Instagram seeks right to sell access to photos to advertisers

[thernbroom]

Facebook's photo-sharing site Instagram has updated its privacy policy giving it the right to sell users' photos to advertisers without notification.

Unless users delete their Instagram accounts by a deadline of 16 January, they cannot opt out.

The changes also mean Instagram can share information about its users with Facebook, its parent company, as well as other affiliates and advertisers.

The move riled social media users, with one likening it to a "suicide note".

The new policies follow Facebook's record $1bn (£616m; 758 euro) acquisition of Instagram in April.

Facebook's vice-president of global marketing solutions Carolyn Everson earlier this month had said: "Eventually we'll figure out a way to monetise Instagram."

A notice updating the privacy policy on the Instagram site said: "We may share your information as well as information from tools like cookies, log files, and device identifiers and location data with organisations that help us provide the service to you... (and) third-party advertising partners."

"To help us deliver interesting paid or sponsored content or promotions, you agree that a business may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you," it said in its terms of use.

But Instagram said that its aim was to make it easier to work with Facebook.

"This means we can do things like fight spam more effectively, detect system and reliability problems more quickly, and build better features for everyone by understanding how Instagram is used," it said in a statement.

'Suicide note'
However, the updated policy will not change how it handles photo ownership or who is able to see a user's pictures, it added.

But the new policy has triggered a backlash among social media users, with some threatening to quit.

One user tweeted: "Good bye #instagram. Your new terms of service are totally stupid and nonsense. Good luck playing with the big boys."

New York-based photographer Clayton Cubbit wrote on his account that the new policy was "Instagram's suicide note".

Analysts said that the new policies could deal a blow to Facebook's reputation and alienate some users.

Richard Holway, chairman of TechMarketView, said: "Every time Facebook has altered their privacy policy it has led to a backlash and they've been forced to retreat. They tamper with people's privacy at a cost. People are very upset."

Alan Pelz-Sharpe, research director at 451 Research, added: "It's a barefaced tactic that Facebook and Instagram have taken, and one that will likely meet with many challenges, legally and ethically.

"The fact is that Facebook has critical mass, and is quite confident that such moves may cause uproar, but not a flight of business.

"Larger firms like Facebook are essentially trailblazing before specific regulations can catch up with them, and as we have seen with Google in the past, regulations and laws have limited real impact on their business operations - so they tend to move forward regardless of opposition."

 

[Liquid]

I never used it and I am always a step closer to closing my facebook account for good

 

[diggy]

I never used it and I am always a step closer to closing my facebook account for good

I have one, I loved it, now FB has officially ruined it, bout to close shop on both

 

[qwerty_jones]

Facebook needs competition. I would like to see a non profit company get it on social networking. Get Social

The best of FB, Instagram, Foursquare etc jam packed into a non profit site, no ads.

 

[CoolazzFemale]

Seriously thinking of closing FB. Or at least taking my 3 photos down.

 

[Lil Bape the PostGod]

motivation to take more epic pics in hopes of being a poster child for a las vegas hotel or somethin

 

[ExodusNirvana]

I warned people that the novelty of Instagram would wear off

 

[MikelArteta]

Deleted my fb months ago
Never signed up for instagram

Enjoy your Mug posted somewhere without getting paid for it

 

[nalej]

way to ruin a great thing FB.

 

[Data-Hawk]

way to ruin a great thing FB.

i dont even think its FB. instagram needs a way to make money.

 

[nalej]

i dont even think its FB. instagram needs a way to make money.

FB owns instagram so yes it's FB.

 

[The Jewnited States]

facebook be the devil yo

 

[Lil Bape the PostGod]

they wont just be taking random peoples pics they take in front of their mirror...they'll use actual good quality pictures that are tagged at like business locations and shyt....this doesnt effect me, or most people at all..

 

[nalej]

they wont just be taking random peoples pics they take in front of their mirror...they'll use actual good quality pictures that are tagged at like business locations and shyt....this doesnt effect me, or most people at all..

and one day you look up at a billboard and your face is on it advertising sextoys

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

I wonder what all the losers that swore by Instagram being the premier app for iOS and Android will do now?

Thank God this filth hasn't sullied the Windows Phone store yet...