Hold on brehs.
Regardless of your feelings towards Nap, reading through the thread brehs aren't doing a good job of responding to the actual facts presented.
I agree that the dynamics of this overall don't make sense (Why would Republicans & hawks not jump all over this opportunity to strike at Iran? Why would Iran poke the US and help enable their chief rival in the region?)
But...how do we explain this:
Iran Told to Pay $10.5 Billion to Sept. 11 Kin, Insurers
Is a "default judgment" just what happens when one party in a trial doesn't play ball (like no contest by default?), or is the judge in this case actually making a judgment?
Some of the other facts
@ThreeLetterAgency presents are also compelling...