Interesting Analogy (Double Standards in Race & Sexuality)

Seedz

Hate White People
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
2,054
Reputation
10
Daps
3,026
Reppin
NULL
Lots of females feel that there is a double standard between men & women in terms of whoredom.

For example: A man can fucc as many womans as he please and not be looked down upon in our society. However, if a woman does the same she is labeled as a hoe.

"To my N****s, having biitches is what you just do, to my biitches having N****s is what a slut do".

In my opinion, most females call out DOUBLE STANDARD, not because they don't want men fuccing multiple women, but more-so because they would like to do it as well. So it's not that they have a problem with men doing it, they just want to do it and be accepted.

I came to this conclusion only because I've come to realize that non-slutty womens do not care what 'slutty' men are doing, they'd rather just find a non-'slutty' man, instead of complain about the ones fuccing every ho in the club.

..................


So that's when I thought of this analogy:

The above stated women, who complain about the double standard, are similar to white people who complain about black people using the n-word.

How you ask? Okay I shall explain.

White people who complain about black people using the N-word do not care that they are using it, they just care that they are not allowed to use it as well. Its a jealousy thing. Same as girls who cry about the double standard sexually... truly they have no problem with guys fuccing whoever, they just want to be able to do so themselves.

:whew:

^most typing I've ever done on here.

Discuss.

EDIT: Thread was inspired by Ab-Soul: Double Standards (as well as alcohol)
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,191
Reputation
3,419
Daps
95,481


I came to this conclusion only because I've come to realize that non-slutty womens do not care what 'slutty' men are doing, they'd rather just find a non-'slutty' man, instead of complain about the ones fuccing every ho in the club.

True. :ehh:
 

Seedz

Hate White People
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
2,054
Reputation
10
Daps
3,026
Reppin
NULL
I know somebody gonna try to disprove my hypothesis. Unfortunately its a bunch of reactionary/lurker type posters in here at the moment. We need a leader to start it off the other side of this debate.
 

Illuminatos

#OVOXO
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
42,947
Reputation
470
Daps
176,749
Reppin
NULL
DIDN'T READ LOL!!!!!!! :lolhov::lolhov::lolhov: :lolhov::lolhov::lolhov::lolhov::lolhov::lolhov:
 

WaveCapsByOscorp™

2021 Grammy Award Winner
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,971
Reputation
-446
Daps
45,110
how did you come up with your opinion about women only calling it a double standard because they want to not be labeled? i mean, regardless of why they feel a need to call it a double standard, it still is one. also the opinion that non slutty women only care about what non slutty men are doing, where did you come up with that? i also think your analogy is bad too. it assumes a lot about others just because they say something's wrong. i think when people mention how something's a double standard, they're illuminating the hypocrisy of someone's actions. it's a jump to assume that because they bring attention to hypocritical actions all so they can do some too.
 

FijiWatr

Rookie
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
344
Reputation
0
Daps
192
berneydidnotread.gif
 

Trey0'5Blue2Gz

I'm The Cook that killed Gus Fring
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
10,031
Reputation
2,771
Daps
39,277
Reppin
Liberty City
how did you come up with your opinion about women only calling it a double standard because they want to not be labeled? i mean, regardless of why they feel a need to call it a double standard, it still is one. also the opinion that non slutty women only care about what non slutty men are doing, where did you come up with that? i also think your analogy is bad too. it assumes a lot about others just because they say something's wrong. i think when people mention how something's a double standard, they're illuminating the hypocrisy of someone's actions. it's a jump to assume that because they bring attention to hypocritical actions all so they can do some too.

I actually think his analogy is on point! I've met plenty of women like that who admit that beside it being hypocritical the most upsetting part of it all is that they can't have sex with just every guy like that with out being labeled a hoe. Most women like and think of sex as much as men so it's not far fetched to even think what OP said is true. Like I said his analogy was on point; white people argue the fact that we can say nikka but others can't because they want to use it freely but know they can't because they can be labeled racist, a bigiot, ignorant etc. They don't argue for the sake to stop the usage of the word but rather argue for the very use of it. Just like women who complain about men being able to sleep around, the one's who complain about it want to partake in it not stop it.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,826
Daps
84,257
Reppin
NULL
Its biological.

Men are genetically programmed to be more promiscuous. Our bodies produce millions of sperm each day. Because we produce so much, our genes don't really care what we do with them. We aren't really programmed to want to search out for that one mate to put our seed in. If we only produced one sperm a month, as we see in women, then evolution would've made us alot more conscious about where we put our dikks. But since we have so much sperm, evolution has programmed us to wanna fukk as many bytches as possible to spread our seed. And since child rearing isn't on us, we don't care if we end up fukking more bytches than we can provide for.

Women on the other hand, produce only one egg a month before menopause. Thus, evolution has made them alot more conscious about who they allow in their vagina. And because they are the ones who are saddled with pregnancy, childbirth, and child rearing, they also care more about whether the person they let into their vagina can provide for the child and her after birth. Imagine how difficult it would've been for a woman 100,000 years ago in the African Savannah to take care of herself while being pregnant and after child birth with a young baby at hand. How many predators could a lone female protect herself against. How would she provide for herself while pregnant and her child after birth? That is why women go more for the provider when seeking a mate rather than men who go almost exclusively for looks. The woman is genetically programmed to seek out a mate who can provide for her and her child because that was how our species evolved.

But women aren't without sin. During ovulation, when the egg is ready for impregnation, women become more promiscuous. For example, lets say the woman chooses to pair bond with a mate who is a great provider but might not be the most genetically fit (aka attractive). During ovulation this woman is more prone to seek out a sexual mate who will provide better genes (aka more attractive) but will end up coming back home to the provider to have him raise another man's children. Women have this base instinct about when the egg is ready for impregnation and during that period they become more promiscuous and more likely to cheat. During the rest of the month when she isn't ovulating, she'll have no problem taking dikk from the non-attractive provider knowing that his seed isn't gonna produce a child.

This is why in approximately 10% of marriages the kids are illegitimate, and you have many men raising children that are some other man's kids genetically. The same phenomenon is seen throughout the animal kingdom.

When folks say this is a battle of the sexes, they ain't lying. Evolution has programmed us to have very different interests when it comes to sex. You married nikkas better watch your bytches. They are genetically programmed to creep on you when they are ready to bear a child and will have you raising some other nikkas kids.
 

Seedz

Hate White People
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
2,054
Reputation
10
Daps
3,026
Reppin
NULL
I actually think his analogy is on point! I've met plenty of women like that who admit that beside it being hypocritical the most upsetting part of it all is that they can't have sex with just every guy like that with out being labeled a hoe. Most women like and think of sex as much as men so it's not far fetched to even think what OP said is true. Like I said his analogy was on point; white people argue the fact that we can say nikka but others can't because they want to use it freely but know they can't because they can be labeled racist, a bigiot, ignorant etc. They don't argue for the sake to stop the usage of the word but rather argue for the very use of it. Just like women who complain about men being able to sleep around, the one's who complain about it want to partake in it not stop it.

Someone gets it.
 
Top