How To Take Apart Fukushima's 3 Melted-Down Reactors

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,975
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,065
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
the_newsbeagle writes "In Japan, workers have spent nearly three years on the clean-up and decommissioning of the ruinedFukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. They only have 37 years to go. Taking apart the plant's three melted-down reactors is expected to take 40 years and cost $15 billion. The plant's owner, TEPCO, admits that its engineers don't yet know how they'll pull off this monumental task. An in-depth examination of the decommissioning process explains the challenges, such as working amid the radioactive rubble, stopping up the leaks that spill radioactive water throughout the site, and handling the blobs of melted nuclear fuel. Many of the tasks will be accomplished by newly invented robots that can go where humans fear to tread."
 

zayk35

Superstar
Joined
Jul 21, 2012
Messages
12,801
Reputation
2,592
Daps
46,078
Reppin
Escondido California
the_newsbeagle writes "In Japan, workers have spent nearly three years on the clean-up and decommissioning of the ruinedFukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. They only have 37 years to go. Taking apart the plant's three melted-down reactors is expected to take 40 years and cost $15 billion. The plant's owner, TEPCO, admits that its engineers don't yet know how they'll pull off this monumental task. An in-depth examination of the decommissioning process explains the challenges, such as working amid the radioactive rubble, stopping up the leaks that spill radioactive water throughout the site, and handling the blobs of melted nuclear fuel. Many of the tasks will be accomplished by newly invented robots that can go where humans fear to tread."
HMMMMMMMMMMMM
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
35,653
Reppin
NULL
Build expensive and safety dubious energy production facilities ...... take 40 years to de-commission brehs

Where else would the Japanese get all the power they need to power their neon cities and anime conventions? I guess where the Japanese made their mistake was in underestimating typhoon conditions and the calamity that could occur with nuclear reactors in such circumstances. Everything is 20/20 in hindsight though. On the side-by-side basis, nuclear reactions are the best and most efficient sources of energy production in the world.
 

bigDeeOT

Banned
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
739
Reputation
-640
Daps
406
shyt like that will make someone commit suicide. Imagine you being the one responsible for the sloppy safety precautions leading to a 40 year clean up and $15 billion dollar mistake!
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Bushed
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,920
Reputation
5,122
Daps
114,961
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
Where else would the Japanese get all the power they need to power their neon cities and anime conventions? I guess where the Japanese made their mistake was in underestimating typhoon conditions and the calamity that could occur with nuclear reactors in such circumstances. Everything is 20/20 in hindsight though. On the side-by-side basis, nuclear reactions are the best and most efficient sources of energy production in the world.


41ae43cf7d59a84641ee8da3366d9e30.gif
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,284
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
This wouldn't be nearly as much of an issue if they had used Thorium, but they just HAD to have weapons-grade materials to be competitive with the US and Soviets.

'White' people ruining the planet......by-proxy.​
 
Top