Hold the Dark' Is the Most Brutal Movie on Netflix

Sonic Boom of the South

Louisiana, Army War Vet, Jackson State Univ Alum,
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
79,991
Reputation
23,330
Daps
289,850
Reppin
Rosenbreg's, Rosenberg's...1825, Tulane
'Hold the Dark' Is the Most Brutal Movie on Netflix

Off the heels of his success with 'Green Room,' Jeremy Saulnier's first big-budget film is a sensible departure from his past work.


Jeremy Saulnier is no stranger to violence. The director made real headway with his 2015 film, Green Room, which features a neo-Nazi Patrick Stewart trying to kill a punk rock band that witnessed a murder in his Pacific Northwest club. But he had really cemented himself in blood—in the action-thriller genre—years before, with Blue Ruin (2013), a crowd-funded, family revenge tale, and Murder Party (2007), a comedy-horror hybrid about hip sadistic art students. (He was supposed to be one of the directors for the forthcoming season of True Detective, but departed the show after two episodes.) Though Saulnier's newest project, Hold the Dark, a Netflix original that recently premiered on the streaming platform, perhaps includes more gore than any of his previous attempts (it definitely has a higher body count), it's still something of a departure for him. Or, in the very least, a notable evolution: a sweeping, expansive work of art set, it seems, at the end of the world.

Here, Jeffrey Wright, one of the stars of that robot show everyone stopped watching, plays Russell Core, a writer and naturalist who travels to the small village of Keelut, Alaska, at the request of a woman named Medora Sloane (Riley Keough). Wolves, she writes to him, have been ripping children from their homes, and she believes her son to be the most recent victim. Since he's covered the beast before, can Core help her find her kid? Medora's husband, Vernon (Alexander Skarsgård), meanwhile, is busy shooting a gun in Fallujah, and, in the only scene not in the winter-clad wilderness, we see his nihilistic tendencies without any misunderstanding: We know he's going to return home from the war, and we know he's not the type of man who'll let the kidnapper of his kin off the hook, whoever that may turn out to be. What transpires is a nearly biblical tale—of man against nature, light against dark—and, really, that's about all left to say. To explain more—to try to explain more—would ruin the story's mythic power.


Saulnier's a visually arresting artist, and he certainly didn't make it easy on himself this time around. He adapted Hold the Dark from a sparse book, a literary novel by the writer and critic William Giraldi, an instructor at Boston University and an editor at the journal AGNI, who's as protective and fierce about language as anyone in existence. (Here's Giraldi's view on the internet in a line: "I just can't fathom wasting a solitary minute on Twitter or Facebook," he said to the Huffington Post in 2015, "when Paradise Lost is waiting here.")






 

Monoblock

Smoooth
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
30,319
Reputation
9,691
Daps
117,992
Reppin
Houston
I saw everyone talking about this movie last week and decided watch. fukking boring. I mean besides the shootout with the cops the Indian guy had with the M60 what was so brutal about this? It was just boring and ended flat as hell.
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
20,269
Reputation
6,121
Daps
63,659
Reppin
San Diego
From another thread:

I love his direction, the music, some of the shots and sequences are masterful, in fact many. The plane trip in the final scenes, the first wolf attack, the shootout, though I felt that was a little derivative of "Wind River" in fact, a lot of the movie seemed influenced by it. The music, the central themes, the setting, maybe it is just to be expected given all the similarities.

There is so much to love and appreciate, it is shame that the flaws don't quite make for a movie I can really like, and be taken in by. The Skarsgard character, doing his usual disturbed white male, only seemed menacing when he donned the mask, and while I looked up the ending and interpretations, none of it really makes much sense. None of characters truly connect, and a lot seems maybe lost in translation from the novel, or just adapted poorly. The plot and the characters motivations are bizarre to nonsensical, to the worst of cliches, ie: the tracker summoned to the remote wilderness with a handwritten note, only to end up riding shotgun in a manhunt for dangerous criminal.

It kind of descends into the worst of Reding Refn's nihilistic violence, and stylized brutality. It disappointed me, but I would watch if a fan of Saulnier, I hope he can take his strengths and convey it into something more meaningful and tightly written.
 
Top