How the family unit was designed to oppress women’s sexuality

King Khufu

CARTEL MAFIA GANG
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
5,210
Reputation
-566
Daps
8,828
Reppin
At Ur Mama's Bando
JUNE 25, 2017 BY MSAFROPOLITAN2 COMMENTS

fam.jpg


A group of states including the six African states Cote d’Ivoire, Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco, Tunisia and Uganda have recently tabled a resolution at the 35th session of the UN Human Rights Councilentitled, “Protection of the Family: Role of the Family in Supporting the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights of Older Persons.”

In the resolution, ‘the family’ is positioned as an institution that needs protection. The fact that a large proportion of human rights abuses such as marital rape, child abuse, FGM, domestic violence as well as everyday sexist oppression largely occurs within families is conveniently ignored. Also, despite that the family unit is not a one size fits all concept, the idea of the nuclear family – husband, wife and two children – maintains its stronghold. This propagation of the stereotype family unit is tied to upholding the status quo, including ownership of women’s sexuality.

Here’s a curious thing: many men don’t understand why women love sex because they themselves have been denied the joy to love their own bodies. They can’t understand how their bodies, that have indeed been so wrongly and unjustifiably connected to dominance and violence, can bring a woman genuine pleasure. What they don’t know is that in women’s subconscious memory, there has always resided a ravenous intuitive desire for sex.

Before the event of agrarian capitalism, individual men were dispensable to women who then tended to live in female- and children majority societies while men hunted and migrated. These women shared men as they appeared, they had no incentive to compete for men, what mattered was that men could give them babies and sex.

The institutionalisation of the family unit, polygamous and later monogamous, was a way to curb what in our times would be considered an insouciant sexual assertiveness. In fact, the word ‘family’ comes from Latin “familia” which referred to “the servants in a household.” In order for property and land to stay in the possession of men, the family unit was created and women who continued to be freely sexual, were among other things, burnt as witches.

It is understandable that the new proto-capitalist system where land was a commodity led men to want to secure the land they’d worked hard to earn, but every woman knows in her heart of hearts that her true sexual lineage is less attached than a man’s because she is traditionally not tied to patrilineal possessions. In not “owning” land, she also felt less need to “own” people. I am not saying that women were promiscuous in the modern sense, but they didn’t turn a natural act into something sacrilegious. Nor am I making a judgement either way, we’ve all won some rights and lost others, I am simply a messenger of a lost history which may or may not be relevant for the times we live in.

What does clearly matter today though, is to understand why patriarchally minded people and institutions are adamant about upholding the “family unit”, no matter the cost. Family can nevertheless be a beautiful thing, but the ‘family unit’ is a cantankerous concept.

Your thoughts babes?
 

Uitomy

Superstar
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
12,042
Reputation
1,579
Daps
43,466
Reppin
Anxiety attacks and sugar cookies
Why do people think married women are denied from sex? Back in the day, wives had 7 or 8 babies. What's the problem?
People value casual sex to much, looking at the out of wedlock birthrates and the std rates now I can see why people took sex so seriously and had a lock on that shyt, it's too dangerous to just get thrown around so loosely and that goes for both sexes
 

™BlackPearl The Empress™

Long Live the Empire
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
46,637
Reputation
19,781
Daps
187,125
When people say they wanna return to the old days I oftentimes wonder which old days they talm bout. History has a plethora of examples of different family structures not built on the control of female sexuality.

@King Khufu i don't think they ready for this.

I usually think they mean when men could go upside a woman's head and nobody has a problem with it.
 

Taadow

The StarchBishop™️
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
40,723
Reputation
9,707
Daps
101,636
Reppin
Crispness
In the resolution, ‘the family’ is positioned as an institution that needs protection. The fact that a large proportion of human rights abuses such as marital rape, child abuse, FGM, domestic violence as well as everyday sexist oppression largely occurs within families is conveniently ignored.

So is "the family unit" the reason for this, or is it individuals?

This propagation of the stereotype family unit is tied to upholding the status quo, including ownership of women’s sexuality.

...as well as men's. Why isn't that mentioned?

Here’s a curious thing: many men don’t understand why women love sex

There's some truth to this, but not because of why this article says...

What they don’t know is that in women’s subconscious memory, there has always resided a ravenous intuitive desire for sex.

Interesting. Why?

