Last edited:
Have your new Range Rover break down brehs
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
Range Rovers are infamously known for being not reliable. at all. More of a show, luxury car than a method of transportation. Not unless you have a stash saved up just for repairs for Ranges alone. Very overrated in terms of quality/ reliability. Design on the newer models are trash. (wouldn't mind having an older model one as a 2nd car tho..always had a thing for them).
Last edited:
LOWKEY...I'm eyeing a Jeep Grand Cherokee...was gonna cop a German...but...Buy Dodge....
#AmericanMuscle
I came in here to type all of this. I've heard the same and steered clear of them.
General Mills
More often than not I tend to take that L.
But yo dawg. What’s the difference between a 4.0 and a 4.6?
I'm always hearing about these cars breaking down like crazy
:awkwardjayz:But yo dawg. What’s the difference between a 4.0 and a 4.6?
CashmereThoughts
Veteran
Ranges are for people that have multiple other expensive whips and can rotate it in and out of the shop. you would have less problems with a 93 dodge neon
Bumblebreh
Collecting honey and money
Good choice. Range Rovers are ass
Might be the worst engineered SUV in existence
Mass produced and over engineered despite the fact the car will mostly be used in urban cities.
My dream truck! I rented one and fell in love with it.
Bumblebreh
Collecting honey and money
yes but a lot of people who drive rovers are not even rich like that.
Don't get me started on Dodge Chargers... smh.. lol.Buy Dodge....
Might be the worst engineered SUV in existence
The BMW X5s are next on the list.