If you could do it over, what legislation would you change?

Which piece of legislation would you rewrite?

  • Bank Bailout - Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

    Votes: 3 21.4%
  • Auto Bailout - (TARP Funds)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Stimulus Package - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

    Votes: 3 21.4%
  • Health Care Act - PPACA

    Votes: 2 14.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 6 42.9%

  • Total voters
    14

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,338
Reputation
6,850
Daps
90,883
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (Division A of Pub.L. 110–343, 122 Stat.3765, enacted October 3, 2008), commonly referred to as a bailout of the U.S. financial system, is a law enacted in response to the subprime mortgage crisis authorizing the United States Secretary of the Treasury to spend up to $700 billion to purchase distressed assets, especiallymortgage-backed securities, and supply cash directly to banks. The funds for purchase of distressed assets were mostly redirected to inject capital into banks and other financial institutions while the Treasury continued to examine the usefulness of targeted asset purchases.[1][2] Both foreign and domestic banks are included in the program. The Federal Reserve also extended help to American Express, whose bank-holding application it recently approved.[3] The Act was proposed by Treasury SecretaryHenry Paulson during the global financial crisis of 2008.

The emergency bailout of General Motors and Chrysler announced by President Bush on Friday gives the companies a few months to get their businesses in order, but hands off to President-electBarack Obama the difficult political task of ruling on their future.

The plan pumps $13.4 billion by mid-January into the companies from the fund that Congress authorized to rescue the financial industry. But the two companies have until March 31 to produce a plan for long-term profitability, including concessions from unions, creditors, suppliers and dealers.

In February, another $4 billion will be available for G.M. if the rest of the $700 billion bailout package has been released.


The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) (Pub.L. 111–5), commonly referred to as the Stimulus or The Recovery Act, was an economic stimulus package enacted by the 111th United States Congress in February 2009 and signed into law on February 17, 2009, by President Barack Obama.

To respond to the Great Recession, the primary objective for ARRA was to save and create jobs almost immediately. Secondary objectives were to provide temporary relief programs for those most impacted by the recession and invest in infrastructure, education, health, and renewable energy. The approximate cost of the economic stimulus package was estimated to be $787 billion at the time of passage, later revised to $831 billion between 2009 and 2019.[1] The Act included direct spending in infrastructure, education, health, and energy, federal tax incentives, and expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare provisions. The rationale for ARRA was from Keynesian macroeconomic theory, which argues that, during recessions, the government should offset the decrease in private spending with an increase in public spending in order to save jobs and stop further economic deterioration. Shortly after the law was passed, however, Nobel laureate Paul Krugman while supportive of the law, criticized the law for being too weak because it did not "even cover one third of the (spending) gap".[2]

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA),[1][2]commonly called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or "Obamacare",[3] is aUnited States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obamaon March 23, 2010. Together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act,[4] it represents the most significant regulatory overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system since the passage of Medicare andMedicaid in 1965.[5]
 

zerozero

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,866
Reputation
1,260
Daps
13,497
:yeshrug: stimulus could have used different approaches probably. all of them were OK ideas in my book
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,312
Reputation
-13,892
Daps
131,742
Stim pack, of course

But, you have to remember they had to pass something ASAP
 

bzb

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
3,929
Reputation
2,535
Daps
21,887
pretty much all of these are band aids or cover-ups for previously failed legislation or deregulation of important industry oversight. most of the stimulus and bailout related packages became necessary as a result to keep the economy from bottoming out.

that said, all of the above could have been better written if all the opportunist in congress didn't have their ballsack strapped to a lobbyists chin. but if i had to start with one of the above i'd say the aca.
 

Yapdatfool

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
8,422
Reputation
1,134
Daps
22,127
Reppin
NULL
Is a supreme court ruling considered legislation?