Before the event of agrarian capitalism, individual men were dispensable to women who then tended to live in female- and children majority societies while men hunted and migrated. These women shared men as they appeared, they had no incentive to compete for men, what mattered was that men could give them babies and sex.

Is that much different from now?

The institutionalisation of the family unit, polygamous and later monogamous, was a way to curb what in our times would be considered an insouciant sexual assertiveness.

Again, it could be argued this was for both genders.

It is understandable that the new proto-capitalist system where land was a commodity led men to want to secure the land they’d worked hard to earn, but every woman knows in her heart of hearts that her true sexual lineage is less attached than a man’s because she is traditionally not tied to patrilineal possessions.

This cannot be serious.

In not “owning” land, she also felt less need to “own” people.

Word?

What does clearly matter today though, is to understand why patriarchally minded people and institutions are adamant about upholding the “family unit”, no matter the cost. Family can nevertheless be a beautiful thing, but the ‘family unit’ is a cantankerous concept.

Does the writer know what "cantankerous" means?
 

5thbornpowerseed

All Star
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
1,114
Reputation
-344
Daps
3,355
Nah.
I disagree.
Women have babies and t*ts with baby food.
Men are physically stronger.
Women live longer.
And so on and so on....
Natural order gave rise to family units....

To equate "family unit" with the rise of modern capitalists ideals and some how squeeze in a rationale for women fukking alot is a reach.
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
103,063
Reputation
13,348
Daps
243,147
When I read oppress sexuality I feel like I'm reading something written by a lesbian or a promiscuous woman who still wants access to men's resources
 

jackson35

Banned
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
6,750
Reputation
-2,338
Daps
6,426
JUNE 25, 2017 BY MSAFROPOLITAN2 COMMENTS

fam.jpg


A group of states including the six African states Cote d’Ivoire, Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco, Tunisia and Uganda have recently tabled a resolution at the 35th session of the UN Human Rights Councilentitled, “Protection of the Family: Role of the Family in Supporting the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights of Older Persons.”

In the resolution, ‘the family’ is positioned as an institution that needs protection. The fact that a large proportion of human rights abuses such as marital rape, child abuse, FGM, domestic violence as well as everyday sexist oppression largely occurs within families is conveniently ignored. Also, despite that the family unit is not a one size fits all concept, the idea of the nuclear family – husband, wife and two children – maintains its stronghold. This propagation of the stereotype family unit is tied to upholding the status quo, including ownership of women’s sexuality.

Here’s a curious thing: many men don’t understand why women love sex because they themselves have been denied the joy to love their own bodies. They can’t understand how their bodies, that have indeed been so wrongly and unjustifiably connected to dominance and violence, can bring a woman genuine pleasure. What they don’t know is that in women’s subconscious memory, there has always resided a ravenous intuitive desire for sex.

Before the event of agrarian capitalism, individual men were dispensable to women who then tended to live in female- and children majority societies while men hunted and migrated. These women shared men as they appeared, they had no incentive to compete for men, what mattered was that men could give them babies and sex.

The institutionalisation of the family unit, polygamous and later monogamous, was a way to curb what in our times would be considered an insouciant sexual assertiveness. In fact, the word ‘family’ comes from Latin “familia” which referred to “the servants in a household.” In order for property and land to stay in the possession of men, the family unit was created and women who continued to be freely sexual, were among other things, burnt as witches.

It is understandable that the new proto-capitalist system where land was a commodity led men to want to secure the land they’d worked hard to earn, but every woman knows in her heart of hearts that her true sexual lineage is less attached than a man’s because she is traditionally not tied to patrilineal possessions. In not “owning” land, she also felt less need to “own” people. I am not saying that women were promiscuous in the modern sense, but they didn’t turn a natural act into something sacrilegious. Nor am I making a judgement either way, we’ve all won some rights and lost others, I am simply a messenger of a lost history which may or may not be relevant for the times we live in.

What does clearly matter today though, is to understand why patriarchally minded people and institutions are adamant about upholding the “family unit”, no matter the cost. Family can nevertheless be a beautiful thing, but the ‘family unit’ is a cantankerous concept.

Your thoughts babes?
this is the european man an women position on this topic. they can't speak for the African woman.the black woman lost touch with all of these things because he raped and soul her to other devils across the globe
 

Schmoove

All Star
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
5,243
Reputation
276
Daps
6,355
Didn’t read yet but why is “women’s sexuality” always = promiscuity

Because sexuality is considered promiscuous when it's not tied to the family unit.

See the OP
 
Top