Google Doesn't Want You to Google This

[tmonster]

 

[Brown_Pride]

I hope something does come of this these wack ass tax laws are evil....

 

[Poitier]

We need to reincarnate William Taft

 

[The_King_of_Everything]

Really fukked up

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

this is the most fukked up shyt ive ever watched..

i blame conservatards..

 

[Dooby]

But yet...we for the most part remain powerless to counter anything to do with this. Why?

 

[Type Username Here]

this is the most fukked up shyt ive ever watched..

i blame conservatards..

You would be wrong. The tech and Hollywood companies and entities donate heavily into the Democrat party. They are complicit.

 

[Type Username Here]

But yet...we for the most part remain powerless to counter anything to do with this. Why?

Various reasons, most of which you already know

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

You would be wrong. The tech and Hollywood companies and entities donate heavily into the Democrat party. They are complicit.

yeah sure they "donate"..

 

[Type Username Here]

The Revenue Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 1014 (Aug. 30, 1935), raised United States federal income tax on higher income levels, by introducing the "Wealth Tax". It was a progressive tax that took up to 75 percent on incomes over 5 million.[1]

It was signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

The 1935 Act also was popularly known at the time as the "Soak the Rich" tax.[2] To solve the problem of tax evasion through loopholes, the Revenue Act of 1937 revised tax laws and regulations to increase the efficacy of the tax.

Remember when the government had some sway economically? It only lasted a decade or two.

Let's see what the opposition to this act said:

Because of the disproportionate effect the Act had on the rich, the law became labeled by critics as the “Soak the Rich” tax.

Critics further charged that the rich simply didn’t have enough money to pay for the government’s programs, and that “soaking the rich” would ultimately lead to severe harm to the economy and the middle and lower classes.

 

[RAX 010]

Sometimes I question why in the life of me did I choose to incarnate here?
Smmfh

 

[Kritic]

cenk was careful going at google when he could've exposed GE which is probably worse cause they do "business with iran" and support terrorism. bill oreilly exposed GE with something similar. Funny thing is bill will expose GE (msnbc) but won't do it with fox entertainment group.

i fux with the young turks but they lean a little too left for me.

 

[tmonster]

Remember when the government had some sway economically? It only lasted a decade or two.

Let's see what the opposition to this act said:

You must spread reputation to at least 40 other user(s) before you can give reputation to Type Username Here again.

 

[IGSaint12]

You would be wrong. The tech and Hollywood companies and entities donate heavily into the Democrat party. They are complicit.

They donate heavily to both the democrat and republican party nowadays.

 

[Type Username Here]

They donate heavily to both the democrat and republican party nowadays.

All corporations, businesses and wealthy people (though this group is more likely to be partisan) do. It's smart business practice. Though certain industries obviously have their sides. If we take a look at just the Presidential election 2 years back:

According to the CRP, celebrities have shelled out $684,006 to the Obama campaign and $43,250 to the Romney campaign through October, a 16-to-1 advantage for the president over the challenger.

The CRP also tracks money from the entertainment industry as a whole, where Obama brought in $4,518,742 compared with Romney’s $836,038, a 5-to-1 ratio.

http://www.newsmax.com/Hirsen/Hollywood-Obama-Romney-donations/2012/10/29/id/461866/

But this isn't some ground breaking news here. That by the way is money donated legally through political contributions. Who knows what the real money is when you start taking into account loopholes, PACs and other shyt.