al-Qaeda let Iran in on the secret 9/11 plot?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

-Iran sometimes supports Al-Qaeda in Iraq (which appeared after the 2003 invasion) they probably did have some kind of dealings with Al-Qaeda back in the early 90s, but doesnt prove they knew what was being planned much less proves that they helped finance and plan it

-the article says Al-Qaeda and Iran have very distrustful, difficult dealings, they hate each other at the end of the day, so why would Al-Qaeda let Iran in on the secret 9/11 plot?

1. The US claims to have inside knowledge, probably classified intel, suggesting that Iran facilitated actions that led to 9/11. Probably? Bruh, most of the insurgency was inspired by Iran.

2. Their relationship is fraught, but they still have one. Look at Pakistan and the Taliban. And Iran via Mughniyeh and Al-Qaeda via Bin Laden have had a partnership that facilitated the transmission of material, personnel, and funding. Mughniyeh was meeting with hijackers man. Don't ignore this.

Remember KSA rejected Bin Laden outside of radical elements within the country itself.

 

[damn_ese]

1. The US claims to have inside knowledge, probably classified intel, suggesting that Iran facilitated actions that led to 9/11. Probably? Bruh, most of the insurgency was inspired by Iran.

2. Their relationship is fraught, but they still have one. Look at Pakistan and the Taliban. And Iran via Mughniyeh and Al-Qaeda via Bin Laden have had a partnership that facilitated the transmission of material, personnel, and funding. Mughniyeh was meeting with hijackers man. Don't ignore this.

Remember KSA rejected Bin Laden outside of radical elements within the country itself.

1) if they have actual evidence why not use it? Bush and his cabinet would have used that type of evidence in a heart beat! back then everyone thought Iran was next to get invaded. Iran definitely helped the shiites in the south and east, and possibly helped the sunnis also, but to say that they were the sole reason for the insurgency is a very uninformed statement.

2) the only real mention of Mughniyeh meeting with the hijackers is from the Suit brought against Iran. unless there are other corroborating sources.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

1) if they have actual evidence why not use it? Bush and his cabinet would have used that type of evidence in a heart beat! back then everyone thought Iran was next to get invaded. Iran definitely helped the shiites in the south and east, and possibly helped the sunnis also, but to say that they were the sole reason for the insurgency is a very uninformed statement.

2) the only real mention of Mughniyeh meeting with the hijackers is from the Suit brought against Iran. unless there are other corroborating sources.

Bro. Read this:

And no...Iran is not Iraq. Iraq was easy. iran is the strongest country in the region. Arguably more than Israel.