If seemingly race-neutral policies sometimes generate and perpetuate racial inequities...

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,663
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,686
Daps
203,898
Reppin
the ether
I think you can reduce inequality through race-neutral policy but you can't eliminate it. There are too many factors that interact with each other to be able to set laws that target all of them without ever addressing the unifying factor that led those inequalities to group in the first place.



dump the means testing and offer a free public university option for anybody that wants it.

While well-intentioned and I'd approve, university is not the source of the most important inequities. High school is more important than university, and elementary school is more important than high school.

Sadly the problem is the same now as it was in 1955. Until the average Black kid can regularly live in the same neighborhoods and go to the same schools as the average White kid, education will not be equal. I'm not talking about forcing Black kids to be tokens in an all-white environment, I mean actual integration. Any system that doesn't involve real integration is going to perpetually have to fight the transfer of crucial resources (not just money but also access to services, positive and healthy physical environments, and human capital) that otherwise will continue flowing from the have-nots to the haves.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: NZA

NZA

LOL
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
22,093
Reputation
4,170
Daps
56,697
Reppin
Run Thru U Like Skattebo
I think you can reduce inequality through race-neutral policy but you can't eliminate it. There are too many factors that interact with each other to be able to set laws that target all of them without ever addressing the unifying factor that led those inequalities to group in the first place.





While well-intentioned and I'd approve, university is not the source of the most important inequities. High school is more important than university, and elementary school is more important than high school.

Sadly the problem is the same now as it was in 1955. Until the average Black kid can regularly live in the same neighborhoods and go to the same schools as the average White kid, education will not be equal. I'm not talking about forcing Black kids to be tokens in an all-white environment, I mean actual integration. Any system that doesn't involve real integration is going to perpetually have to fight the transfer of crucial resources (not just money but also access to services, positive and healthy physical environments, and human capital) that otherwise will continue flowing from the have-nots to the haves.
i agree with all that. i was just tired of these think tanks trying to come up with a kinder, gentler way to restrict aid to society. it ends up with unintended consequences and universality will also protect the program from being abolished.
 
Top