Income Inequality: Why the Economy Is Not Right for All Americans

saturn7

Politics is an EXCHANGE!!!
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
12,012
Reputation
2,710
Daps
58,507
Reppin
DMV Freedman
Income Inequality: Why the Economy Is Not Right for All Americans

Apr.08 -- Peter Georgescu, chairman emeritus at Young & Rubicam and author of "Capitalists Arise!," and Torsten Slok, chief international economist at Deutsche Bank, discuss the challenges presented by income inequality and the depth of the problem in the United States. They speak on "Bloomberg Daybreak: Americas."

 

Ya' Cousin Cleon

OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
24,285
Reputation
-1,585
Daps
81,997
Reppin
Harvey World to Dallas, TX
People are losing faith in capitalism. The world needs a new approach

Surveys suggest that a growing number of people are losing faith in capitalism and the free market system, convinced they are being — or will be — cast off as detritus in the wake of globalization and advancing technology.
These sentiments are helping to fuel political polarization and populism in the United States, Europe and elsewhere.
Last year, a Gallup survey found that only 45% of young adults in the United States have a favorable view of capitalism, while 51% see socialism in a positive light. Among all US adults, only 56% gave capitalism a positive rating, the lowest since 2010.
If we are to restore their faith in capitalism and free markets, we must find ways to ensure that the rewards extend to far more people in the United States and around the world. Achieving that will require candid dialogue and close collaboration between government and business.

The challenge is complex. Social and economic disruptions, including income disparity, a shrinking middle class, the uneven distribution of the benefits of globalization, and the threat of job loss due to automation all contribute to the declining confidence in our economic system. Studies indicate that young people in both developed and developing countries can no longer assume that they will have a higher standard of living than their parents.

In the United States, 90% of Americans born in 1940 earned more than their parents by age 30, compared with only half of those born in the 1980s, according to Harvard's Opportunity Insights group. Diminishing mobility isn't just an American problem. The World Bank reports that intergenerational mobility is slowing around the globe as opportunities for better education and higher-paying jobs fade.
There is an imperative for us to bridge the polarization that has stalled our national discourse. We must bring together people from diverse backgrounds to collaborate and seek solutions rather than reiterate their standard talking points.

Many corporate executives believe — as I did when I was president of a publicly traded company — that their primary objective is to maximize quarterly profits. But as I have come to realize, the best way to serve shareholders over the long term is to recognize and adjust to a changing world. And what the world urgently requires of capitalism's proponents is that we find ways to leverage the system to create better opportunities for more people.
When the free market system functions as designed, it can drive solutions to alleviate suffering and lift individuals to their fullest potential. For example, we can witness the dramatic transformations underway in China and Vietnam.


The challenge isn't that we simply make a better case for the free market system. The most persuasive argument will fall on deaf ears unless real change accompanies our words. Only then will we replace today's skepticism with renewed confidence.



best summed up by whoever said "they say how great the economy is, but 79 percent of people are living paycheck to paycheck"

is the cost of living really just that fukked up :why:
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
39,852
Reputation
20,309
Daps
125,757
How much more should someone highly skilled be allowed to make than someone unskilled? and how did you settle on whatever amount you decide?

How skilled should you be before you can make a living wage? Let's assume a living wage is defined as being able to afford to support a wife, 1 child, and a mortgage.

So you don't disagree with the numbers?
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,849
Reputation
4,391
Daps
88,913
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
How skilled should you be before you can make a living wage? Let's assume a living wage is defined as being able to afford to support a wife, 1 child, and a mortgage.

So you don't disagree with the numbers?
I believe the market should decide...:manny: or to put it another way, as much as they can negotiate for.
I feel this way all the way up the latter. If a CEO can negotiate a trillion dollar salary, good for him.


But what's an acceptable amount of inequality to liberals? how is it decided? and by whom?
Surely no one thinks surgeons should be paid the exact same as fast food workers...
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,444
Reputation
6,865
Daps
144,965
Reppin
CookoutGang
I believe the market should decide...:manny: or to put it another way, as much as they can negotiate for.
I feel this way all the way up the latter. If a CEO can negotiate a trillion dollar salary, good for him.


But what's an acceptable amount of inequality to liberals? how is it decided? and by whom?
Surely no one thinks surgeons should be paid the exact same as fast food workers...
You're operating under the assumption that the CEO is the most skilled worker. :skip:
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,849
Reputation
4,391
Daps
88,913
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
You're operating under the assumption that the CEO is the most skilled worker. :skip:
I believe the CEO position requires a certain skillset of its own, and that the CEO possess those skills. If he doesn't he wont be CEO for long.


:sas1:what's an acceptable amount of inequality to liberals? how is it decided? and by whom?
No one wants to answer that huh?


 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,444
Reputation
6,865
Daps
144,965
Reppin
CookoutGang
I believe the CEO position requires a certain skillset of its own, and that the CEO possess those skills. If he doesn't he wont be CEO for long.


:sas1:what's an acceptable amount of inequality to liberals? how is it decided? and by whom?
No one wants to answer that huh?

There are plenty of people who can fill that role, there's just one role. :manny:
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,444
Reputation
6,865
Daps
144,965
Reppin
CookoutGang
*Kanye voice* "there's a thousand you there's only one of me"


What does that have to do with the pay though?:ld:
You said it was based on skills, but scarcity doesn't particularly lead to having the highest skilled worker. At least not in the case of execs.

CEOs fail often. :pachaha:
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,849
Reputation
4,391
Daps
88,913
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
You said it was based on skills, but scarcity doesn't particularly lead to having the highest skilled worker. At least not in the case of execs.
:picard:

I believe the market should decide...or to put it another way, as much as they can negotiate for.
I feel this way all the way up the latter. If a CEO can negotiate a trillion dollar salary, good for him.
I believe the CEO position requires a certain skillset of its own, and that the CEO possess those skills. If he doesn't he wont be CEO for long.
 
Top