Ironically enough, there aren't any enormous differences in spending habits between all three groups but especially the middle-class and upper-class.
the housing percentage isn't fair cause we all know the poor don't have a mortgage and that its for rent.
ironically the rich can have money to save for retirement while the poor cant because they are most likely living check to check
Then what are they spending their money on for housingTheir rent is generally paid for by the state but yeah.
Actually the only two big differences have HUGE impacts in the long term: education and saving for retirement. And those impacts are not only negative for the poor people who can't get proper education and/or retirement, but for society as a whole.
i dont think you know what ironic means.
is it a surprise the rich are able to save more money then poor people? what is the point of this article?