If so, I want that citizens untied shyt undone. And the ACA penalty provision for individuals taken out.
 

unit321

Hong Kong Phooey
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,214
Reputation
1,815
Daps
23,103
Reppin
USA
Bank bailouts. This isn't the first time either. Look up "Long Term Capital Management" on wiki. The Federal Reserve had to bail them out. It was damned if you do and damned if you don't situation. Same thing with the recent bank bailout. If the US government did not intervene because of foolish handling of huge amounts of cash by banks (and in the case of LTCM, a hedge fund company), then the US and global economy would have been affected. I said the "global economy". When the US economy tanks, other countries would be directly affected. That's how big we are.
We were trying to prevent a recession tailspin with bailouts. It did work, but at what expense? All the fat cats still are rich.
The real estate bubble of the 2000s was fueled by "creative" mortgage plans. Basically, banks were loaning out mortgages to people who couldn't afford the monthly payments. There were already programs that exist but they were aimed at lower income people, FreddieMac stuff. But, these had income caps, so if you earned more than that cap, you couldn't apply. So in the early 2000s, you had people with less than 20% down being able to buy homes. That's good. It's the American dream. But, a good number of these people were not good with finances, and they maxed out on the mortgage. If you are eligible for $300,000 mortgage, doesn't mean you should get a $300,000 mortgage. You may have the monthly income to afford a $200,000 so that's what you should get. Oh no. A lot of people got in over their heads. Foreclosures and bankruptcies ended that party. The real estate bubble burst. Middle income people who got into the flipping game were stuck with a second property without the means to pay for two mortgages. It was a phantom menace to society. If banks never opened the gates on lowering mortgage standards, then we would not have not experienced the huge real-estate bubble and economic growth, nor the subsequent downfall to the economy.
 

Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson

I dont have a afro i have a amerifro
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
1,147
Reputation
-475
Daps
3,525
Reppin
B.O.N.D.
da emaciation prokamashun

da freedmen's burrough bill

da rekunsrukshun acks

da thurteenf amenmint

da forteenf amenmint

da fifteenf amenmint

da anti-lynshing law

harry truemans etseckutive order dat innagraded da militerry

brown vs. da bored uh ejaculation

da cibil rites ack uh 1964

da cibil rites ack uh 1968

da votin rites ack uh 1965

loving vs. vagina

evrything dat barah obomma passed
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,972
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,062
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
da emaciation prokamashun

da freedmen's burrough bill

da rekunsrukshun acks

da thurteenf amenmint

da forteenf amenmint

da fifteenf amenmint

da anti-lynshing law

harry truemans etseckutive order dat innagraded da militerry

brown vs. da bored uh ejaculation

da cibil rites ack uh 1964

da cibil rites ack uh 1968

da votin rites ack uh 1965

loving vs. vagina

evrything dat barah obomma passed
:dead::dead::dead::dead::dead::dead:
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,790
da emaciation prokamashun

da freedmen's burrough bill

da rekunsrukshun acks

da thurteenf amenmint

da forteenf amenmint

da fifteenf amenmint

da anti-lynshing law

harry truemans etseckutive order dat innagraded da militerry

brown vs. da bored uh ejaculation

da cibil rites ack uh 1964

da cibil rites ack uh 1968

da votin rites ack uh 1965

loving vs. vagina

evrything dat barah obomma passed

:deadrose::deadmanny::dead::deadrose::deadmanny::dead:
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,338
Reputation
6,850
Daps
90,883
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
:yeshrug: stimulus could have used different approaches probably. all of them were OK ideas in my book

Stim pack, of course

But, you have to remember they had to pass something ASAP

pretty much all of these are band aids or cover-ups for previously failed legislation or deregulation of important industry oversight. most of the stimulus and bailout related packages became necessary as a result to keep the economy from bottoming out.

that said, all of the above could have been better written if all the opportunist in congress didn't have their ballsack strapped to a lobbyists chin. but if i had to start with one of the above i'd say the aca.

I'm not saying they didn't have a purpose. I want to see which policy people felt had a more damaging effect on the economic recovery. May just be me, but I thought it would be interesting to see what people would pick if they HAD to get rid of/change ONLY 1 legislation. Like what would be your reason for saving the auto industry, but letting the banks fail etc etc
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,338
Reputation
6,850
Daps
90,883
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
patriot act

Is a supreme court ruling considered legislation?

If so, I want that citizens untied shyt undone. And the ACA penalty provision for individuals taken out.

I wanted to focus on economic policies. Really force folks to make that 1 decision.

We can definitely, or you can definitely start up a new thread with the same focus, but with a focus around those 2 issues.

What options could be added to round out the choices?

1) patriot act
2) Citizens United
3 / 4 / 5) ???
 
Top