Iran helped 9/11, using the Saudis as proxies. Look at the facts. - US Treasury agrees

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,311
Reppin
The Deep State
And if this is true how come this didn't came up during the nuclear discussion? If this was true conservative right nut jobs would have screamed about this. Israel and Saudi Arabia would have brought this up. Saudi Arabia bears some responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. If Iran was connected there would have calls for war against Iran. There was members in the Bush white house who said "Anybody can go to Baghdad but real men go to Tehran."
The US Govt said the nuclear discussion was tabling all other issues. Not even prisoners and spies were on the table. It was a huge talking point. How did you ignore this?

And no one is ignoring the KSA connection. I'm not. I'm not removing that.

I'm expanding your circle of reasoning to include intelligence agencies in Iran.

Bro. Just take what i'm saying, and read into it.

Prove me wrong. Thats the best way to investigate what i'm saying.
 

ZoeGod

I’m from Brooklyn a place where stars are born.
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
9,170
Reputation
4,610
Daps
52,668
Reppin
Brooklyn,NY
You must think Sunnis and shias can't ever work together...they do.

...When the West is the target

Understand that, before you understand anything else.

If that was the case there would have been no sectarian civil war in Iraq when the US occupied the country. You would have sunni and Shia militants working together to kill American soldiers instead of slaughtering each other. You would have Saudi Arabia backing Hezbollah in their war against Israel.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,311
Reppin
The Deep State
If that was the case there would have been no sectarian civil war in Iraq when the US occupied the country. You would have sunni and Shia militants working together to kill American soldiers instead of slaughtering each other. You would have Saudi Arabia backing Hezbollah in their war against Israel.
What do you think the insurgency was???

Hell, its documented most of the IEDs that came into Iraq were Iranian in origin.

WIKILEAKS proved this

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/23/world/middleeast/23iran.html?pagewanted=all

Weapons prove Iranian role in Iraq, U.S. says

How Many US Troops Were Killed By Iranian IEDs in Iraq?

www.militarytimes.com/story/military/capitol-hill/2015/07/14/iran-linked-to-deaths-of-500-us-troops-in-iraq-afghanistan/30131097/
 

DonKnock

KPJ Gonna Save Us
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
27,156
Reputation
7,840
Daps
88,730
Reppin
Houston
Half of that article points the finger at how Saudi is guilty of all the things that people allege of them


But OP concludes that Saudi is after all innocent:mjlol:
 

DonKnock

KPJ Gonna Save Us
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
27,156
Reputation
7,840
Daps
88,730
Reppin
Houston
Why did Imad Mughniyeh meet with the Saudi Hijackers and facilitate their relocation into the USA?

Its been confirmed that the "senior iranian official" mentioned in the 9/11 report WAS Mughniyeh. This shyt is very blatant to me.

Breh read between the lines. Its spelled out.

Higher ups in Iran funded wayward Al-Qaeda radicals that the KSA doesn't even like because radicals are themselves a thread to the KSA.


Because the US wanted them there:heh:
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-145
Daps
65,106
Reppin
NULL
The same way they had nothing to gain from the Khobar Towers? :sas1:

:mjlol: If Iran did 9/11 why did the Bush Admin go to Afghanistan and Iraq for? Why not attack Iran?

1. No Proof
2. Both places don't have armies.
3. 9/11 commission tried so hard to cover it up
4. Silverstein already had blueprints for the new tower in 2000.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,311
Reppin
The Deep State
:mjlol: If Iran did 9/11 why did the Bush Admin go to Afghanistan and Iraq for? Why not attack Iran?

1. No Proof
2. Both places don't have armies.
3. 9/11 commission tried so hard to cover it up
4. Silverstein already had blueprints for the new tower in 2000.
You're thinking too small. You can't just attack Iran.

1. Afghanistan was base to the Taliban. They had to go.

2. Iran has a huge army. Don't be an idiot

3. The 9/11 commission didn't want to ruin the saudi relationship

4. Who cares? Real estate developers do shyt like that.
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
18,901
Reputation
4,518
Daps
80,721
Reppin
The Arsenal
bunk-the-wire.gif
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-145
Daps
65,106
Reppin
NULL
You're thinking too small. You can't just attack Iran.

1. Afghanistan was base to the Taliban. They had to go.

2. Iran has a huge army. Don't be an idiot

3. The 9/11 commission didn't want to ruin the saudi relationship

4. Who cares? Real estate developers do shyt like that.

1. Taliban has nothing to do with AL-Q. The HQ of AL-Q was in S.A.
2. I never said Iran didn't have a huge army....:beli:

3. So blaming Iran would ruin Saudi relationship..........:mjlol:. Somehow that never happened since 1953 til the 1980's, US was going Ham on Iran and Iran fought back.

4. :francis: The man bought towers months in and decides he wants to make them disappear and reappear. Somehow the 19 hijackers knew of Silverstein's plan and he insured it weeks before the attack.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,311
Reppin
The Deep State
1. Taliban has nothing to do with AL-Q. The HQ of AL-Q was in S.A.
This is false.


2. I never said Iran didn't have a huge army....:beli:
Except you did.

3. So blaming Iran would ruin Saudi relationship..........:mjlol:. Somehow that never happened since 1953 til the 1980's, US was going Ham on Iran and Iran fought back.
The iran connection exposes the fact that KSA doesn't have its house in order if Iran is using Sunni proxies to engage in fukkery. It would cause further instability in the Kingdom

Read between the lines.


4. :francis: The man bought towers months in and decides he wants to make them disappear and reappear. Somehow the 19 hijackers knew of Silverstein's plan and he insured it weeks before the attack.
Here is your link to Iran:

Ziad Jarrah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,311
Reppin
The Deep State
Half of that article points the finger at how Saudi is guilty of all the things that people allege of them


But OP concludes that Saudi is after all innocent:mjlol:
I never said Saudi Arabia was innocent. Or rather that the government itself is innocent, but extremist rogue members of the royal family were complicit.
 
Top